Have you heard of “Boy Toy”? It’s a book Dover School Library retains on its shelf. The plot of Boy Toy is centered around the sexual abuse of a boy by his female teacher. Not only is the story filth but page upon page is laced with profanity.

Imagine content and words only fit to be written on the bottom of a toilet seat targeting these children’s minds. Such are the books recommended by UNESCO/UN, which influence government schools.

The path that our public school UNESCO/UN curriculums since WWII have traveled reminds me of the allegory of throwing a frog in lukewarm water so he won’t jump out before you boil him alive. Our youth have suffered this increasing heat of fatal indoctrination that is stealing many of our children’s minds while simultaneously striving to take away parental control. The goal is for the state to take sole possession of your children. These recommended books in the Dover scandal, along with many other thought our state and nation indicate the temperature in the boiling.

Teachers must follow the curriculum or lose their jobs. But at some point, the moral responsibility to protect children needs to supersede. I can smell the “moral pollution” the Dover school is propagating to minors all way here in Merrimack. All my life, I have tried to live up to the moral: “ If you see something wrong and you don’t oppose it, then you become part of it.” If Dr. Harbron and School Board members are sitting on the fence, ignoring such garbage, they would certainly do well to follow this moral.

Too many parents still don’t realize their children are in hot water. Google the 4 part series by Duke Pesta called The “SOCIALIST DESTRUCTION OF EDUCATION.” Seriously, consider getting your children out of public schools!

I recommend Dr. Pesta’s Freedom Project Academy.

 

The post Boy Toy: Public Toilet Morality appeared first on Granite Grok.

Elected officials in Vermont at both the state and federal levels will not have to take the stand and explain their part in a years-long multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme to defraud foreign investors. The state has settled out of court.

The Vermont state government is trying to sweep its EB-5 Ponzi-like scheme under the rug.

 

Just days before the state was devastated by continuous rainstorms, we were informed that the civil lawsuit against the state by eight EB-5 investors had been settled “out of court.” The storm’s statewide destruction moved the settlement entirely off the radar screen, possibly, forever.

…

Several of Vermont’s most senior political members — some now retired, and some senior state officials — may rest easy. They will not be called to testify about what would cause the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services to close down a state agency.

 

Then Governor Peter Shumlin and Vermont’s members of Congress all have ties to a development plan in Newport, Vermont, that used the government’s EB-5 program to swindle millions for foreign investors. But it wasn’t just a cash-for-green cards scheme. Vast sums of public money were redirected in the name of the swindle. The Newport Resort would need access, and crafty pols used theirs to spend your money on infrastructure.

 

If you missed it, back in early 2016, we reported on the funneling of millions of dollars, laundered through the Feds, to “projects” in Newport, Vermont.

From 2014 through 2015, over 17 million dollars was awarded by the FAA and DOT to remodel the airport serving the tiny town and the 4600 residents. It caught our attention (see Les Otten and the Balsams Boondoggle), introducing us to Bill Stenger and Ariel Quiros. ..

Senators Sanders (I)  and Leahy (D), and Congressman Welch [sold it as] Expansions “that will bring people for business, tourist and recreation opportunities throughout the region.”

They were very excited to announce all those funds secured for the runway and then a taxiway expansion(s) to this local airfield.

Leahy also personally complained to a Senate Committee about delays with the EB-5 program (being used to support the Ponzi scheme).

 

All while the project developers were giving campaign donations to these political allies.

 

Newport, Vermont resident Bill Stenger has his fingers in all these pies, and like any good “developer” has invested his fair share of dollars on the local crop of politicians. He gave $4000.00 to the campaign of the current governor, Peter Shumlin, and his resort project, Jay Peak, shows a $2000.00 donation to Shumlin in 2012.

He gave Patrick Leahy $4800.00 dollars in 2010

Peter Welch got $1000.00 dollars in 2014.

Ariel Quiros gave $2000.00 directly to Shumlin, $14,000.00 to the VT Democrat Party, and another $12,000.00 to the Vermont State Democrat Federal Campaign Committee- which funnels donations to support the campaigns of Vermont’s…Senators and Congresspersons.

And Q Burke Mountain Resort gave Shumlin $2K in 2014.

And according to this report, the same Jay Peak developers have donated a total of least 71,900.00 dollars to Vermont Democrats since 2011.

 

It looks like the Vermont Democrat party, the governor, a congressman, and two Democrat US senators were getting “paid” to support the schemes, but none of them will have to testify or explain what they knew and when they knew it.

In the end, over 800 foreign investors were swindled. An out-of-court settlement returns over 16 million to them, and while the summation of the civil suit hints at releasing close to 40,000 pages of documents related to the Ponzi scheme, does anyone expect to see proof of complicity between Vermont Democrats, corrupt developers, and the deliberate fraud perpetrated on the investors and US taxpayers?

I’m not holding my breath.

 

The post Are Sanders and Leahy Off the Hook for Their Part in Scheme to Defraud Foreign Investors? appeared first on Granite Grok.

The day after America celebrated its independence and its founding principles of self-governance and liberty, across the pond, Britain paid tribute to its values of collectivism and statism by commemorating the seventy-fifth anniversary of the National Health Service (NHS).

Children’s choirs sang “Happy Birthday” at a thanksgiving church service celebrating the NHS at Westminster Abbey. In attendance were the prime minister and the opposition leader, among others. The notion that the NHS is the closest thing the United Kingdom has to a state religion has never been truer.

However, behind the pomp and pageantry, the NHS is a god that has failed. The reality is that the NHS should be one of the United Kingdom’s biggest shames, as it constantly lets down both patients and staff while placing a substantial burden on the taxpayer.

The number of people waiting for treatment in England has reached unprecedented levels, with a backlog of 7.4 million—about one in eight of the population. Alarmingly, over 371,000 people have been waiting for over a year to receive treatment. The UK has significantly fewer hospital beds, doctors, nurses, CT scanners, and MRI units than the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development average. In addition, the UK has the second-highest rate of treatable deaths in Western Europe. How can anyone believe this system deserves to be eulogized?

Yet the NHS worshippers can’t admit that the system is failing as they hang on to the lie that the NHS is an example of socialism working. Instead, they turn to conspiracies, claiming the NHS is failing because the Tories are purposefully underfunding it to push privatization as a viable alternative. This is far from the truth: NHS funding is at record-high levels, above the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development average.

The argument that the Tories are trying to privatize the NHS has been pushed by mainstream news outlets for over four decades, from the Times in 1980 to the Byline Times in 2023, who claim that this is all a move to transition to a US-style system.

