Sunday • May 4 • 2025
Vol.XVII • No.XVIII
Manchester, N.H.
When people talk about Joe Biden’s ability or suitability to be President for another term, the focus is always on his age. There is always a debate about how old is too old for someone to sit in the Oval Office, but that is not necessarily a fair debate. Age is a number and does not tell the whole story. You can take two men or women born on the same day but have entirely different physical and cognitive levels. You must look at a broad spectrum of qualities to determine when someone cannot assume responsibility or do the job. In the case of Joe Biden, he is an example of an old 80-year-old with advanced stages of the aging process, both physically and mentally. But age is masking the more significant reasons that Joe Biden should not be President of the United States. Competence, Vision for the Country, Decision Making Ability, and Quality of Character are the characteristics of Joe Biden that Americans should be concerned with and which Democrats and the media are sheltering us from. That has to change, as the future of America hinges on the results of the 2024 Presidential Election.
I must preface my comments by confessing I do not believe Joe Biden is performing the duties of President. I do not profess to know who is pulling Biden’s strings, but he is clearly not in control of his faculties to make decisions. Joe Biden is the face of a more significant force, and he and his family are complicit in this effort to finish the job of transforming the country started by Barack Obama. The Bidens are performing their roles for the monetary gain their cooperation enables. It is a sad and dangerous situation with catastrophic possibilities for the country. Thirty-five to forty percent of Americans have no comprehension of the damage Joe Biden and his administration have done and its impact on our future. The ramifications are staggering, and our task is to illuminate the situation for those in the dark.
The Economy
Bidenomics is a farce and does not work for America. The out-of-control spending on programs like the Infrastructure and Inflation Reduction Act has put us into an inflationary period that harms every American, specifically low and middle-income families. Inflation is a false number that does not include the critical areas that impact all Americans, like energy and food. These two areas have the most significant impact on our spending ability and disproportionately affect lower-income people. Gas prices are rising quickly, and our options are limited now that we are again dependent on OPEC.
The Green Biden
Cars, air conditioners, washers/dryers, gas stoves, and any other appliance Biden can think of is a target for extinction as we know them. Americans are not ready for these expensive and inefficient alternatives in our lives. Biden now admits his Inflation Reduction Act was poorly named and is more accurately a green energy plan. He lied to America, but then we should have seen that coming. If America were ready to buy into the Climate Change crisis, the Government would not have to mandate or force these changes on us.
Biden Vision
Biden sees America as a more Progressive Socialistic country with Government making the decisions for us. America does not share this vision, so why do these Democrat politicians who do get re-elected.? Again, it goes to the ignorance of the American electorate.
Decision Making Ability
Look no further than the debacle in Afghanistan, his destruction of our Borders, ignoring Fentanyl and the American drug addiction epidemic, and the plight of the homeless to see the impacts of poor Biden decisions. He is on the wrong side of most issues that affect all Americans.
Quality of the Individual
Biden is a corrupt manipulator. He has managed to stay under the radar for fifty years and convince America that he has their best interest in mind. Joe does not. He has the Biden coffers in focus. He is using the arms of the Government against his challengers and adversaries. He is a proponent of our Education system indoctrinating our children and severing family ties to better control the youth.
Look past his age, and there is little that makes Joe Biden a good choice for President. Now we just have to convince Americans that our options are better. A tall task but one we must undertake.
The post It Is Not Just Biden’s Age appeared first on Granite Grok.
Recently, a Canadian professor, Katja Thieme, proclaimed, “Let. Little. Children. See. Penises. And. Vulvas. Of. Various. Ages. And. Sizes. In. A. Casual. Normalized. Totally. Safe. Way.” Professor Thieme proposes a simplistic form of exposure therapy to teach children about sexual themes, which is at best misguided and, at its worst, laying the foundation for children to be abused. Children in their early developmental stage are still learning to cope with the world around them and gradually try to make sense of their individual experiences. Early exposure to nudity can distort conceptions around sexuality, but more importantly intimacy. As a society, it is our duty to protect children and their psychological and social well-being.
There are certain topics that can potentially harm children. For example, ratings for television and movies are age restrictive. One of the main facets of an MA-17 movie rating is nudity. Even Hollywood agrees that young kids do not benefit from being exposed to nudity and sexual content, so why should we normalize such content to our children in day-to-day life? Children under 17 are not outright banned; they are allowed to see these films if accompanied by their parents. The responsibility to determine what children should be exposed to is on the parents, and parents have the right to make decisions for their children. However, parents who are comfortable with exposing their children to nudity and sexual material do not have a right to compel other parents to also expose their children.
Furthermore, with respect to childhood development, the introduction of sexual content, especially lacking proper context, can lead to cognitive distortions about body image, sexuality, and relationships. In my elementary school, when we first began puberty classes, they separated the boys and the girls. This was not an act of discrimination, but rather an effective way to only teach the children what they need to know. Young boys do not need to be educated on how to use pads and tampons or on how frequently females get their period and what getting a period means about your body. Additionally, exposure to sexual content in the presence of the opposite sex creates a discomforting environment where those potentially judging you sexually are present when you learn about sexual aspects of your own body. There are clear differences between young girls and young boys, and to this day I do not know what the boys were told, but I know it was specific to the male experience, something that will never be my reality.
Professor Thieme’s ideals also reflect a confused reality where adults and children are the same, a parallel to the misplaced view that men and women are interchangeable. Suggesting young girls should be exposed to naked males is traumatic. Puberty for young girls is a challenging and unique experience. We should empower them to learn about their changing bodies, not make them feel ashamed and vulnerable by exposing them to naked males. When you first start changing in public spaces, the first instinct is to cover up. This fear can prevent young girls from taking part in regular activities and impact social interactions. I know this firsthand from years of undressing in a locker room. It took me years to feel comfortable even to undress around other girls and to become comfortable with my body changes post-puberty.
