Political prisoner Christopher Cantwell is joined by Jared Howe via telephone for this tenth episode of LIVE from Seg!, recorded live on October 17th, 2017 and presented by the Radical Agenda.

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 010 – Time Is On My Side

Please donate! https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 010 – Time Is On My Side appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Political prisoner Christopher Cantwell is joined by Jared Howe via telephone for this eighth episode of LIVE from Seg!, recorded live on October 14th, 2017 and presented by the Radical Agenda.

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 008 – A Radical Agenda

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 008 – A Radical Agenda appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Political prisoner Christopher Cantwell is joined by Jared Howe via telephone for this ninth episode of LIVE from Seg!, recorded live on October 15th, 2017 and presented by the Radical Agenda.

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 009 – 14888

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 009 – 14888 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Call between Christopher Cantwell and Mike Enoch

https://soundcloud.com/user-458362141/letters-episode-18

 

Please contribute! https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Letters From a Charlottesville Jail Episode 18 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 007 – Down and Out-Jewed

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 007 – Down and Out-Jewed

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 007 – Down and Out-Jewed appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Hey, Lefties: Where Are Your Pussyhats Now?   Good question!

No group was more offended by Trump’s remarks, or so it seemed, than the newly minted Puritans of Hollywood. Celebrities went ballistic, firing off furious and anguished tweets about the Republican presidential candidate. Film producers, television actors, movie stars: everyone had something to say about Trump and many equated his remarks to sexual assault. 

Oh but that was so last year.

Now, here we are, one year later, and the New York Times just published a bombshell expose about one of Hollywood’s most powerful men, Harvey Weinstein. The lecherous behavior of this disgusting man is one of Hollywood’s worst-kept secrets; no doubt the Times could have an ongoing series of articles about this movie-making, sexual predator. Like many Hollywood moguls, Weinstein parlayed his fortune and influence into political power, becoming a major Democratic party donor and fundraiser. Since 1990, he has contributed more than $1 million to Democratic PACs, officeholders, and candidates, many of whom must have been aware of Weinstein’s reputation as a first-rate vulture.

[...]

The ire about the p*ssy tape never was about sexual harassment or women’s empowerment. It’s just liberal politics as usual.

Political prisoner Christopher Cantwell is joined by Jared Howe via telephone for this sixth episode of LIVE from Seg!, recorded live on October 4th and 5th, 2017 and presented by the Radical Agenda.

**DONATE TO CHRIS’ HATREON ACCOUNT**

***Donate to Chris’ GOYFUNDME!!***

Topics discussed include:

• Stephen Paddock
• Leftist gun grabs
• Race and crime
• Much, much more!

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE make sure to donate to Chris so that he can fight these trumped up charges against him.

Check out the podcast here:

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 006 – Sloke-a-Motive

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 006 – Sloke-a-Motive appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy lost of 33,000 jobs in September according to its payroll survey, buts its household survey shows "Employed" went up by 906,000.  That's an astonishing number. 

In general, the media are focusing on decline in company payrolls and ignoring the household survey.  Under the headline "U.S. Sheds Jobs on Hurricane Loss, but Unemployment Falls" the Wall Street Journal highlights the 33,000 jobs reportedly lost in September.

The Labor Department Friday reported the first decline in U.S. nonfarm payrolls in seven years, suggesting the economy took a hit from hurricanes in Florida and Texas.

The "economy took a hit" but "unemployment falls."  How does that happen?  Easier than you might think.  The Bureau of Labor Statistics measures employment using two surveys, the payroll survey and the household survey.  The payroll survey counts the number of people on company payrolls as reported by the companies.  In the household survey, a households are queried as to the number of people in the household and how many are employed.  The household survey is generally considered more accurate because it takes self-employment into account and other forms of employment that might not show up on company payrolls.

So the Journal reported on the payroll survey for jobs numbers and on the household survey for the unemployment rate, but it said nothing about the jobs numbers as reported in the household survey.  The household survey numbers are strikingly at variance with the payroll survey numbers.  Take a look at the snapshot below taken from the Household Data in the BLS Employment Situation Summary Table.