Nevertheless, the truth remains that when compared to not only the United States but also the rest of Europe, the UK continues to exhibit a significant level of statism in its healthcare system. As Dr. Kristian Niemietz, head of political economy of the Institute of Economic Affairs, points out,

After more than four decades of moral panic about secret privatisation plans, the UK still has an unusually state-centred healthcare system. Even if we include general practitioners, dentists, pharmacists and optometrists, spending on non-NHS providers still only accounts for about a quarter of the NHS budget. Spending on private providers (i.e., companies such as Bupa) in the way most people probably understand it accounts for less than one-tenth of the budget, a figure that does not show a rising trend. Private hospitals only account for one in ten hospital beds in the UK, compared to three out of ten in Austria, four out of ten in France, six out of ten in Germany, seven out of ten in Belgium and ten out of ten in the Netherlands.

Yet despite the facts, NHS fanatics would rather blame the issue on privatization boogeymen than address the point that the socialized centralized system has little accountability, cannot efficiently allocate resources, and provides patients with very little choice or freedom.

The reason why these NHS fanatics are fine with ignoring the facts is because they see the NHS as more important than human life and prioritize their dogma over reality. We could see this during the pandemic, when “protecting our NHS” was prioritized and the whole country clapped outside their houses every Thursday during the lockdown.

Meanwhile, very little coverage is given to the fact that the lockdown effects killed more people than covid, especially due to delayed treatments from the accumulated backlog. Instead of considering that the NHS’s inability to deal with the healthcare needs of Britain is a flaw in the system, NHS fanatics turn a blind eye.

NHS supporters are putting their fingers in their ears and are causing unnecessary suffering and costing people their lives. What does it matter that healthcare is “free at the point of use” when many are denied care altogether due to the waiting lists? While patients are quick to thank the NHS whenever healthcare goes right, they don’t apply the same logic to its countless failures. Those who dogmatically defend the NHS should try explaining things to the elderly person waiting for a delayed ambulance or the cancer patient waiting for delayed treatment.

Is it worth having worse healthcare outcomes in comparison to more market-based European countries to protect “our” NHS? Are they protecting people needing care or are they protecting the myths of socialism? The case seems to be the latter.

 

Jess Gill | Mises Wire

 

Author: Jess Gill

Jess Gill is a British libertarian political content creator. She is the Creative Director of Reasoned U.K. Jess creates political and economics videos on Tiktok and YouTube, where she has gained a following of over 30,000.

We heartily encourage reprints and shares of Mises Wire articles. If you wish to reproduce an article in your blog, magazine, radio show, newspaper column, classroom material, textbook, discussion group, website, or any other venue, please do so. The original publication source must be included in an appropriate place.

The post Lessons from Socilaized Medicine: “Britain’s National Health Service is a god that has failed.” appeared first on Granite Grok.

The natural (biological!) physical advantages men have over women, even mediocre C-team men like Will Thomas, are beginning to prove troublesome. For example, swimming’s World Governing body kicked Thomas out of women’s events last year.

 

In a seismic move for Olympic sport which will mean that American swimmer Lia Thomas can no longer compete in elite races, swimming’s rulemakers announced that transgender women must now establish that they “have not experienced any part of male puberty.”

Fina, world swimming’s governing body, also announced plans to establish a new “open” category of competition to include transgender women that, according to president Husain Al-Musallam, would involve “some of our biggest events.”

 

Post-pubescent males must compete as men or in the new melting pot category.

British Cycling had to give men the boot from women’s competition until they’d found a diplomatic way to explain why men can’t just decide they are women and win all their competitions. And it looks like Fina has found the out they were looking for – even the British government is beginning to see the light.

 

“This is the right and sensible decision to take,” said Nadine Dorries, the Culture Secretary. “Fairness must always take precedent over inclusion and should be unequivocal. Also important that trans women are able to compete in own class, this is the solution.” …

Al-Musallam said swimming’s new policy was “based on real science” and there is confidence it will prove robust against any legal challenge in being “necessary and proportionate to achieve a legitimate” objective. “Our athletes must come first,” he said. “Of course, I understand why transgender athletes would like to compete in a category of their choice. However, I have an obligation to every single one of our athletes.

“Equality is also a key principle for us. This is why we are faced with such a delicate balancing act. We have to protect competitive fairness, and also the past records and achievements.”

 

Real science!

Competitive fairness.

The nerve of these people. And now British Rowing has jumped into the queue.

 

Transgender women will not be allowed to compete in the women’s category of British Rowing events, the sport’s UK governing body has announced ahead of a change in policy due to come in later this year.

Only athletes “assigned female at birth” will be allowed to compete in the women’s category in competitions under its jurisdiction, or be selected to represent Great Britain or England at international events, British Rowing said in a media release published Thursday.

 

But will they ever kick intact men posing as women out of women’s locker rooms?

 

 

The post Transwomen Getting the Boot From One Women’s Sport After Another appeared first on Granite Grok.

Many Americans today are willing to buy what they are told. That is the lesson of covid. We bought what the government was selling, uncritically so. The American press, from the perspective of their value is their reporting of facts without bias, is dead.

The publication of news that is done has become propaganda. What we are seeing is manipulation of the news cycle for political advantage. And we are eating it up with a spoon. Our ability as citizens to view events with a critical eye appears to be gone or at best greatly diminished.

The current American regime is the most tyrannical, least constitutionally loyal in the nation’s history. Each time there is building momentum in the Biden corruption investigation there is a legal-media intervention. Here are some examples from the recent breaking bad story timeline.

1. On March 17th Hunter Biden admitted the laptop is his. The significance being the laptop’s content, while disgusting, is also valid evidence of his “business” dealings.

a. On March 18th Trump announced he was going to be indicted.

2. On June 8th the FBI FB 1023 documents came out showing $5 million for Hunter and $5 million for the big guy.

a. June 9th the Trump Mar-a-Lago indictment.

3. On July 31st we got Devon Archer’s testimony.

a. August 1st was the Trump January 6th indictment.

The point here is to illustrate the coincidence of coordination of breaking bad political news for the regime with the immediate follow-up of legal bad news for Trump. The appearance is a repetition of coordination between the Biden DoJ actions and the receipt and publication of bad political news for the regime. The timing of the distractions raises questions. Could this regime be more destructive of our republic?

Something we are seeing is egregious differences in prosecutorial zeal. We are seeing Trump believes, along with about half of the electorate, the 2020 election was flawed. The observations include but are not limited to:

· There were changes to election law allowed outside extra-constitutionally.

o Laws are supposed to be changed by the legislature, not by the courts.

· Zuckerbucks were a factor in polling place operation in some areas.

· There were bags of ballots showing up in some locations.

· There was the True the Vote data analysis.

· There were postal worker affidavits that were sat on until it was too late.

· There were the Twitter files.

· There was Facebook coordination, the violation of our first amendment rights through governmental coercion, and or coordination of social and news media outlet reporting.

