Many schools across the country are developing something called Portrait of a Graduate. At the elementary level, this is called Portrait of a Learner. SAU21 just put out a notice to parents that they will be discussing this program on Tuesday October 4th at Winnacunnet High School.
So what will be discussed? Will they tell you that Portrait of a Graduate is a national program created by an Ohio-based company called Battelle for Kids? Portrait of a Graduate is being used to fundamentally transform the purpose of US education.
It shifts curriculum, assessment, school accountability, and data collection away from academics and toward Social and Emotional Learning (SEL).
Battelle for Kids was created by Battelle, an applied science and technology company that uses technology to track behaviors. The program was incentivized through policies and grants in the 2015 federal education law the Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA. ESSA replaced No Child Left Behind and was signed into law during the Obama administration with bi-partisan support. These policies are an extension of Common Core reforms.
Some of Battelle’s strategic partners that direct states’ adoption of Portrait of a Graduate are CASEL (Watch the video where Tim Shriver admits teaching academics is no longer important), Aurora Institute, ExcelinEd <JEB BUSH (who profits off of his online Charter Schools) and KnowledgeWorks. These companies are working towards mass data collection of children’s values, attitudes and behaviors (aka..mental health) with a company called the Data Quality Campaign.
The Data Quality Campaign was instrumental in developing states’ State Longitudinal Data Systems. So, Portrait of a Graduate/Learner is, essentially, a program to expand New Hampshire’s State Longitudinal Data System, and start tracking children into all sorts of social services including health services, and into the workforce. You can read more about that here from the Parent Coalition for Student Privacy. Here are the data elements you should be concerned about.
Every few months, more data elements are “defined” and added to the CEDS, so that more information about a child’s life can be easily collected, stored, shared across agencies, and disclosed to third parties. You can check out the CEDS database yourself, including data points recently added, or enter the various terms like “disability,” “homeless” or “income” in the search bar.
In relation to discipline, for example, CEDS includes information concerning student detentions, letters of apology, demerits, warnings, counseling, suspension and expulsion records, whether the student was involved in an incident that involved weapons, whether he or she was arrested, whether there was a court hearing and what the judicial outcome and punishment was, including incarceration.
This type of information is obviously very sensitive and prejudicial, and often in juvenile court, records are kept sealed or destroyed after a certain period of time, especially if the child is found innocent or there is no additional offense; yet all this information can now be entered into his or her longitudinal record with no particular restriction on access and no time certain when the data would be destroyed.
In the final scheme of things, Portrait of a Graduate/Learner is the backbone for Social Credit Scoring and ESG scores for children.
New Hampshire
As the leader in implementing competency education, New Hampshire recognized the need for a state data system that was better equipped to communicate with district systems and provide necessary supports. The Initiative for School Empowerment and Excellence reduces the burden on schools and gives information back to schools based on regularly collected data to encourage student achievement through rigorous data use and analysis.
By encouraging states to develop data systems with complete information, the Data Quality Campaign has been essential to the first step of creating meaningful data systems across the country. With data collection getting better and better, the next step must address the use of this data. Collection and compliance alone have not and will not support students in reaching their full potential.
KnowledgeWorks is a Gates-funded organization (also based in Ohio) that the State Boards of Education paid to facilitate the districts’ adoption of Battelle’s SEL framework. (Pilot programs and legislation for Competency-Based Education will align “competencies” to those in Portrait of a Graduate) Local teachers are brought into the process to determine competencies, but only for show. In actuality, they are being shifted into becoming facilitators of the SEL system, and, over time, the entire system will be geared toward SEL.
Here are some resources:
• Battelle’s website where they show that they are driving the work of states and districts across the US:
https://portraitofagraduate.org/
**KnowledgeWorks’ explains their work in New Hampshire: Policy Conditions in Action: Comprehensive Supports for Educators and Leaders in New Hampshire. In 2011, a group of postsecondary leaders in New Hampshire formed the IHE Network to influence policymakers and engage practitioners to promote innovative programs and policies that link educator preparation, new educator induction and ongoing professional development in the state.