Societal rules are in place to protect children from unsuitable content. This isn’t about sheltering, it is about preserving their innocence and ensuring that they develop into emotionally stable and socially mature adults. We must protect and guard the well-being of the next generation. Our responsibility is to ensure that children are exposed to content that nurtures rather than damages their growth.
Paula Scanlan | Daily Caller News ServicePaula Scanlan is a spokeswoman and advisor for Independent Women’s Forum (iwf.org) and a former swimmer at the University of Pennsylvania, where she was a teammate of Lia Thomas.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
The post The Left’s Latest Proposals Are Laying The Ground For Legalized Child Abuse appeared first on Granite Grok.
In the last election, some very powerful forces, whose sole goal was to seize power and bring about a new world order, defeated Donald Trump. (Kind of. I mean, maybe they stole it).
The central theme they used was simple: Trump is a very bad man; he is mean and nasty, and selfish. Never mind $2 dollar gas. Never mind, great jobs. Never mind, no wars. Never mind the biggest tax decrease in our history. Don’t look at his accomplishments-just focus on what bad things he said in his tweets.
Soooooo? How is that working out for you/us? I guess it is working so well that the same group thinks we/you are stupid enough to fall for the same pitch all over again.
Look at the Rino ads attacking Trump: they don’t talk about his policies, his accomplishments, his stand on the issue.
Nope. They follow the same in my mind tired- approach of calling him a bad man and saying to you, like you were three, “He is a very bad man. Don’t vote for a very bad man. (They show him saying that Sununu is “cookoo”…)
Here is a suggestion: why don’t we pick a president for what he can do for the country and not for what he says about the people he does not like? How about we treat the election like maybe we are smarter than they think and act the part by approaching this next election like I think we all know we should treat it like a “BUSINESS” and elect someone who can actually look after our interests and not the interests of those who want to destroy us.
In that vein, let’s take the subject of DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION and ask ourselves (utilizing an objective, rational, non-emotional businesslike approach) which is best for me; for us; for our children; for country; indeed, for our world:
1. A federal Government that is hell-bent on destroying us by replacing our Constitution and our country with what Klaus Schwab calls the Chinese template; by destroying our economy with the largest transfer of wealth and power from the middle class to a select few in the ruling aristocracy; by replacing American labor with illegal immigrant labor; by destroying our way of life and replacing it with pedophilia, child abuse, and mutilation; a federal government that is willing to gut our legal system to promote its Marxist ideology; or
2. A Federal Government that actually fulfills Lincoln’s resolve that Government should be “of the people, by the people, and for the people; a government that actually enforces our Constitution and the values it reflects; a federal Government that places prime value on the individual citizen and sees itself as protecting, promoting and defending the individual’s freedoms, rights and aspirations; a federal Government that actually believes in the sanctity of the Justice system and renders justice impartially and within the Bounds of the law.
To conduct such an analysis, let’s start at the beginning:
What is DEI?
1. DIVERSITY- just like BEST BUY, diversity means that if it’s white, erase it. White people are evil because they are white. The laws on discrimination don’t apply to them. Any amount of pain, suffering, or discrimination is ok against a person if they are white.
2. Equity: Equity means that society does not operate on skill or merit. It operates on racism: if you are white, you are by definition privileged; if you are not white, you are by definition not privileged. Society operates on the premise that everything the whites have is to be taken away, and everything the non-whites don’t have, they get to take from the whites. (or Asians if they are standing in the shoes of the whites).
3. Inclusion: Inclusion means the exclusion of whites, pure and simple. New Hampshire, for example, was declared (by the NEW YORK TIMES IN 2018) to be evil because it is too white. Answer-because it is too white, jobs that should go to anyone based on merit or skill must go to anyone who is non-white.
(“But we are not racist,” says the typical New Hampshire -ite. and “By the way, where are all these non-whites to replace us?” ‘No problem, “says the “I hate Donald” troop, “We are bringing them here from all over the world. (Multiple felony sex offenders, rapists, murderers, and an illegal alien arrested in RYE, NH two days ago). They will take your jobs because you are white and don’t deserve to live, much less work.”
DEI, as you may remember, was all the rage. Why? Because the “Donald is mean” group told you it was good. They also brought you CRT(Critical Race Theory), and they told you that was good too. CRT tells you that America as a country needs to be destroyed because it is based upon white racism of the KKK variety. The Constitution, they say, is simply the white racists imposing their eugenic attitudes on the blacks. Christianity is white racism as well and is used, just like Marx claimed, to drug the masses and pacify the blacks against their slave masters. As a result, all must be destroyed by any means necessary.
So, the question: which is best for me? For my family? For my world?
I say what is best for me Is the America envisioned by the folks who wrote our Constitution.
I say what is best for my family is a President who lives, breathes and fights for that Constitution like he said he would when he took the oath of office.
I say that what is best for my country is that it be free from the CRT/DEi agenda so that we can get back to our fundamental rights, liberties, and values.
I say what is best for my world is a free, strong, and Constitutional America that lives up to its heritage and its values and contributes those values toward making a better world that is at peace-not a world where America is no longer a nation but a zone in the United Nations that is subservient to the ruling world aristocracy and its authoritarian rule.