One purpose of the prosecutions is to ensure discussing whether the election was fair, legal, and acceptable will no longer be tolerated. That is what these Trump indictments really are. They are intimidation, by the regime, of the opposition party. The message is; if the Democrats win, the election is fair… because the Democrats won. At best, this is the denial of Trump’s right to free speech, and by extension, that’s true of the rest of us.

We need to impeach the entire Department of Justice. Why did none of the indictments include any charge of incitement? If Trump is guilty of all this “stuff” and he caused January 6th, why is there no incitement charge? If the President broke the law, why did they not impeach him? The House did so twice without evidence… which resulted in a lot of wasted time and money, as well as two acquittals in the Senate.

From 2004 we went through the hanging chad fiasco. In 2016 it was Russia collusion. With respect to the election stealing claims, the shoe was on the other foot. The RNC has a video montage out about the complaints after those elections.

So now we cannot challenge covid, we cannot challenge climate, and we cannot challenge elections in which the Democrats win. We should stop and think about our direction of travel… We seem to be dangerously lost.

The Democrats need to own undermining confidence in our institutions. Our ruling elite seem to have decided; we, the electorates no longer have a say in anything that happens in this country. Think about it. The federal government determines how much water your faucet can put out, whether you can buy a gas stove and requires car companies to make only electric vehicles. The list is nearly endless… completely fascist and entirely Democrat driven.

They are increasingly bold in the use of every tool of government to suppress dissent. They are taxing us to increase their power to suppress us. That’s the definition of tyranny.

Read the Declaration of Independence… It contains a list of tyrannies of the King… It articulates what we tried as remedies and explains why independence was the required next step. How is today’s situation so much different?

The Trump indictments are problematic. Should there be a conviction, it will move us closer to dissolution of the nation by half. There is a large portion of the country which will not accept a conviction of Trump on these charges by the political opposition.

The American system of government only works if the losers of elections consent to be governed by those who won the election. The actions going on now may well result in a large portion of the country withdrawing their consent. That is what happened with the Civil War.

The problem with this election is there are now so many people who believe the electoral system is so corrupt and Democrats have so much partisan control of the voting system that we no longer trust the outcome. Many believe the courts stymied the submission of evidence of wrongdoing instead of airing the grievances and adjudicating the facts.

The American republic is rooted in federalism and it only works when we believe in and support the American values and principles. We are traveling quickly down a very dangerous road.

The post So, We Cannot Challenge COVID, We Cannot Challenge Climate, and We Cannot Challenge Elections in Which the Democrats Win? appeared first on Granite Grok.

We all want to protect the environment. But lefty pols are making reckless promises to “transition” entirely to renewables — wind and solar — within a few years. Never mind that Joe Public will get clobbered with huge electric bills, blackouts, unaffordable car prices, and layoffs in many industries. Getting to green nirvana on the Left’s timetable will be hell for ordinary people.

When politicians go green, vowing zero carbon, the public should see red.

Some 10 million New Yorkers who rely on Con Edison for their electricity were warned last week that their electric bills are going up 9% next month and could double by 2025. A $70 bill will surge to over $140. Ouch. That could keep you from turning on your air conditioner or clothes dryer. (RELATED: FRANK LASEE: The Climate Hucksters Are Saying The Quiet Part Out Loud — They Want Fewer People)

You can thank the state’s Democrats, including former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Gov. Kathy Hochul, who are pledging to make Con Ed 100% carbon-free and nuclear-free as well. The ruinously expensive transition has to be paid for by Con Ed’s consumers. That’s where much of the $11 billion in rate hike money is going.

Worse, expect more rate increases and blackouts ahead because, in New York, wind and solar will fail to produce enough power to meet the public’s needs, according to energy expert Daniel Turner of nonprofit Power the Future. When supply falls short of demand, prices rise.

Energy titan Harold Hamm explains in his eye-opening must-read book “Game Changer,” “I’m not against renewables. I am against dismantling the current system for another system that doesn’t exist yet.” Hamm, founder and chairman of petroleum company Continental Resources, explains that “net zero” has become one of the Left’s favorite mantras. But “it has zero chance of working.”

The costly mistake New York is making is being repeated in other states. The North American Electric Reliability Corporation, a government-certified standard-setting group, cautions that around the country, fossil fuels are being removed from electric grids too fast to meet electrical needs.

The Electric Power Research Institute, an industry group, reports that technology does not yet exist to produce an adequate, dependable supply of electricity without carbon.

Biden’s climate ambassador John Kerry is being pilloried by the Left for admitting that “50% of the reductions we have to make to get to net-zero … are going to come from technologies that we don’t yet have.”

Politicians cavalierly push for net-zero, ignoring these facts.

The Pew Research Center finds that two-thirds of Americans want a mix of energy sources, while fewer than one-third think “getting the U.S. to net zero carbon emissions as quickly as possible” is important.

Like New York Dems, President Joe Biden is ignoring the commonsense majority. He vows to end fossil fuel production and use. Last week, Biden’s Department of Transportation floated radically increased fuel mileage standards, doubling them in less than a decade. DOT Secretary Pete Buttigieg boasted new standards “means more money in Americans’ pockets” and more energy security for the entire nation. Wrong on both counts.

These extreme mileage standards will force automakers to switch to manufacturing primarily electric vehicles, depriving customers of choice and forcing cash-strapped buyers to settle for a clunker instead of a new car.

Electric vehicles cost about $53,000.

Biden’s romance with electric vehicles is a gift to China. It controls 85% of the metals needed to make EV batteries, according to Hamm. (RELATED: DAVID BLACKMON: Biden’s EV Push Could Be The Death Of American Automakers)

China is also flooding Europe with cheap EVs, and they could capture 20% of the European EV market within the next few years. Hamm predicts the U.S. is next. No wonder the United Auto Workers are stalling endorsing Biden.

Citing heat waves and wildfires, New York Times alarmists warn against supporting a Republican for president in 2024. The Times claims Republican contenders reject “the scientific consensus” that the United States “must transition rapidly to renewable energy in order to limit the most catastrophic impacts.”

Sorry. There is no scientific consensus on moving to net zero. Industry experts show it would cause severe, self-inflicted hardships.

Next time you vote, size up each candidate’s energy IQ. Avoid the ideologues who don’t give a damn whether you can pay your electric bill, afford a new car or even keep your job. The environment can be protected without destroying America’s standard of living.

 

| Daily Caller News Service

 

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York and chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths. Follow her on Twitter @Betsy_McCaughey. To find out more about Betsy McCaughey and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

 

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 

 

The post Dems’ ‘Net Zero’ Fantasies Are Pie In The Sky appeared first on Granite Grok.