The unemployment rate is calculated as the percentage of people considered to be in the civilian labor force who do not have paying jobs.  The civilian labor force number is a moving target because people who have given up looking for a job, even though they may be employable and not employed, are not considered to be in civilian labor force.  In September the civilian labor force grew by 575,000.  Some of this is attributed to workforce population growth of 205,000, but the larger number, 368,000, includes the number of people who have started looking for work again after having previously given up.  Scrolling down on the BLS Employment Situation page brings you to Frequently Asked Questions and this (boldface is mine):

1. Why are there two monthly measures of employment?

The household survey and establishment survey both produce sample-based estimates of employment, and both have strengths and limitations. The establishment survey employment series has a smaller margin of error on the measurement of month-to-month change than the household survey because of its much larger sample size. An over-the-month employment change of about 100,000 is statistically significant in the establishment survey, while the threshold for a statistically significant change in the household survey is about 500,000. However, the household survey has a more expansive scope than the establishment survey because it includes self-employed workers whose businesses are unincorporated, unpaid family workers, agricultural workers, and private household workers, who are excluded by the establishment survey. The household survey also provides estimates of employment for demographic groups. For more information on the differences between the two surveys, please visit https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/ces_cps_trends.htm.

It's safe to say that 906,000 is a statistically significant change.  In order for the unemployment rate to go down, employment had to increase by more than 575,000, and it did.  It went up by an astonishing number.  Compare that to August where, if you do the arithmetic, the chart shows that "Employed" went down by 74,000.

What might account for a statistically significant change in the household survey?  One factor could be the business climate under the business friendlier Trump administration.  Another could be consumer confidence and general confidence which has seems to have gone up since Trump took office.  Improvements in technology and internet services might also have had an impact by making it easier for people to launch home based businesses.  And finally, the reduction in federal regulations may be making the prospects of joining the ranks of the self-employed less and less daunting.  Whatever, 906,000 is an astounding number.

What is not astonishing is the media's unwillingness to report it.  They just can't bear the thought of good news on Trump's watch.

 

Please donate! https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Cantwell and Kessler: Lawless: Antifa Operating As A Militant Street Gang appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Here it is:

Link to the post on Duke’s site:

Dr. Duke & Collett Expose the Coverup of the LV White Massacre and Chris Cantwell Tells His Side of Charlottesville

 

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Christopher Cantwell on the David Duke show appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

This is a piece written by a volunteer for this website that was not suggested by Chris.

Chris is currently in jail as a political prisoner for what happened in Charlottesville. He could have done what a lot of people such as myself did that night, and just stayed home, watched what was happening on the livestreams, then talked about it non-stop on social media and on his podcast. Had he done that, his personal life would be so much better right now. He would be in his house doing the podcast 3-5 days per week. Instead, he risked everything going out there.

Since then, lots of bad things happened to him. He was banned from Facebook, Instagram, and OkCupid. He was lied about in the media who referred to him the “crying nazi” despite the fact that Chris is not a nazi. He has also lost access to his paypal account which will make it harder for him to receive payments when he gets out. He’s being held in jail being denied bail despite the fact the first judge granted it to him and that the prosecution appealed. He’s in jail because he was protesting for your rights.

At the time I began writing this, on the Goyfundme link he has raised $8,806.81 from 128 different people. That’s an average of $68.80 per donor. The initial goal was $25,000. He’s over 1/3 of the way there. There’s a lot of fees involved in a court case, and he still has his other bills that he needs to pay. Lots of people have done great work for the movement or have donated money to others who have. For you guys, we couldn’t be more grateful. For people who haven’t donated anything yet, now is your chance. There will never be a more important time to do so.

Please donate to the link below:

https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/ 

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Please send Chris money. appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/user-279886828/letters-from-a-charlottesville-jail-episode-17

 

Backup player:

https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ffdef2b9-7d68-4d8a-97a8-90682962a37d.mp3

 

 

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Letters from a Charlottesville jail episode 17 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

 

*Unite the Right cost for Charlottesville at ~$170,000 and growing

*Russians used Facebook to promote Black Lives Matter in Ferguson and the popularity of Hillary Clinton with Muslim women during the election

*Communists Begin Infiltrating the US Military

Support Chris’ legal defense fund: goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

More at ChristopherCantwell.com and JasonKessler.us

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Cantwell and Kessler: UTR cost at $170,000, Russians promoted BLM on Facebook & Communists infiltrating the military appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Who would have guessed that it was at President Barack Obama's urging that Facebook disabled Libertarian Leanings ad account?  Connecting the dots here!