I prefer my God over Satan, my country over their authoritarian world; my Constitution over their child-grooming pedophile planet. And I choose love- the kind that Jesus taught us to believe in- for all mankind-black, white, brown, yellow, red -man, woman or child -over the hate mongers who love to kill everything I-we- cherish.
The question is then: who that is running for office can get me to the point where I can achieve all that I think best for me and the ones I love?
So, let’s do a little exercise:
Take a little inventory. While in office, Trump issued executive order after executive order banning DEI and CRT. His Dept of Education banished it from what teachers could teach. His administration vigorously attacked every effort that the “I hate Trump “people” undertook to gut America thru these Marxist concepts.
With Biden back in office, he has gutted everything Trump did and has pursued DEI/CRT with almost unlimited resources.
Just on this alone, I know my choice. But something far more important should be considered.
The man they said I should not vote for because he is a mean man and says bad things took one of the most far-reaching steps one could possibly imagine to restart the America that Joe Biden wants to kill; to restart the America I love: he appointed Neil Gorsuch, Amy Coney Barret, and Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
In doing so, he appointed to the bench staunch supporters of our Constitution and our Judicial system. In what I think was a head-on battle in the cultural, political, philosophical, and spiritual war between the New World Order and the America I grew up in, these three justices-without any army, any tanks, any machine guns-with a simple stroke of the pen gutted everything DEI/CRT and struck a blow for 1776 like none has been heard in a great long while. In two companion cases (STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS V HARVARD; STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS V UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA), THE COURT MAJORITY-INCLUDING GORSUCH, BARRET, AND KAVANAUGH, HELD THAT MARXISM IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Specifically, the Court held that race, in any form, cannot be a basis nor even a factor in determining who can be admitted to college. You cannot favor a man because he is black. Nor can you disfavor a woman because she is white. The Constitution requires you to only consider the individuals’ personal achievements, values, attitudes, and qualities. You must judge a person by the quality of their character, not the color of their skin. You should judge an individual for who he or she is and not admit somebody to create equity( i. e. admit them without regard to their Individual abilities but their membership in a racial group).
This decision guts DEI. It guts CRT. It sends a clear message as well to all of society: Marxism ain’t right. It is unconstitutional. It’s illegal.
Simple thought: without Gorsuch, Barrett, and Kavanaugh, Marxism-the new world order- DEI/CRT would have been enshrined as the law of the land. And how do I know that? Simple-if Hilary had won, none of them would have been appointed. Who would have been appointed? Not hard to figure out since we know Biden appointed Ketanji Brown Jackson. (Remember, her-she could not define a woman nor explain the Equal rights provisions of the 14th amendment in her approval hearing).
It seems like my choice is clear. I don’t like DEI. I don’t like CRT. I think both are horrible-partly because they assume that a black man, an Asian man, or any nonwhite man by definition is somehow a lesser person than a white and can only succeed if DEI/CRT protects him. Mostly because they gut our Constitution and the values I believe in re competition and the right of every man, woman, and child to achieve whatever they and their God have decided they could and should achieve.
So for me-I ‘don’t ‘give a shit if he says bad things. If he saves my country-or, better yet, if he helps me and you and all like-minded citizens save our country, he can say anything he friggin well wants to say. And the never-Trumpers be damned with their stupid, idiotic campaign.
Let’s call out the truth:
“He is a mean man” means Vote for Biden.
THE “I HATE TRUMP” REPUBLICANS ARE MORE RESPONSIBLE FOR JOE BIDEN AND ALL THE DAMAGE TO AMERICA HE HAS DONE THAN ANY TEN DEMOCRATS. THEY GOT HIM ELECTED BY BAD-MOUTHING TRUMP. AND left us with Joe Biden’s” I hate America, DEI, and CRT” programs.
The businessman in me says, ” I am not falling for that silliness again. “
I can see the evil that has been done by listening to the mantra of “HE is a bad man.”
Not wanting to be mindlessly manipulated again is enough reason for me to vote for America and my own values. Seeing who the “Bad Man” appointed to the Supreme Court and the rulings they have made is a deal clincher!
The post Breaking News: Very Bad Man Just Destroyed DEI – Funeral To Be Announced appeared first on Granite Grok.
Rye, New Hampshire, is a seacoast town south of Portsmouth, with a population of just over 5500. 97% of its residents graduated high school, and over 62% graduated college. It is also 98% white and increasingly Liberal, and they just caught an illegal alien accused of mass murder.
Antonio Jose De Abreu Vidal Filho, a 29-year-old former Brazilian military police officer, was arrested and taken into custody on Monday in Rye, New Hampshire by immigration officers. Filho escaped to the US in 2019, and has been listed as a fugitive on the Interpol Red Notice, which is an international wanted notice that provides information about a suspect that has been charged or convicted of serious crimes, according to the Boston Herald.
The Left’s embrace of open borders has consequences. Obama’s borderless America lead to kids in cages and the beginning of the ‘Opiod-Epidemic.’ Thousands of people die annually across the country, thanks to the free flow of Chinese fentanyl out of Mexico.
Gangs, crime, human trafficking, and other human costs associated with the policy continue under Joe Biden, with Liberals labeling any effort to control entry as discrimination or xenophobia.
Does it matter that an illegal alien mass murderer on the run from Brazil was arrested in a sleepy coastal New England Town, 3,838 miles away as the crow flies?
Four teenagers under the age of 18, and three teens between the ages of 18 and 19, were among the victims that had been killed. According to El Globo, some of the victims killed had only been accused of minor crimes.
A resident in the city of Fortaleza recalled to the outlet that police officers went on a rampage which included invading homes, dragging people out into the street, and then killing them.