The Babylon Bee is a popular parody website where, occasionally, its humor becomes a reality. If you see a headline from The Bee, you have to remind yourself that it is based on humor, but in the last few years of Biden’s America, the Bee tracks closer to reality than most would like. The Biden Administration has no clue or perception of the truth. They feel they can say or do whatever they want, the media will support them, and Americans will buy their narrative. So far, the Biden approach has worked, but it appears the House of Cards is crashing in on the Biden Cartel.

Just last week, in two separate events, Joe Biden and his Vice President, Kamala Harris, spoke about Bidenomics and the state of the economy. Biden was bragging about the success of his policies bringing about historic recovery. At the same time, Harris told how most Americans are a $400 expense away from bankruptcy. Harris’ assessment does not sound like a rosy economic recovery. This disparity makes you wonder if these two ever speak with each other.

Another more serious faux pas occurred this week and involved the Secretary of State Antony Blinken. This is not the first time Blinken had thrown a curve ball when a fastball was called for. The subject involved is the jailing by Vladimir Putin of his primary political opponent.

It was revealed, in a typical Friday news dump, that Russia has just announced that government opposition leader Alexey Navalny was convicted on charges of “promoting extremism.” The sentencing makes it official, and he will serve an extra 19 years in prison in addition to the nine years he’s already serving for so-called parole violations, fraud, and contempt of court. It’s Biden-esque.

The reaction on X, the new Twitter format, by Antony Blinken, was swift and showed an ignorance of the unethical actions of his Boss, Joe Biden, who is employing the same tactics as Putin against Donald Trump. Blinken took to X and posted a condemnation of Putin’s actions against Navalny. 

Blinken Tweeted on X:

“The United States strongly condemns Russia’s conviction of opposition leader Aleksey Navalny on politically motivated charges. The Kremlin cannot silence the truth. Navalny should be released.”

You will not find any such tweet by Blinken condemning Biden for the same action as Putin against Trump. This omission shows how tone-deaf Blinken is or how hypocritical Blinken and the rest of Biden’s Administration can be. It is bizarre and plays on the fact that half of the American population is ignorant of the reality of the news cycle and relies on the gaslighting they are fed from the White House.

We have discussed ad nauseam the lack of credibility of the Biden White House, and they continue to build on their book of lies. It is a sad statement of today’s political climate, but it can only be done with the support and collaboration of the mainstream media. If Joe Biden has shown the affinity to do one thing well, it is his use of the volatile atmosphere that a diametrically aligned country will present. The great unifier has actually proven to be the greatest divider.

The post Biden And His F-Troop Make Babylon Bee Look Credible appeared first on Granite Grok.

The government got one right on light bulbs. Therefore the government is right/truthful as a rule, and conspiracy theorists are wrong about most things, including Ivermectin.

We want to thank Joseph Mirzoeff for this Contribution – Please direct yours to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
You can review our ‘Op-Ed Guidelines‘ on the FAQ Page.

See Nuremberg 2 on protocols which included hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

Nuremberg 2 and the related US law explain the reason for the national government’s counterproductive propaganda against these two – the COVID “vaccine” experiment (EUA) was illegal with alternatives available.

Please also consider Nuremberg 1, 7, and 10, in relation to further national government COVID-response: abuse.

See attached matrix for NH’s appalling COVID “vaccine” results:

 

 

1) See also this on group-insurance results, from which one can infer the COVID danger was exaggerated and the COVID “vaccines” were dangerous to our normally healthiest demographic (employed people).

2) And this on CDC and FDA criminality.

3) And this on widespread hospital medical malpractice, coincidence with national government perverse incentives (in Medicare and Medicaid):

In Cheshire County, eight people died with COVID in 2020, fewer than one per month (10 months).  COVID “vaccines” began in NH December 14, 2020.  During 2021 and 2022, 123 died with COVID in Cheshire County, more than five per month.  At Keene Center (roughly 85 residents), 10 died of COVID in the month following their December 30 “vaccine” clinic (vs eight in 10 months, 70,000+ residents).

Recently exposed (FOIL) Pfizer data sent to FDA showed that the third most frequent adverse event of the “vaccines” was COVID itself.  See the Daily Clout for continuing other details in this exposure.

The three articles cited above reflect what was known in late 2021.

How long will you two (Dan and Sean and the Keene Sentinel) continue to be willfully blind?

 

Edited from an Email to Dan and Sean at WKBK Radio

 

 

The post Conspiracy Theories vs Government Practices, What Was Known in 2021 appeared first on Granite Grok.

Forget the foreplay; Mike Pence is a weasel. His VP staff was littered with left-wing insiders who deliberately undermined the Presidency of Donald Trump so that they could have themselves a President Mike Pence. It seems unlikely Pence knew nothing about it.

Yes, Tucker Carlson exposed him, but since then, the evidence of his subterfuge, whether as principle or patsy, continues accumulating.

The most recent revelation is that Pence knew he could decertify the sketchy election and send the electors back to the states. But if he had done that, the US House would have re-elected Donald Trump via the 12th Amendment. The Dems didn’t want that, nor did the Neocon Never-Trump Establishment. They’d been working for four years to unseat the man and replace him with Pence.

Where’s the proof? Congress amended the Electoral College Act so the VP could no longer do what Pence should have done. There’s no reason to amend it unless Pence had the authority, which he did. He also had an obligation, but it was not the people or the Constitution. It was to the Donor class and Machine Politicians. That’s why he should not be President, but since you asked, Emerald Robinson has “receipts.”

 

“Do you know Olivia Troye? Do you know Jennifer Williams? Do you know Katherine Seaman and Josh Pitcock?”

 

• Let’s begin with Mike Pence’s least favorite question: “Why did you insist that President Trump fire his National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in the opening days of the administration?”… It’s likely that Strzok was the one who pushed for VP Pence to fire Flynn because we know that Peter Strozk’s assistant was Katherine Seaman — the wife of Mike Pence’s chief of staff Josh Pitcock. We also have the text exchanges between Strozk and Page discussing infiltrating the Trump White House in great detail.
• A State Department official named Jennifer Williams was placed on Pence’s staff in April of 2019 — which was just in time to get involved in the Ukraine call and the subsequent impeachment. … Just imagine being a few months into your new job in the White House only to volunteer to testify against the President in an impeachment trial over phone calls you didn’t like.
• The worst mistake that President Trump made during his administration was probably turning over the COVID Task Force to VP Mike Pence — because Pence turned it over to his chief of staff Marc Short and Marc Short turned it over to a little known national security official with no medical expertise. If you want to know the name of the person most responsible for unleashing the Dr. Fauci vaccine nightmare on America then remember the name of Mike Pence’s “COVID advisor”: Olivia Troye. … who regularly appears on TV now with a framed picture of Dr. Fauci hanging prominently behind her in her house. [After being fired] Troye then started a personal grift operation called the Republican Accountability Project — in which she came out of the closet as a full-time political operative for the Democrat Party.
• Why did Pence and his staff spend four years hobbling the Trump Administration? Why can’t people believe that the GOP would try to impeach Trump to clear the way for Pence? Most Republican voters have never met the big GOP donors — and have no idea what they do with their money. The big donors wanted a Mike Pence/Nikki Haley ticket in 2024. They don’t really care what GOP voters want, and they never have. These are the people who pushed Jeb in 2016. And Paul Ryan before that. And Dan Quayle before that. Pence is a creature of the GOP donors, not an America First patriot. That much is obvious now. Pence was added to the Trump ticket to restrain Trump’s populism — and that’s what he tried to do for four years. When

 

Or you can go back to the Tucker Carlson beating; either way – it is clear Mike Pence, who had no backbone s governor, or as VP, would not be much different as a President at a time when we need someone who will push back on the political machine hell-bent on robbing us of our rights and liberties by any means of which they can conceive.