A Fox News report describes Embarrassment at The Washington Post over a story implying that Obama reached out to Mark Zuckerberg specifically about Russian Facebook ads in the 2016 election.  The truth is Obama did not mention Russia when he spoke to Zuckerberg, but he did want Facebook to filter out other "Fake News."

The Washington Post has made a correction to an explosive cover story that undermines the entire premise of Monday’s front-page article headlined, "Obama sought to prod Facebook on Russia role."

The problem, according to a Facebook executive, is that when Obama reached out to the social media giant in 2016 to discuss political disinformation spreading on the site, he didn’t actually call out Russia – essentially making the Post’s headline misleading and inaccurate. Or, as President Trump would call it, “fake news.”

As first reported by Axios, the Post added significant information to the digital version of the story with the disclaimer, “This story has been updated with an additional response from Facebook.” The response from Facebook that didn’t make the paper’s print edition is vital and changed the story enough that the word “Russia” was removed from the updated headline.

The story detailed how then-President Obama gave Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg a “wake-up call” regarding fake news spreading on his social media platform. After reporting that Obama “made a personal appeal to Zuckerberg to take the threat of fake news and political disinformation seriously," the paper has added that Obama “did not single out Russia specifically."

So far as I know, while Obama did not specifically single Russia, he did not single out out Libertarian Leanings either.  However, Facebook did respond to Obama's appeal, and it did disable Libertarian Leanings' Facebook ad account in the aftermath.  Yes, my friends, the opinions that I have shared on Libertarian Leanings are fake news according to Facebook.  

My story begins in February of 2015 when I created a Libertarian Leanings Facebook page with the objective of increasing the reach of the Libertarian Leanings blog.  One of Facebook's tools that I thought would help me do this is Facebook advertising.  For a small fee, my range was $5 to $20, Facebook would promote a Libertarian Leanings post by advertising it on the Facebook pages of an audience that I could target within a certain set of parameters.  Truth be told, the advertising didn't help much.  Most Facebook users never bothered to click through to the Libertarian Leanings article that I hoped to promote.  Be that as it may, that advertising tool is no longer available to Libertarian Leanings.

Libertarian Leanings apparently fell from favor shortly before the November 8th presidential election.  On the Friday, November 4th I published an essay on the Libertarian Leanings blog stating my intention to vote for Donald Trump and the reasons for my choice.  Simultaneously, a link to the essay was established on the Libertarian Leanings Facebook page.  I went to Facebook and clicked on the button "boost" the post.  My ad was accepted and I began to see increasing numbers of "people reached" by my Facebook entry.

Then, inexplicably, I received notification that my ad was rejected.  I appealed the rejection, asking why the ad was rejected.  I got a reply saying that after further review my ad was acceptable.  The display showing number of people reached resumed its upward progress, and for an added bonus the boost button offered me the opportunity to add to advertising budget and reach even more people.  I took it.  Wrong move.

Clicking on the boost button got the ad rejected again.  Here is the exchange between me and Facebook.

What you submitted Nov 4, 2016

Ad ID

6060171929831

Additional Information

I'd like to know specifically why the ad was rejected. What profanity should be removed? What viewers were harrassed, or whose racial, ethnic, or other attributes were disparaged? Our reply Nov 5, 2016 Hi Tom,

Thank you for notifying us about your ad disapproval.

We've reviewed your ad again and have determined it complies with our policies. Your ad is now approved.

Your ad is now active and will start delivering soon. You can track your results in Facebook Ads Manager.

Have a great day!

Did you find our support helpful? Please give us feedback

Thanks, Michael Facebook Ads Team >On Fri Nov 4, 2016 16:06:03, Tom Bowler wrote: >Ad ID : 6060171929831 >Additional Information : I'd like to know specifically why the ad was rejected. What profanity should be removed? What viewers were harrassed, or whose racial, ethnic, or other attributes were disparaged? > Your reply Nov 6, 2016 So now that you've reconsidered my ad and decided that it complies, and offered me the option to boost it, you've rejected the boost for the same reasons you rejected the original ad. Can you explain that to me?

Apparently, appealing the decision was no longer an option because the ad had been appealed once and then ultimately denied.

I was annoyed, but in the end I prevailed.  In spite of Facebook's efforts at blocking my message, I was able to get Donald Trump elected!  Of course, it's within the realm of possibility that other factors contributed to Trump's victory.  In any event, I didn't bother to pursue the issue of my rejected Facebook ad.