“They dragged him out of the house and shot him and another friend of his who was outside, already lying on the ground,” the resident said.
I doubt it. He didn’t kill anyone in Rye. I would not expect much change at the ballot box or the local party town meetings unless someone wants to point out that Antonio Jose De Abreu Vidal Filho was a “police officer.”
White guilt Rye might decide to take it out on law enforcement, mainly because they are allowed to do that and prohibited from grousing about open borders.
HT | Post Millenial
The post Illegal-Alien Accused of Mass Murder vs. Left-Wing Open-Borders Group-Think appeared first on Granite Grok.
Ah, sure thing. Yep, she said that. A few years ago, to be sure – I doubt that she even remembers. But the Internet never forgets, and neither does GraniteGrok:
Jeanne warned us of these risks on her 2008 Senate campaign site, a quote you won’t find anymore because it has all been scrubbed…
REVERSE GLOBAL WARMING
Reversing global warming is an economic, environmental and health imperative for New Hampshire. If we don’t act to reverse global warming, New Hampshire’s snow season is projected to shrink by almost 50 percent by mid-century, severely impacting our skiing and snowmobile industries. Increasing temperatures also will negatively impact fall foliage tourism, the hunting and fishing industries, and maple sugar production.
If I remember right, last winter wasn’t too shabby, given that the projection was that a two-year-old could do the shoveling of it. But certain, just like her SB711 bill she put in as a state senator that destroyed the medical insurance marketplace here in NH. But years down the line, she’s quite wrong. From the NY Times, she gets a spankin’:
Lastly, California’s last day of snow skiing this year was. . . yesterday, August 6.
The New York Times was not happy about this climate narrative confounding story:
It’s August. Californians Are Still Skiing. Don’t Ask.
Two of the biggest ski resorts on Lake Tahoe were still hopping on the Fourth of July, a time of year when the mountains are usually full of wildflowers. Mammoth Mountain, 140 miles south of the lake, got a positively Alaskan 75 or so feet of snow at its summit and is only now celebrating the final day of the season. . .
In mid-July, well after all the hot dogs and fireworks, I headed up to the Sierra and ran into so much lingering snow that the road through Yosemite National Park hadn’t yet opened for the season. . .
Remember how we were told a decade ago that snowfalls would soon become a thing of the past, and ski resorts were threatened with extinction?
And California has gone from severe drought to bountiful snow in just a year’s time. Things change and change all the time. Especially the weather AND the climate. See, I’m no denier – and millions of years of history have taught us all that lesson. The only deniers are those religious bigots that believe that mankind can change, with our current puny technology, that climate.
Jeanne Shaheen, however, is no religious bigot when it comes to climate change – she’s far less than that. Merely a political opportunist.
The post Jeanne Shaheen: “Snowfall Is A Thing of the Past” appeared first on Granite Grok.
The world was always a strange, weird, demented sort of place, punctuated by moments of sanity and civility, but those respited are becoming fewer and farther between—case in point. A trans-Muslim woman is suing her ex-boyfriend.
It’s actually a man pretending to be a woman and a Muslim who has filed suit in Michigan. Over what?
“Defendant retains possession of my surgically extracted testicles, preserved in [a] Mason jar, kept in [the] fridge next to the eggs. Demand immediate return of my human remains specimen and damages of $6,500,” 40-year-old Brianna Kingsley wrote in an affidavit against 37-year-old William Wojciechowski, according to a report by Reduxx.
Kingsly has a criminal record, not that it would surprise you. Bri is clearly not all there, with some bits being over there, in a mason jar, in the fridge (next to the eggs), to which she he is still attached, in a detached sort of way. It does, however, present opportunities.
You clearly have no balls here; borrow mine.
And as weird as all of that might seem, what’s up with thinking you are a woman and then claiming to be Muslim? Is this white male guilt in its highest form? I not only feel guilty about my race but my sex, so I choose to be a woman in a culture with a significant potential for being dehumanized as both a woman and a man pretending to be one.
As you proceed on this pilgrimage to recover your testicles, be sure to stay away from rooftops. Some of the more devout members of your “faith” have been known to throw people like yourself off of them.
HT | TGP
The post White Dude Who Identifies as a Muslim Woman Seeks Return of ‘Family Jewels’ If You Take my Meaning appeared first on Granite Grok.
URGENT, YOU MUST SEE THIS & SHARE!
The video below is from a Zoom meeting with Keene State BHII, NH DoE employees, and several employees working in NH schools. YOU NEED to listen to this discussion about parental consent and sharing PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE mental health data on students.
DO NOT MISS how some schools are adjusting the consent form at the 20-minute mark!
NOTE: Parental consent was not required when BHII acquired the mental health data on NH students.
Megan Phillips, Lead Evaluator at Keene State BHII, begins the Zoom meeting discussion.
Parents are NOT consenting when their child’s mental health data is shared with BHII.
This VIOLATES the NH Constitutional amendment recently passed protecting our privacy. 2-b. [Right of Privacy.] An individual’s right to live free from governmental intrusion in private or personal information is natural, essential, and inherent. [Art.]
This is UNETHICAL AND violates the school counselor’s code of ethics.
ASCA Ethical Standards
EVERYONE should contact Commissioner Frank Edelblut and ask him WHY this continues to happen year after year.
The NH DoE contracts with Keene State BHII to develop a report for the Feds on how mental health programs are working in the schools. Louis.F.Edelblut@doe.nh.gov
This is MENTAL HEALTH DATA MINING on children in NH schools WITHOUT parental knowledge or consent.
Where does this information GO?
Is this personally identifiable mental health data ever destroyed?