Sorry, one more.

 

In the days leading up to J6, I was informed by trusted sources that Pence wasn’t going to contest the rigged electoral college results. I couldn’t believe it. How could he backstab 74 million people & allow fraud to overthrow our executive branch?

But then I was told why…

He cut a deal with the Koch fundraising network to be their lead horse in 2024 if he backstabbed Trump and the MAGA movement in 2020.

To those that say he didn’t have the power to contest fraudulent ballots and allow state legislatures to conduct further review, then why did they change the Electoral College Act in 2022 to explicitly state the VP could no longer facilitate that exact process?

Because Pence could and he knew it, but he took the blood money anyway. 

 

I’m a big fan of AFP, but they’ve been sending many mailers, making the case that Trump can’t win. AFP National gets a lot of money (or used to) from Koch. Given what we know, a Koch/Donor class backroom deal with Pence isn’t out of the realm of possibility.

 

The post If You Support Mike Pence You Should Maybe, Probably Stop … appeared first on Granite Grok.

On August 31st at 6:30 PM at Marion Gerrish Community Center,  39 W. Broadway in Derry, NH, those who desire the truth about why our government continues to get more powerful while citizens lose more freedom should attend a PowerPoint presentation by James Perloff entitled: “ AN OLIGARCHY CONTROLS AMERICA — FACT OR CONSPIRACY THEORY.”

Don’t miss this opportunity to learn the facts that American patriots should consider before answering this question. Mr. Perloff will review the history of this “globalist oligarchy above government going all way back to the panic of 1907 to today’s Climate Change mandates in his presentation. For nearly three decades, he’s been a guest on hundreds of podcasts and radio shows.  Check out Perloff’s in-depth  research at his  2014 blog called” Pearl Harbor: Roosevelt’s 911.” Also, he has authored seven books, including, Shadows of Power,” an exposure of the Council on Foreign Relations’ influence over every administration since 1933: and also, Tornado in A Junk Yard, The Relentless Myth of Darwinism.  RSVP by email at rhodesmatthew431@gmail.com or at https://bit.ly/jp-event-2023-08-31   or call Matthew Rhodes at 207-391-0970.

The post An Oligarchy Controls America appeared first on Granite Grok.

The Climate Cult, infused with many millions to promote climate change stories as if they were unbiased, non-partisan political drivel, has lost its collectivist mind over July being hot. It’s been hotter, and that wasn’t your fault either.

Related: NASA: Water Vapor from Massive 2022 Underwater Eruption Could Warm Earth’s Surface for Years

 

Tony Heller has a clip from The Morning Post, May 8, 1912, about the prevalence of icebergs in the Atlantic. I also have a subscription to Newspapers.com, so I followed his link to check it out. Here’s the headline and subheading.

 

 

 

And here is an image of the full-page story.

 

 

 

If we zoom in on the reporting, we see that a few weeks earlier, the Titanic struck one of those icebergs and sank into infamy.

 

 

They also report that Greenland’s temperatures had been recorded at 94° degrees the previous summer.

 

 

The warm Greenland Summer caused the icebergs to multiply into one of which the Titanic collided. It was 94 degrees in Western Greenland in the summer of 1911, so let’s hop into a different way back machine and look at where atmospheric CO2 was in 1911 – 1912, given that it is the foundation of the climate cult’s mythology.

 

 

Not much to see except that it was a lot lower than it is today. While the media is reporting Global Boiling, the temperature across Greenland this week are milder than usual, running around 6-12 deg Celcius in the south. That’s 42° to 53° degrees Fahrenheit.

Not 94°.

There is an endless stream of hyperbolic headlines in the Machine Media about the temperatures in Greenland. None of them that I saw mentioned warming in 1911, which was nearly double that reported today.

It puts a hitch in their global warming step.

Most of the hottest days, months, and years on record were from that era before Global Warming was invented as a political ploy to undermine free-market capitalism.

Two more points we need to revisit. First, the actual drought is CO2.

 

 

 

And Second, the current percentage of CO2 and man-made co2 in our atmosphere.

 

Oh, and it was 94 degrees in Greenland in 1911, and CO2 was less than  300 ppmv. Today can’t even begin to compete with that.

 

The post Looks Like Global Warming Sank the Titanic … appeared first on Granite Grok.

America has always prided itself as a country of laws based on our Constitution and enforced equally regardless of the individual. That fundamental principle separates us from a Banana Republic like Cuba or Venezuela.

President Joe Biden has found a way to obliterate that separation, and his effort to destroy this great country has brought us closer to being a Banana Republic. Joe’s continued crusade to weaponize the Department of Justice and the FBI against his political foes has made us one of the greatest Banana Republics. The law is no longer blind but twisted to suit the needs of Biden and his administration.

We got a glimpse of the power of a corrupt government and DOJ when Biden unleashed that power on parents who disagreed with his Department of Education and the Teacher’s Union. We saw the power when the FBI implanted agents into Catholic Churches to uncover radical Catholics who may threaten the country. We saw the power when the President’s son and the Biden family were protected by the DOJ while concocting bogus laws to indict former President Donald Trump three times since Trump announced his re-election campaign. Under the control of the soon to be impeached Attorney General Merrick Garland, the DOJ has indicted Donald Trump three times on Federal criminal law violations. The three indictments, and the one modified, have been used to embarrass Donald Trump, force the former President to use $40 million on legal fees, and split his focus between mounting legal woes and his re-election campaign. The one thing that should concern Democrats is each time a new indictment comes down, Trump’s approval rating amongst Republican voters goes up and has drawn him even against Biden in the general election polls. The indictments have also been planned to mask the legal troubles of Hunter Biden and the mounting evidence of Joe Biden’s connection to his son’s extortion of money from foreign individuals and countries. The comparison between Joe Biden’s America and Banana Republics is in America, we typically let the election box be the means of electing our leaders. Under Joe Biden, he is threatening his political competition with jail time or at least a mountain of fake indictments that will break the financial backs of most people, but not Donald Trump. Maybe Trump speaks with a bit of tongue in cheek when he says he is one indictment away from securing the Presidency. Even if in jest, Biden should heed Trump’s words. Most legal pundits indicate how flimsy the current string of charges are. Most of the charges are antiquated and appear to be designed to confuse rather than convict. They are vague, nearly impossible to prove as many involve a defendant’s state of mind rather than actions. Jurors will be forced to delve into the mind of Donald Trump, and that is an untenable task. Americans who are aware of the Trump and Hunter Biden proceedings can see how differently the law and accountability are applied to both. It is enough to turn an average citizen am. Joe found the beanbag with no problem. Let’s see how he fares with a banana peel

The post America Has Slipped On A Banana Peel appeared first on Granite Grok.