And then, on February 20, 2017 I received five identical emails from the Facebook ad team notifying me that my advertising account was disable

"Ad Account Disabled for Policy Violation
From Facebook Ads Team advertise-noreply@support.facebook.com              
Sent Mon, Feb 20, 2017 12:26 pm
To Tom Bowler [redacted]*

Header Ad Account Disabled for Policy Violation
Account Id: [redacted]*

Hi Tom,

Your ad account has been disabled for promoting ads which violate our Facebook Ad Guidelines.

Any ads you are running under the Ad Account ID listed above have been turned off. If you believe this has been a mistake, please contact us.

We also suggest reviewing our e-learning Blueprint module to better understand Facebook Ad Guidelines."

*Account Id redacted by the Libertarian Leanings security team

There was a button that said I could "Learn More."  The button took me a form where I could sign up to learn by providing my name and email address.  I decided I'd pass on the educational opportunity.  Five messages.  In case I missed the point.  I replied to one of them:

From: [redacted]*
To:
Subject: Policy Disabled Ad Account Help

Account Admin Name: Tom Bowler
Account Id: [redacted]*
Account Admin Email: [redacted]*
Is this your account?: Yes
Advertiser Account ID: 10152309798028414
Please provide information that will help us investigate: I haven't boosted any of my posts since November 4th when my boost was inexplicably rejected. I was never told why it was rejected, just as there is no indication why you are disabling my account at this time. I would like to know why, but only out of curiosity. I have no plans to spend money advertising on Facebook in the future.

*Account Id and email address redacted by the Libertarian Leanings security team

Oddly enough, later that afternoon I was given a reason that my original boost was rejected. And then rejected again after it was temporarily given a pass.

Your Ad Is Not Delivering
From Facebook notification+odv=ofg1@facebookmail.comhide details
Mon, Feb 20, 2017 5:26 pm
To Tom Bowler [redacted]*

Your Ad Is Not Delivering

Your ad's image contains too much text which is preventing delivery of your ad to your audience. Click any of the links below to manage your ad, and make changes to reduce the amount of text in your ad's image to fix this issue.

The following ad needs your attention (1) View Ads

Account: Tom Bowler Campaign: Post: "I will be voting for Donald Trump next Tuesday...."Ad Set: Post: "I will be voting for Donald Trump next Tuesday...."
Boosted Post: Post: "I will be voting for Donald Trump next Tuesday...."

Three days later, on February 23rd, I got a note from Mary of the Facebook Ad Team explaining nothing.

Facebook info+j3r1n1sa.aeaskwoqp4bua@support.facebook.com
Re: Policy Disabled Ad Account Help From Facebook info+j3r1n1sa.aeaskwoqp4bua@support.facebook.comhide details
Thu, Feb 23, 2017 7:25 am
To Tom Bowler [redacted]

Hi Tom,

Thanks for reaching out to us. Your account has been disabled for not following Facebook's Advertising Guidelines.

Ad accounts are evaluated for policy compliance and quality of ad content. When accounts have run ads that are not policy compliant, they are disabled.

Your account was disabled for running misleading ads that resulted in high negative feedback from people on Facebook. Our goal is to provide the highest quality user experience. We reserve the right to reject any advertising that we deem contrary to these objectives. Similarly, we reserve the right to close an account creating ads contrary to these objectives.

For this reason, if any of your ads have been removed or your ad account has been disabled, we will be unable to reactivate either. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Please consider this decision final.

Thanks for your understanding,

Mary
Facebook Ads Team
Facebook

I replied to Mary of the Facebook Ad Team:

-----Original Message----
From: Tom Bowler [redaced] To: Facebook
Subject: Re: Policy Disabled Ad Account Help   Hi Mary,
Thanks for your reply. Sadly, you have not answered my question. Specifically, why was my account disabled? To say that my ads were misleading provides no information. What ad? How was it misleading? What was the substance of the negative feedback?
I'm suspicious because the last thing I attempted to advertise on Facebook was a post explaining my vote for Donald Trump. The post was not so much a plug for Donald Trump as it was a slam of Hillary Clinton. That was November 4th. Then three months later you decide to disable my account. No advertising in the meantime.
Is this part of Facebook's crackdown on "fake news?" The sequence of events leads me to only wonder if it was my extremely negative view of Hillary Clinton that was considered "misleading" by the Facebook Ads Team. Undoubtedly there are some in the Facebook community who would find the appearance of so a negative view of Hillary Clinton on Facebook something less than "the highest quality user experience." Is that the real problem?
This is not an appeal of your decision to disable my account. When the ad for my November 4th post was rejected, I immediately decided that I had purchased advertising on Facebook for the last time. That decision is final.
That said, I would still like answers to my questions and I believe I deserve them. What ads were misleading? In what way were they misleading? What was the substance of the negative feedback?
Sincerely, Tom Bowler