Are they building psychological profiles on students in NH without the knowledge or consent of students or parents?
VIDEO HERE:
It is appalling to watch “mental health” professionals debate and discuss whether consent should be provided when administering or sharing mental health personal information on students. No one mentioned the ethical aspects of releasing Mental Health PII to Keene State or team members within the district.
FEDERAL LAW does require parent consent under these circumstances: Services and assessments REQUIRE CONSENT.
The post URGENT: Mental Health Data on Students Shared w/out Parental Knowledge or Consent: SHOCKING ADMISSIONS! appeared first on Granite Grok.
“The decision to charge an elected constitutional officer is not one that is made lightly,” said Formella into the WMUR mic. I certainly don’t remember our attorney general publicly weighing in on last spring’s arrest of Senator Murphy, another elected official.
We want to thank Julie Smith for this Contribution – Please direct yours to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
You can review our ‘Op-Ed Guidelines‘ on the FAQ Page.
“In this state(NH), there will be equal justice under the law for every person, including public officials,” said Formella into the same WMUR mic.
So the question that the readers should be asking themselves is if Sheriff Brave will receive the same “equal justice” as Senator Murphy. They are certainly not receiving equal WMUR coverage. Is it because… I don’t think I have to say it, but after looking at both their pictures, you decide.
Another question worth asking is that once Sheriff Brave and Senator Murphy’s cases are processed through the system, will Senator Murphy have received the same “equal justice” as Sheriff Brave or the same “equal justice” as the nine executive council arrest victims? Remember that the latter was tormented with 20 months of lawfare until after His Excellency decided against a bid for the Oval Office.
And I leave you with a final thought. All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others—a proclamation by the pigs who control the government in the novel Animal Farm by George Orwell.
The post Some Thoughts on the Recent Arrest of Sheriff Brave appeared first on Granite Grok.
With a few exceptions, there’s no sales tax in New Hampshire, so states like Massachusetts pretend for a weekend to try and recover some of the commerce lost to the Granite State. But Vermont doesn’t have one (Maine either), and here’s why?
According to the Democrats interviewed by the Burlington Free Press, they would have to propose one, and none of them have. Why not?
“If we don’t collect taxes, then we have to cut services. It’s always difficult to give up revenue in the state.” – Sen. Ann Cummings, D-Washington.
“Any lost revenue is a cut in services for Vermonters and needs to be replaced,” – Rep. Emilie Kornheiser, D-Brattleboro.
A dip in sales tax revenue would mean less money in the education fund, Cummings said. To compensate, Vermont would have to raise property taxes.
Kornheiser added research she’s seen suggests purported benefits of sales tax holidays, such as support for local commerce, in reality aren’t particularly helpful.
A sales tax holiday “shifts spending patterns but doesn’t increase purchasing,” she recalled reading.
It does shift spending patterns – from the hands of the Democrat legislature to the people who earned the money. God Help Us!
And no one is suggesting that if they took less from Vermonters that they might invest it in products and services with more value to them than to people hoarding political power.
What interests taxpayers is secondary to the Left’s party agenda. The ridiculous obscene Heat Standard Bill is a great example of that. Vermonters didn’t want their energy to cost more or be less reliable, and neither did the governor. The legislature overrode his veto, and Vermonters got what they voted for. Democrat policy without regard to public input.
And there was public input; they just chose to ignore it.
There was one honest thing in that interview. When asked if anyone would propose a sales tax holiday, the answer was no. No,
“Given the present make-up of the Legislature, probably not,” she said, adding that she wouldn’t support creating a sales tax holiday in Vermont and her committee likely wouldn’t either.
The present make-up of the legislature is veto-proof Democrat majorities which means that if Vermonters want a break from rising taxes, any taxes, they will need to show up and vote for candidates who have at least an inkling of whose money they are spending and why they deserve to keep as much of it as possible.
The post Vermont Doesn’t Have a Sales Tax Holiday Because … appeared first on Granite Grok.
When Nashua residents look around town, one thing should come to mind – fraud – an act of deceiving or misrepresenting. I say this because the Nashua residents have been boldly deceived by Mayor Donchess on the Performing Arts Center.
Nashua residents should not worry about the Performing Arts Center failing because the Nashua taxpayers will be paying rent in order to cover the costs that the Performing Arts Center has incurred on all their loans. This place will be well funded for 25 years with plenty of tax dollars.
I can say this because of the following:
The total price tag for the Performing Arts Center is $39,163,800, of which the City of Nashua taxpayers have guaranteed $37,663,850
But taxpayers must remember we were told that the total construction cost would only be $15.5 maximum; however, as of December 31, 2022, the construction costs have reached $30,276,669.32, and that is not including any so-called “fees.”
Residents should remember that the “project” could not start until the city raised $4 million dollars in private donations. The problem here is that the city could not raise the money. So, the City sponsored a sketchy New Markets Tax Credit financing scheme to cover the $2.4 million dollars short in private donations. Big mistake for Nashua taxpayers, but a win for Mayor Donchess. All this is done behind closed doors with closed meetings and minimal record access.
Most Nashua residents look around for bargains; however, Mayor Donchess did not do his diligence. If Mayor Donchess did his diligence, he would have never gone to the New Market Tax Credit to get the $2.4 million dollars. I say this because the mayor forgot to look at the fees that needed to be paid in order to obtain the NMTC. Total fees have come up to $1.714 million, and that is not including interest.