Garnet Harper couldn’t get a doctor or hospital in Canada to perform a much-needed kidney transplant because he hadn’t received any vaccinations for COVID-19. He had viable donors, but Canadian Health Care policy prohibits transplants for the unvaccinated. He died at the age of thirty-five.

Related: Canadian “Coloring Book” Normalizes Assisted Suicide for Children

 

In February 2022, Garnet was diagnosed with stage five kidney disease. Two of Garnet’s brothers offered to donate their kidneys, but the hospital refused to consider them as Garnet would not disclose his vaccination status. 

Canada’s current public healthcare policy denies organ transplants to those who have not received at least two doses of the experimental COVID vaccine.   

As a result, on May 22, 2023, 35-year-old Garnet died of a bleeding stroke during his sleep, leaving behind his wife and five children. 

 

Someone in the Canadian Health Care system, knowing that Harper would soon shuffle off his mortal coil,  must have contacted a local organ donation agency.

 

In May, Trillium Gift of Life Network (TGLN), the Ontario organ donation agency, called Meghan Harper to harvest her husband Garnet’s organs as he lay dying because the hospital refused to provide organ transplants to unvaccinated Canadians.  

“They call you while you’re sitting next to your dying loved one and they ask you if they can have his organs,” Megan told independent journalist Monique Leal. 

 

TGLN was unaware of the patients medical status. They didn’t know he was denied a transplant, or so the story goes. Whoever had denied him one, or some bureaucratic Canadian Health Care flunky, didn’t bother to inform the donation agency, the result of which is this rather curious set of circumstances.

Connor Harper, unvaccinated, age 35, a married father of five, is ineligible to receive a transplant, but his unvaccinated organs would be a great gift to someone else once he dies. The news has resulted in a nationwide call to Canadians to refuse to donate their organs.

Pastor Henry Hildebrandt had some questions about discrimination of this nature. What’s next, he asks, denying Christians? It sounds absurd, but during COVID, Christians were denied their right to assemble while BLM and Antifa were praised for gathering to burn down black neighborhoods.

 

Are you an organ donor in Canada? I believe it’s time to put that on hold until our government stops fatally discriminating against its citizens. My heart goes out to the family of the late Garnet Harper and to Sheila Lewis who is still struggling to get care. pic.twitter.com/yzJ14JUby0

— Pastor Henry Hildebrandt (@aylmerpastor) July 25, 2023

 

A general call to change your organ donor status might work. Cut short and already typically inadequate supply. But this is The People’s Republic of Canada. They’ve got an organ donor program already. It’s called Medical Assitance in Dying (MAiD). With a tweak of the rules and a wink and a nod from the government, a growing bureaucratic army of caregivers will sweep out across the countryside to convince the disadvantaged and mentally deficient (definitions that broaden based on political priority or need) to give up their lives for the good of the corrupt banana republic Canada.

That’s me being cynical. I’d like to think that we’re past all the nonsense, but governments do not give up on schemes that marshall control. And while ours was created to protect rights, even it has managed, in a few short centuries, to flip that experiment on its head, mostly by using its institutions to convince people it knows better.

The COVID response was proof it does not, but not everyone or enough of anyone is convinced. And in the Great White Horth, they are killing people over, and in Canada, as Ontario MPP Randy Hiller notes, it is “Only the tip of the iceberg … Our governments are and have been engaged in social murder. Unfortunately, many people believe recognizing these facts and speaking out is more dangerous than becoming the inevitable next victim.”

It’s not something that makes them uncomfortable, so they’ve no problem with more of it.

 

The post Looks Like Medical Suicide Isn’t Canada’s Only Organ Harvesting Scheme appeared first on Granite Grok.

In 1964, Leonard Read wrote a genealogy from the perspective of a pencil, demonstrating the vast, complicated web of the structure of production that is handled by the division of labor on free markets. The pencil explained that no one knows how to make a pencil because of the myriad production processes involved:

My family tree begins with what in fact is a tree, a cedar of straight grain that grows in Northern California and Oregon. Now contemplate all the saws and trucks and rope and the countless other gear used in harvesting and carting the cedar logs to the railroad siding. Think of all the persons and the numberless skills that went into their fabrication: the mining of ore, the making of steel and its refinement into saws, axes, motors; the growing of hemp and bringing it through all the stages to heavy and strong rope; the logging camps with their beds and mess halls, the cookery and the raising of all the foods. Why, untold thousands of persons had a hand in every cup of coffee the loggers drink!

The pencil then detailed the remaining work required for pencil production, which included making flat cars, rails, and railroad engines; shipping the logs; developing communication systems; supplying heat, light, and power; building a factory; forging mining tools; mining graphite; and shipping the materials to one place. Continuing, it described the supplies needed to paint the pencils and the process of painting, labeling, and adding brass tips; mining zinc and copper to make the brass; and fabricating the eraser.

While the division of labor required to fabricate a pencil is impressive, consider how many more steps are required to manufacture complicated things such as smartphones or computers. Yet each step requires one particular resource—energy.

When people discuss fossil fuels, they typically weigh the pros and cons of the electricity in their houses and the fuel in their cars. They usually do not consider what was required to build those houses and cars—much less the pencils they use to write. Fossil fuel advocate Alex Epstein writes in his book Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal, and Natural Gas—Not Less about the machines needed to build houses:

Today’s unprecedented shelters are possible only because today’s shelter-building industry, like the food industry, employs a massive staff of fossil-fueled machine laborers that cost-effectively do incredible amounts of work for us.