  Mary from the Facebook Ad Team replied the next morning:  

Re: Policy Disabled Ad Account Help

From: Facebook info+j3r1n1sa.aeaskwoqp5kle@support.facebook.com
Fri, Feb 24, 2017 8:40 am
To: Tom Bowler [redacted]

Hi Tom,

After careful review, I’ve determined that we’re unable to take further action regarding this matter.

Thanks,

Mary
Facebook Ads Team
Facebook

  After careful review, no explanation -- none forthcoming, and none needed really.  Facebook's fight against Fake News was a transparent ploy to suppress conservative and libertarian viewpoints, or anything that might have negatively impacted Hillary's presidential aspirations.  This was exactly what President Obama was asking Zuckerberg to do.  And so the good folks at Facebook took action,but their effort failed.  While they might have limited the reach of Libertarian Leanings and others like me, they were unable to suppress Hillary.

 

Part 1

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 004 – Candid Cantwell (Part 1)

 

Part 2

LIVE from Seg! Ep. 004 – Candid Cantwell (Part 2)

 

Please donate!

1433 Rescue Fund

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post LIVE from Seg! Ep. 004 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/4d710674-07f7-4627-8ed3-c5a2c2ee841d.mp3

Call between Mike Enoch and Christopher Cantwell from the Albemarle Charlottesville Regional Jail on 9/20/2017.

 

1433 Rescue Fund

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Letters From a Charlottesville Jail Episode 15 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

*Chris is moved out of isolation onto a cell block with the other Unite the Right political prisoners

*Leftists line up to support Communist dictator Kim Jung Un after he calls Trump a “dotard”

*Chris’ first meeting with James Fields

*Valerie Plame & Blame for America’s Wars: Jews, Oil or ‘Spreading Democracy’?

JasonKessler.us

Please contribute! https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Cantwell and Kessler- Meeting James Fields, Kim Jung Un’s “Dotard” Remark, Valerie Plame Calls Out American Jews appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Piece by a staff member, unless directly mentioned by name below giving his thoughts, not Cantwell’s words

 

Usually when someone accuses someone of a crime, there is a police investigation. The police don’t need to prove the person did it, just that they have enough evidence (probable cause) to suspect that the person did the alleged crime(s). Then the police ask a prosecutor to file charges. In more serious cases, a grand jury indictment is needed to seek charges.

 

That process is in place to help protect people’s rights. If not, for example, someone could have found a Unite the Right flyer, claimed they stumbled upon an after party and got raped by all the speakers listed on it. Then all of them would be in jail waiting there till their court date.

That sounds crazy right? Well, that’s what happened to Cantwell.

 

Police did not seek the warrants that led to the arrest of white supremacist Christopher Cantwell this week, documents reviewed by The Daily Beast show.

The pepper-sprayed protesters swore to a local magistrate they were attacked by Cantwell, and the magistrate issued three felony warrants based on their accusations. Kristopher Cheney Goad and Emily Gorcenski accused Cantwell of illegal use of gasses and injury by caustic agent or explosive. The warrants did not originate through an investigation by Charlottesville, the University of Virginia, or state police.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/protesters-got-christopher-cantwell-arrested-cops-didnt-even-try

 

Emily Gorcenski had plenty of opportunity to report her alleged “assault” to police. In a video Emily made after allegedly getting pepper sprayed, she went up to a line of cops at the Tiki March to harass and badger them, but at no point did she tell them Cantwell pepper sprayed her. She didn’t even bother to tell her livestream audience that Cantwell did it. Which makes no sense, because as obsessed as she is with taking down the alt-right and Cantwell, you would think she would scream that to the rooftops if she could bring down a prominent Alt-Right leader.

One might make the argument that she didn’t mention him by name, because she wanted him to be caught, but that is clearly untrue, because she made a video to her followers (falsely) claiming that Richard Spencer was arrested and that Cantwell was about to be arrested.