The most deceiving part of the financing of the Performing Arts Center is the fact that Mayor Donchess gave away the right of the taxpayer to review any information on the construction of the Performing Arts Center. Mayor Donchess handed over $28,108,850 dollars of Nashua taxpayers’ money to a private corporation without disclosing this to the public. In fact, he told the public it would be run as a public business. This action, by far, was the most deceitful act that Mayor Donchess made.
First, Mayor Donchess came up with this “Maximum Guarantee Price” of $15,500,000 for the Performing Arts Center. Truly another big lie by Mayor Donchess, and I can say that because as of December 31, 2022, the construction bills have totaled $28,609,446.50. How can Mayor Donchess say the construction will only cost $15.5 is easy. That figure only represented Harvey Construction costs and none of his sub-contractors – ex Plumbers, Electricians, etc. Talk about deceit.
And on top of all this, Mayor Donchess has “guaranteed” all payments of bills by the City of Nashua taxpayers. But the mayor worked around that too by paying “rent” to the Performing Arts Center to make sure that the taxpayers could cover the costs that the Performing Arts Center had to make on their loans. This rent starts at $500,000 a year and goes up to $670,000 over 25 years. Did anyone see that coming? How could you?
In reviewing all the documents, a resident can see that Mayor Donchess did not take into account the money coming out of the Nashua taxpayers’ pockets. Mayor Donchess chose to hide all this information from citizens, and that is fraud. As a matter of fact, the City of Nashua just actually put the loan of $7.1 million on the books in May 2023, 29 months after the city gave the loan. Deceitful.
One must also remember that in the “first” NMTC meeting in December 2021, led by Mr. Cannon, he stated that the NMTC loan was interest-free the first seven years. In January 2022, Mr. Cummings told the Board of Assessors that the loan was forgiven in 7 years. Talk about deceitful statements because neither of these two things happened and/or will happen.
I hope Nashua taxpayers remember these facts when they are casting their vote in November 2023 for Mayor.
The post The Nashua Performing Arts Center: The Shiny Object That Snookered Taxpayers; Mayor Donchess Smiles appeared first on Granite Grok.
As Maine considers following Massachusetts and Vermont down the California EV, NetZero ***! Hole, the science, and a handful of people with some common sense have stepped in to say, slow the hell down. Electrifying trucks comes with some serious downsides.
The debate is about setting goals for Electric-only Trucks. Not pick-ups, they are already messing with those, and it’s not going well – but box trucks OTR freight lumber, and the rest.
This issue has local complications that go beyond the obvious. Being surrounded by states rushing forward absent common sense, infrastructure, materials, a recycling plan, or the electricity to feed demand are a few. Having to share a grid with those mindless sh!ts, is another. But even at its most basic, there are multiple points of failure when talking about EVs, especially electrifying freight vehicles.
The lack of a higher-voltage charging infrastructure for the amount of electricity needed to run a truck — it could take eight hours or longer to use an automobile charger — is only one challenge.
Limited driving range per charge, which is almost halved when temperatures drop below freezing, is another. With weight limits, trucks would have to carry fewer goods because batteries to run them contribute considerable weight. That could necessitate more trucks on the road to carry the same amount of goods at a time when Maine is trying to reach carbon reduction goals, trucking experts say.
…
“We travel long distances from our terminal and if you are limited on how far the truck can travel and you have to wait eight hours for a charge it’s a problem,” he said.
If we ignore the fact that there’s Net Zero need to reduce carbon emissions, the goal is still not practical.
“…electrified trucks might work for local deliveries and in ports. But they won’t work in northern Maine to move potatoes, broccoli or blueberries all over the East Coast, in the near term, he said. Many trucks use cranes, plows and other attachments that also require power to operate.”
It’s stupid. All of it is stupid and here are a few of those articles I mentioned that expose it for what it is. Stupid.
Not enough stuff, not enough time, no reductions in emissions, and significant harm to indigenous populations. And the left can’t get enough of any of that, it seems, because while it does nothing good and may be worse for the plenty, it’s good for central planning and global tyranny.
The Green Energy agenda strip mines the world’s population to fuel progressive power and influence, so nothing else needs to work.
The post Science Once Again Punches Net Zero In It’s Stupid Face appeared first on Granite Grok.
Most people are familiar with the Constitution’s preamble. A lot of people were required to memorize it in school. But while the preamble is arguably the best-known part of the Constitution, it is the least important.
Like so many other parts of the Constitution, many people today believe that the preamble authorizes all kinds of federal power it never authorized in the first place. For all of its poetic beauty and the sweeping principles it highlights, the Constitution’s preamble doesn’t actually do anything. You could cut the preamble completely out of the Constitution and it wouldn’t change the makeup or operation of the federal government one iota. That’s because a preamble doesn’t grant, delegate or restrict any government power.
In a legal document, a preamble does not carry the force of law. Black’s Law Dictionary describes a preamble this way.
“A clause at the beginning of a constitution or statute explanatory of the reasons for its enactment and the objects sought to be accomplished.”
While they do not confer any power or carry legal force, preambles do serve a purpose. They act as “a key to open the mind of the makers.” In other words, the preamble is not a source of substantive rules, but a statement of assumptions and purposes that sheds light on the main body of the document.
In simplest terms, the preambles serve as a guide on how to read a constitution or a statute. They identify the parties to the legal document, recite crucial facts related to the document and explain its purpose. The Constitution’s preamble serves all three of these purposes.
While the preamble reveals the “why” of the Constitution — “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” — it does not tell us how the new governmental structure will accomplish these goals. And again, I can’t emphasize this enough – while the preamble outlines the broad objectives of the federal government, it does not confer any authority to the government at all.