Leadership
- President – Kristen Downey, Upper Valley Educators Institute
- Vice President – Nick Marks, Granite State College
- Secretary – Dale Boyle, Franklin Pierce University
- Treasurer – Nick Marks, Granite State College
https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/nh-comprehensive-supports-educators-leaders/
• KnowledgeWorks’ explains that they are replacing academics with competency-based learning which they see mirroring the “anti-racist” work of Marxist Ibram X. Kendi:
https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/detracking-personalized-competency-based-learning-replace-tracking/?fbclid=IwAR0uCEWMYOQDBsv9XUDK1ZWrm2sJHklD93045RrBJkyq0rnR-nEj4qx4Yrw
• KnowledgeWorks says our Constitution is racist and that education has to fix that:
https://knowledgeworks.org/resources/collectively-striving-more-perfect-union/?fbclid=IwAR1Y8gZvCg6F8idHhE_p9ymtIiLtD9enmuVdw_iVRs50A1Qe2Vl5fprK_R8
• Panorama Education’s website shows how they use Portrait of a Graduate to build their behavioral surveys and data collection. (Panorama was founded by US AG Merrick Garland’s son-in-law….the reason that Garland went after parents that oppose Critical Race Theory at local school boards).
https://www.panoramaed.com/blog/comprehensive-guide-portrait-of-a-graduate?fbclid=IwAR0wxa5s00ETMagTIjOIRBM08NeJvlxyNbAyrrPDdB9nYuQdeiCOeNCKR8g
What does this mean for the children in SAU21? MASSIVE data mining of your child’s behavior, attitudes, values, etc. (aka..their mental health)
What will this be used for? Good question but many of the researchers say for Social Credit Scoring and ESG scores for children.
Once the data on your children is collected, stored and sent who knows where, you no longer control it.
Parents are looking for ways to avoid all SEL (Social and Emotional) screenings, assessments in the schools because of the data mining. While SEL may sound good, it’s the data mining that is the biggest threat to your child’s future.
In SAU21 they will be using the PEAR screening on your children for SEL purposes. While they will be required to obtain parental consent, here is what PEAR says about sharing information with parents:
Will PEAR have access to your child’s sensitive information?
What is one of the biggest reasons parents are withdrawing their children from public schools? DATA MINING.
So what is the big deal about SEL in our schools? I think Nancy Bailey summed it up perfectly in this article titled: Social Emotional Learning: The Dark Side. Who is Nancy Bailey? First she’s NO RIGHT WINGER. She describes herself as:
EVERY parent should scroll through her list of problems with SEL. Pay close attention to what she lists here:
SEL and Social Impact Bonds and Pay for Success
School districts are encouraged to use SIBs or Pay for Success to fund programs. Schools get money for students based on their social and emotional skills. Upon student improvement, companies get back their contribution with a profit.
For example, SEL is listed in the U.S. Department of Education (DeVos) Pay for Success Feasibility Tool Kit: Considerations for State and Local Leaders to increase kindergarten readiness (p.6).
Before anyone still claims this is a conspiracy make note that the union AFSME opposes the use of SIBs too.
This isn’t about right vs left on SEL. This is about standing against Corp. profiteers who will capitalize $$$$ on all of the data and products they now sell to our schools. This is also about social control through Social Credit Scoring and ESG scores for children. Wall Street investors will profit off of the SIBs, Ed Tech and vendors will profit off of schools that purchase these products that data mine your child’s mental health information.
What do I advise parents to so when it comes to SEL: AVOID SEL at all costs. NO screenings, assessments, treatment, or anything else. Unfortunately they are now embedding SEL into the curriculum. That makes this task challenging for sure.
In NH parents do have the right to opt out of objectionable material, but this could get complicated if it’s embedded in the curriculum.
What do you get?
It’s not “improved academics,” that’s for sure.
My advice? AVOID SEL and AVOID this screening for your children.
The post Portrait of a Learner in SAU21: More Data Mining Your Child’s Mental Health for $$$ appeared first on Granite Grok.