 

Saturday afternoon, following the riots in Charlottesville, I heard via some tranny lunatic’s livestream that there was a warrant out for my arrest for a class 6 felony. I doubted the source and attempted to contact the Charlottesville Police Department to confirm or deny this rumor. The PD said they could not tell me if I had a warrant, that I could only do this by going to a magistrate.
https://christophercantwell.com/2017/08/17/felony-self-defense/

 

Cantwell had no idea that she knew that because she was the one who pressed charges, since he never pepper sprayed her. However, Emily knew exactly who he was. The night of the Tiki Torch March, while the Alt-Right was getting ready, there’s video of her calling out Cantwell by name and mocking him for his Walmart meetup and telling him she showed up late to it.

Then why then did she claim Cantwell did it?

Later that night after the Tiki torch march finished, a photograph of Cantwell pepper-spraying an anonymous man (“Beanie Boy”) became viral on the Internet. Cantwell even made the photograph his header on his personal facebook page. Emily Gorcenski must have saw it as her chance to bring down the rising star of the Alt-Right, by realizing if he sprayed “Beanie Boy,” she could lie and claim he sprayed her also.

Just as Emily and Goad had lied to the magistrate that Cantwell had pepper-sprayed them, someone had made a false 911 call that Cantwell had brandished a gun at the Walmart meetup earlier that Friday. Around 10 am, Cantwell decided to meetup with some fans in a Walmart parking lot before they would go to an undisclosed location where he would talk with a Vice crew. However, the area was quickly surrounded by cops and a few minutes later the media showed up. Emily Gorcenski was also in the crowd, stalking Cantwell.

 

https://twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/896060176922431488

 

Emily claimed in a later video that she didn’t do it and the person who did made the call from inside the Walmart, which begs the question, how did she know that?  Gorcenski also claimed on twitter that after the Walmart incident, Agent Wolfe (sp?) from the FBI called her, since he had received information that she was up to no good because she is affiliated with the terrorist Antifa group. Also, many people are wondering why she didn’t livestream at the Walmart, since she loves to attention whore. (I guess we’ll have to wait till they’re done looking at the security cameras to answer that.)

 

(And on another note:

https://twitter.com/TaylorNBC29/status/896051427730051072
While Taylor Gleason correctly tweeted about the incident, in her news story, she changed the facts:

Officers responded to the store around 12:20 p.m. Friday, August 11, after receiving a report that customers were concerned with a group of people pointing guns in the store’s parking lot.
http://www.nbc29.com/story/36116210/albemarle-county-police-respond-to-incident-at-walmart

I guess she changed it to multiple people to make it sound scarier to her readers)

 

Cantwell has said multiple times that Emily Gorcenski is an unreliable witness because she is a tranny and many who have read and heard her inane ramblings are starting to think the same way. She has made multiple false claims including that Richard Spencer got arrested, Cantwell was the only one who used pepper spray at the Tiki torch march, Basked Alaska maced himself (she said that after being shown the video evidence) and that she is not a man among many ludicrous claims.

Emily Gorcenski must have learned an important lesson that day. Cantwell had his body camera on and the cops let him go since it was obviously a false report. She must have realized that cops look at evidence and facts, so she went to a magistrate with Goad, probably hoping that Cantwell would wrongly think Goad was the “Beanie Boy” (aka the person who he sprayed) and cop a plea. If police had investigated her and Goad’s claims about the Tiki Torch incident, no charges would have been brought against Cantwell, because videos taken at the event clearly show that Emily Gorcenski and Kristopher Cheney Goad had lied under oath.

Currently Cantwell sits in a cage based on their false testimony. How long will the ZOG legal system keep him there for crimes he did not commit?

 

If you can please help by donating at https://goyfundme.com/projects/1433-rescue-fund/

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post The Walmart Parking Lot Incident (Why Emily Gorcenski didn’t go to the Police) appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

Call between Christopher Cantwell and Mike Enoch.

https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/36eaf2ca-1e00-41a1-a01f-7a8ad28a493a.mp3

Please donate!

1433 Rescue Fund

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Letters From a Charlottesville Jail Episode 14 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.

https://christophercantwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/27c580a6-e8ef-4e44-8769-77eef963144e-1.mp3

Call between Cantwell and Enoch

 

Please donate!

1433 Rescue Fund

 Source: Christopher Cantwell

The post Letters From a Charlottesville Jail Episode 13 appeared first on Christopher Cantwell.