The structure of the government and the delegation of powers follow in the various articles of the Constitution. For instance, Article 1 Sec. 8 assigns specific enumerated powers to Congress. Article II delegates specific powers to the president. Article III establishes the authority of the judiciary. Without the delegation of powers that follow, the preamble is nothing but a poetic list of objectives with no mechanism to carry them into effect.
Many Americans don’t understand this. They believe the preamble empowers the federal government to take any action conceivable to achieve the Constitution’s stated objectives. As a result, they point to it to justify all kinds of unconstitutional federal actions. They believe that the federal government can do anything and everything to “provide for the common defense,” to “promote the general welfare,” or to “secure the blessings of liberty.”
Conniving politicians take advantage of this ignorance.
In fact, politicians began abusing the words of the preamble to justify federal actions almost before the ink was dry on the Constitution. Defenders of the Alien and Sedition Acts appealed to the preamble, claiming it supported federal laws that criminalized criticism of the government, ignored due process, and assumed power over immigration that was not delegated. James Madison dispensed with their arguments in the Report of 1800.
“They will waste but little time on the attempt to cover the act by the preamble to the constitution; it being contrary to every acknowledged rule of construction, to set up this part of an instrument, in opposition to the plain meaning, expressed in the body of the instrument. A preamble usually contains the general motives or reasons, for the particular regulations or measures which follow it; and is always understood to be explained and limited by them. In the present instance, a contrary interpretation would have the inadmissible effect, of rendering nugatory or improper, every part of the constitution which succeeds the preamble.” [Emphasis added]
The preamble is like the introduction to a book. It gives you a general idea as to what the book is about. But you would never write a book report just by reading the introduction – that is, if you care about getting a decent grade.
Anybody trying to justify this or that federal action through the words of the preamble almost certainly hopes to expand government power beyond its constitutional bounds. The preamble tells us a little, but it doesn’t reveal a lot. People need to keep those well-known words in their proper context.
Mike Maharrey | The Tenth Amendment Center
The post Is This the Least Important Part of the Constitution? appeared first on Granite Grok.
Unite behind the nominee!!! Vote Republican up and down the ballot!!! I am mystified and mortified that people still actually believe this pablum. If you really believe that things are going to change under a President Christie, Haley, Pence, Scott … YOU ARE DELUSIONAL. Same goes for replacing Schumer with McConnell or one of the other McConnell-bots. What has the GOP House actually done? Talk and talk and talk and talk … but NEVER any action.
It’s not about Republican versus Democrat. We should have learned that after 2016 when we saw Republican “leaders” Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, and their minions and wannabes, work hand-in-hand with Democrats to block Trump. It’s the Rich Men North of Richmond … some with the “D” after their name; some with the “R” after their name … versus everyone else.
‘Rich Men North Of Richmond’ has crossed all racial, political and economic lines.
It pulls at the universal pain in our hearts as we watch the world get worse around us because of corrupt predator elites.
These crossovers are
pic.twitter.com/vOZZaLKPTE
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) August 17, 2023
Rich Men North of Richmond going viral was nothing more than friends texting each other. Friends with massive distribution. A lot of people are victims of gas lighting and think the right is “marginal.” We are the majority of but suppression was unrelenting until now.
— Cernovich (@Cernovich) August 18, 2023
The feeling in the country right now isn't right or left.
It's not Democrat or Republican.
It's not white or black.
The rich men north of Richmond are terrified of the day when we figure that out.pic.twitter.com/Z12q4P0YB4
— Jason Howerton (@jason_howerton) August 17, 2023
These Americans, from all walks of life, reacting to Rich Men North of Richmond, is unspeakably powerful.
pic.twitter.com/w2ErgAfjzQ
— The Redheaded libertarian (@TRHLofficial) August 17, 2023
No words… Thank you. pic.twitter.com/UUFVfJQdab
— Oliver Anthony (@AintGottaDollar) August 13, 2023
The post It’s NOT Republican vs. Democrat … It’s The Rich Men North of Richmond Versus Us appeared first on Granite Grok.
Having reviewed his Sherlock Holmes cases using Inspector Clouseau’s investigative practices, Columbo, having been hired by Jill Biden, has finally solved the crime of unlawful possession of the white substance in The White House.
We want to thank Charles Bradley III for this Op-Ed. Please submit yours to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
Jill informed Columbo that the FBI and the CIA were clueless concerning the identity of the perpetrator. Columbo, understanding the importance of circumstantial evidence, knew that thousands of tourists entered our White House every day. Columbo reasoned either that explained why white powder was reportedly found in four different locations or indicated a degree of incompetence by the FBI and Secret Service, which Columbo believed incredible.
Columbo also knew from a Secret Service confidential source that the Biden’s son, Hunter, was a cocaine addict, videotaped himself romping with the fairer sex while on cocaine, left firearms in a public place, and forgot the incriminating Hunter Biden videotape at a computer repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware. Columbo also had inside information that the FBI has the technology to extract fingerprints from plastic but had inexplicitly lost the plastic bag.
Despite this overwhelming circumstantial evidence, which has convicted and imprisoned many for serious felonies, Columbo could not bring himself to believe or conclude that the DOJ, FBI, or Secret Service had become so corrupt as to allow a President and his son to defile the White House. Therefore, Columbo decided to advise Jill the white powder must have been from tourists eating white powdered-coated donuts from the Donut Shop in Lafayette Square.
Unfortunately, even with direct evidence, our top Federal criminal investigation services look the other way when it comes to protecting the Obama/Biden catastrophe. I guess if they can fool Columbo, they think they can fool all of us!
The post The Crime of Unlawful Possession appeared first on Granite Grok.