These machine laborers include:

• excavation machines that enable one human to dig up and move massive amounts of earth to make room for the foundations of sturdy buildings;
• grading machines that enable one human being to easily flatten uneven, bumpy patches of land to make them suitable for large, level structures;
• lifting machines, such as cranes, that can lift enormous amounts of weight that, if they could ever be lifted before, took years of slave labor;
• the machines we call power tools, which enable human beings to combine their dexterity with large amounts of power for precision tasks such as hammering, fastening, and sawing;
• compacting machines that make the ground under buildings solid;
• cutting machines that clear trees to make way for human habitation;
• paving machines that build the amazing roads that interconnect our shelters;
• mining machines that extract all the raw materials involved in our amazing buildings, from iron and coal for steel, to aluminum, to copper, to sand; and
• high-heat machines used to transform mined materials into vital usable materials such as cement, steel, and plastics.

Without these completely unappreciated fossil-fueled machine laborers radically increasing humans’ productivity ability, high-quality shelter would be out of reach for the vast majority of people in what is today’s empowered world.

And that’s just the building of shelter.

A discussion of fossil fuels’ unique cost-effective benefits as they relate to house construction could easily stop there; however, if we also apply Read’s genealogy, it becomes clear that each one of the listed machines also relies on complex systems of machines and processes that require energy. In Read’s pencil analogy, he lists the hydroelectric power that runs the mill he discusses, but without the unique cost-effective energy source of fossil fuels, one could never reliably power every step of the process. This also applies to more complicated goods such as phones or computers. And as Epstein explained, the process of building the high-quality shelters that we take for granted today would be impossible without fossil fuels.

Speaking about the Austrian school of economics, Robert Murphy stated that “their capital theory and business-cycle theory are the best I have found.” The Austrian school’s capital theory is vital. While others ignore what is required for the structure of production, the Austrian school does not. Fossil fuels should be a priority in the world today—not because they are the most efficient at the level of the consumer good but because without fossil fuels the entire structure of production of the modern economy falls apart.

 

Connor Mortell | Mises Wire

 

Author: Connor Mortell

Connor Mortell received his BBA in finance from Texas Christian University and his MBA from Florida State University. Connor worked as a legislative aide in the Florida House of Representatives from 2019 to 2021 and then spent two years working as a teacher, initially teaching kindergarten and first grade, later teaching middle and high school. Connor was a 2023 summer fellow in residence at the Mises Institute and is currently a PhD student at Texas Tech University.

We heartily encourage reprints and shares of Mises Wire articles. If you wish to reproduce an article in your blog, magazine, radio show, newspaper column, classroom material, textbook, discussion group, website, or any other venue, please do so. The original publication source must be included in an appropriate place.

The post Not Even a Pencil Could Exist without Fossil Fuels appeared first on Granite Grok.

I want to thank all those who came out and voted in the special primary election on August 1st. I realize how precious your time is, and I am deeply grateful that you chose to use your time to exercise your Constitutional right to vote.

I am honored and humbled that you chose me to be your candidate to represent you in the New Hampshire Statehouse. I want to thank Jessica Sternburg for running a hard and, most of all, a very professional race. She is a bright and rising star in the Republican party. I look forward to the great things she will do in the future. As Republicans, we gave you a choice of candidates to choose from, whereas, on the Democrat side, they chose their candidate for you.

I want to make one thing perfectly clear. I am running to be YOUR State Representative. My complete focus will be to represent the issues and principles that are near and dear to your heart in Concord. I am running to serve the people of Northwood and Nottingham first and foremost in the State House. I will make it my priority to be on the House floor to vote and to represent your voice for every bill being presented.

This is going to be a highly contested race, probably like none other in our States history. There will be a variety of individuals and organizations looking to engage with you. Be assured that no matter what you see – hear or receive by mail – I will be YOUR representative and will be only beholden to YOU! Our Issues – Values – and Principles will always be my main priority.

I am honored to have received your vote of confidence last Tuesday. I will make you proud of that vote and I look forward to winning the General Election on September 19th.

 

The post Republican Candidate for the Special Election Rockingham District 1 James Guzofski appeared first on Granite Grok.

The Bud Light Boycott is celebrating four months of separating #woke from #working class America, and while the initial impact looked impressive, what – if any – have been the long-term effects? It didn’t even make InBev, the parent company, blink, but in the US, AB’s numbers have suffered,

 

Anheuser-Busch’s U.S. revenue plunged by 10.5 percent year-over-year, “primarily due to the volume decline of Bud Light,” according to the second-quarter corporate earnings data. Overall, revenue in North America declined by $395 million during the three-month period compared with the same time a year ago.

Operating profit also took a hit in North America, with two-thirds of the decline in profits being caused by market share performance. Productivity loss, marketing investments, and support efforts for wholesalers also contributed to the decline.

 

Not great, and some are suggesting they’ll never get that Blight volume back, but it isn’t harming AB globally.

 

In the global market, Anheuser-Busch performed much better.

The company reported a year-over-year worldwide revenue increase of 7.2 percent to $15.1 billion, buoyed by Corona and Stella Artois sales. Its organic growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization was 5 percent, topping the consensus estimate of 0.4 percent.

Anheuser-Busch noted that sales-to-retailers (STRs) fell by 14 percent, underperforming in the industry mainly due to the volume decrease in Bud Light. However, this was offset by the significant growth of its “mainstream portfolio” in Colombia and South Africa. In addition, China lifted the company’s second-quarter performance, as regional volumes surged 11 percent.

 

It’s not a total wash. “Shark Tank” star Kevin O’Leary is going to be using the lesson of Mulvaney and Bud Light as part of his business course.

 

This is an extraordinary case that I’ll be teaching in business schools across America this fall. To lose 25% of the market share has never been achieved.

We’re still talking about this situation months later, and they continue to lose share! pic.twitter.com/P4pDSN1lta

— Kevin O’Leary aka Mr. Wonderful (@kevinolearytv) July 31, 2023

 

Something about knowing your customer base before reaching out into uncharted rainbow waters – or anything that might crack the foundation of your brand and topple it off a cliff.

Does anyone know if the value of llamas has declined since Dylan Mulvaney pranced off to Peru?

 

 

The post It’s Been Four Months: How’s That Bud Light Boycott Working Out? appeared first on Granite Grok.

“What should I ask Mike Pence when we go see him?” I asked yesterday. “Ask him why he’s such a pompous arse,” my husband answers instantly. “Fair enough,” I say. “But seriously, what do you think?” I make a few suggestions:

* If the vice president had no role in electoral college proceedings, why did Congress just pass a law taking away the vice president’s role in future electoral college proceedings?

* If you become the Republican presidential nominee, how can you win the general when they already know you won’t contest the cheating?

* You can’t win the GOP nomination without at least some of the Trump vote—how can you get them to vote for you?

* How will a “pro-life cabinet” be any more qualified than the Biden one, where everyone was picked by race or sexual preference? For example, how will being anti-abortion secure the transportation network? Or help avoid another Afghanistan debacle?

I stop and ask hopefully, “What do you think?”

Clearly not impressed, my husband looks at me for a second and says, deadpan, “Ask him if he’s heard of Iago.”

One of Shakespeare’s most famous villains. Iago was Othello’s number two before turning on him. I doubt if Mike Pence has Iago’s skillfully manipulative mind, plus his obsessive jealousy and the bizarre love-hate thing seem more like Chris Christie to me.

“Thanks, I’ll think some more,” I say.

Still undecided, I hear that Pence has started selling Too Honest mugs. Which brings us back to: “Why are you such a pompous arse?”

Or maybe the real question is, why would I waste my time going to see him?

 

 

The post Questions for Mike Pence appeared first on Granite Grok.

I’m sure it’s difficult to imagine former NJ Governor Chris Christie sneaking up on anyone, but it’s happening. According to a Manhattan Institute poll, he has crept to within 2 points of Ron DeSantis in New Hampshire.

 

Ron DeSantis is facing a serious threat from Chris Christie in the New Hampshire Primary, according to a new poll from the Manhattan Institute.

The survey conducted last month shows just two points separate the Florida Governor and the former New Jersey Governor, with both men in low double digits.

DeSantis stands at just 13%, two points up on Christie’s 11%. Close behind them are Vivek Ramaswamy (8%), Nikki Haley (7%), and Tim Scott (7%). This shows a functional diffusion of the opposition vote to Donald Trump, who still leads comfortably at 34%, but far short of the majority.

 

It is worth noting that the RINO regalia chasing The Donald have collectively eroded his once significant margin over the second-place candidate. Not long ago, President Trump had close to 40 points on number two DeSantis in the Granite State, but the little nibblers have shaved his First in the Nation Primary lead down to a paltry 21 points.

Just a few days ago – on July 27th, (maybe you like the AG National Research NH poll better: Trump 41, DeSantis 11, Scott 8, Christie 8, Ramaswamy 6, Burgum 5, Haley 3, Pence 2, Hutchinson 1, Hurd

Scott and Christie are sneaking up on Governor Ron but not as much as The Manhattan Institute poll.

Over in Iowa, it’s Trump 44, DeSantis 20, Scott 9, Ramaswamy 5, Haley 4, Pence 3, Christie 1, Burgum 1, and Hutchinson 0.

Nationally,  a recent NYT/Sienna has Trump 54, DeSantis 17, Ramaswamy 2, Pence 3, Haley 3, Scott 3, Christie 2, Hutchinson 0, Burgum 0, Hurd 1.

So what does it all mean? Nothing. Not a damn thing. While Primary voters tend to be more reliable “voters” and inclined to pick a guy or gal and cling to them (bitterly?), one problem remains, and I mentioned it here yesterday. If you want to beat Trump with Primary voters, you “must do a better job at two things. First, prove to them that (you are a DC) outsider, and second that (you) can stay outside no matter how bad it gets.”

That’s a high bar very few even want to reach, and Donald Trump is one of the few to get there and in such a way as to earn all this attention from the DC mafia. They always tell you who scares them.

And the DoJ isn’t ginning up indictments against DeSantis, Scott, Christie, or Haley, so we can probably say they are considered safe insiders who will only get trashed if they become any sort of real threat.

We’re also still seven months out from New Hampshire’s primary.

The other thing about New Hampshire worth mentioning, when we talk about polling is that it is not a closed primary. Independents and the undeclared can vote in the Republican primary.  They may not always be polled but any snapshot of likely voters will include them. If it’s just registered Republicans, that’s still not telling because the uncounted influence of indys has been left out.

As I said, long way yet to go, especially for Gov. Christie who, outside of New Hampshire, isn’t sneaking up on anyone.

 

 

And a Hat Tip to Heather Mullins for the featured image. We met at Jim Berlo’s barbecue in July and she shared it with me. Shout out to @TalkMullins on Twitter (or whatever it’s called now).

 

When you can’t keep up with Trump and 6th+ place in the primary is already wearing you out… pic.twitter.com/go5qCEe9Tb

— Heather Mullins (@TalkMullins) June 22, 2023

The post Chris Christie Creeping up on Ron DeSantis in New Hampshire appeared first on Granite Grok.

There’s a new idea that’s being thrown around these days — the science of reading. I cringe at the phrase because it sounds like just another gimmick to fix things in schools, but the research actually seems to be pretty good.

There’s a great podcast series that explains what’s been going on over the last few decades and what research (“science”) has shown to work. It’s called Sold A Story. I highly recommend it.

The problem (as if there’s only one problem) is that most teachers are trained in college to use an approach to teaching reading called the cueing method. Not phonics. Emphatically not phonics.

The idea behind cueing theory is that it’s easier for children to learn to read if they start with whole stories and whole sentences and not try to read individual words. Teachers cover up words in a story and tell students to look at the picture and think of a word that makes sense, to look for clues about what the word is. The theory says that by practicing this approach, children can figure out how to read on their own. Research indicates that this isn’t how good readers learn to read but rather how poor readers try to compensate for not being able to read. It doesn’t work.

The science of reading says that while some kids can learn to read from cueing, the vast majority of students need direct instruction about the sounds letters make and how to sound out words. In other words, phonics. And when kids don’t learn to read in school, families with means hire tutors. (Some kids learn to read at home, of course.)

There’s a screening of a documentary called “The Right to Read” playing this Tuesday, August 8, at 11 am at Nashua High School South. They mention the science of reading in the trailer, and I am hopeful that it will be enlightening. There’s nothing more important than exposing schools’ failure to teach kids to read. Please tell all your friends about the screening. It’d be great to get a good turnout.

Keep in mind that they try new things every few years, and nothing seems to work. Will the science of reading bring new life to how schools teach reading? Maybe.

But there’s a deeper cultural problem, which is that most people have been raised to think it’s the responsibility of the schools, and not their own responsibility, to teach their kids to read. The idea that the government will solve your problems always reminds Ian of this humorous clip. The narrative has to change.

 

 

 

 

The post The Right to Read appeared first on Granite Grok.

RNC Research doesn’t get a lot right, in my opinion, but even a blind squirrel finds the occasional nut. This nut, it’s actually a bunch of nuts, makes for a great share when confronted with anyone who accuses you of being an election denier. It’s not just a keeper; it is meant to be shared.

Twenty-four minutes of liberals denying elections. Something you might want to play on the TV at Thanksgiving or share with one of your Democrat “friends” on Facebook.

Election deniers. Lots of them. And here’s a non-Twitter copy for the folks who deny Twitter their time, clicks, and attention (also embedded below the tweet).

Here are 24 STRAIGHT MINUTES of Democrats denying election resultspic.twitter.com/gDnNqfruWD

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 2, 2023

 

 

The post Twenty-Four Minutes of Democrat Election Deniers … Denying Elections. appeared first on Granite Grok.