An heir to the Anheuser Busch Beer dynasty is unhappy with the direction global brand pirate InBev has taken his family’s legacy. Billy Busch is prepared to make an offer to buy it back if InBev will part with it.
“When InBev bought the company it was a ship and it was rolling down the ocean at full speed doing great and all of a sudden they come out with this kind of woke culture, a political agenda to push down people’s throats, and the beer drinker obviously doesn’t relate to that kind of advertising so they boycotted it,” Busch told Lahren. … “If they don’t want that brand any longer, sell it back to the Busch family. Sell it to me. I’ll be the first in line to buy that brand back to me and we’ll make that brand great again.”
He promised no more woke garbage and a commitment to the consumers and America.
That sounds nice, but I doubt InBev is interested in selling. Despite the downfall of the Queen of Beers (Bud Light), the overall AB brand is making money for InBev globally. BUD showed a respectable profit over the last quarter, and even though AB is shedding some brands, and Bud Light may never recover the customers it lost, that business is not in danger. You don’t typically sell something that is making you good money, and most of the bad PR has blown over.
The damage is done, and people have chosen to stick with or abandon the brand. Further attrition seems unlikely, and as long as Mulvaney leaves it alone, it is probably watery beer under the bridge.
Billy Busch can probably take a seat, but stranger things have happened. If InBev finds itself with another BUD problem, it might do something other than shed bad decision-makers, but I can’t see that outcome from here. And it might just be elitist enough to think – like politicians – that what it needs is different customers.
But isn’t that what Bud Light was trying to do with Mulvaney; and look how that turned out.
HT | NewsWars
The post Billy Busch Offers to Buy BUD Back appeared first on Granite Grok.
Someone, please tell me it isn’t so! Reports say that Joe Biden wants to send 3,000 reservists over to Eastern Europe. Now, I’m not too opposed to sending some money and relief supplies over, even some weapons, to help Ukraine defend itself from Putin’s invasion – but our troops?
I think that’s a bad idea, but Joe has done lots of questionable things in the past couple of years.
And why reserve troops? Can it be the military just can’t fill its recruitment goals? Being big on Transgenderism and Wokeness, how come these folks aren’t rushing to their local recruiters after all the support Joe has given them? Lack of gratitude runs strong among the free stuff crowd I suspect. Oh sure, they will rush to vote themselves more freebees but anything else stretches their limits.
Guess we (the US) are running short on weapons and ammo, and no wonder – we’ve already sent aid to them to the tune of $80 million. Oh wait! I think that’s Billions in equipment that was left behind in Afghanistan, too! Replacement costs for both will be triple that but the Left wants its (our) money spent on anything other than national security or public safety. The Green New Deal was thankfully killed because it had more pork than green in it yet in their never-ending quest to spend taxpayer money on anything, including illegal immigrants (breaking federal laws and violating our Constitution), still hasn’t dampened their enthusiasm in spending one bit.
Speaking of breaking laws, Ole Joe is a past master of that but to hear him and his crowd tell it, there is no evidence of that. Sure, his own recorded admission of demanding that a former Ukraine President drop an investigation against a company Hunter worked for, investigations into the Hunter laptop scandal, or whistle-blowers testimony’s indicating Joe (the big guy) was fully involved in Hunter’s corruption, is damning. Add to that, payoffs from China is very strong evidence of being factual and provable – how is this not evidence?
That’s why the entire Leftist establishment is doing everything possible to railroad President Trump – and it’s all phony. Trump is the biggest threat that The Swamp has ever faced so they are pulling out all the stops. It will be up to every Patriot to become a supporter and an activist in the coming elections if we are to have any hope of turning back the Marxist tide.
The post Bumbling Joe Is At It Again appeared first on Granite Grok.
I ask the reader, have you ever wondered why that over the past half-century, the purpose of so many of our institutions so vital to liberty has been gradually turned upside down? Today I read the true purpose of law enforcement on a plaque at the Merrimack Police Station: “protection of Life and property.”
This is but one example of the specific trend of law enforcement changing from its proper purpose. However, It is not the fault of our police forces but the politics behind them that was so evident in the summer of 2020.
Unfortunately, the gradual change from the protection of life and property has accelerated into high gear over the past two decades, and that graduated to anarchy in hundreds of cities. In those areas where politics trumped the Law, I’m reminded of Frédéric Bastiat”s prophetic words from in his 1848 book: “The Law,” which I call the antithesis to the Communist Manifesto:
The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law becomes the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself is guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!
Author of 7 books and speaker throughout the nation, James Perloff in his PowerPoint presentation, will reveal the power and dark money that has ruled over and above “law” to force their agenda with the true purpose, the “ultimate change,” American freedom into slavery. Come and see Perloff’s presentation:
“AN OLIGARCHY CONTROLS AMERICA —— FACT OR CONSPIRACY THEORY.”
He is an excellent speaker and will provide you with the facts. You be the judge.
RSVP
Register Here: https://form.jotform.com/231995860543062
The post The Law Perverted appeared first on Granite Grok.
Since the election of Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020, the left and a few Republicans have lost their collective mind. They have gone into a stage of sheer lunacy and have not returned.
The sham impeachment against Attorney General Ken Paxton, led by fellow Republicans, is a testament to the misguided actions of some within our party. We must rally behind Paxton, highlighting his exemplary record. As the impeachment proceedings against Attorney General Ken Paxton loom, a glaring truth emerges: this is another politically motivated fraud reminiscent of the baseless impeachment attempts against former President Trump.
It is no coincidence that Paxton, hailed as one of the most conservative Attorney Generals Texas has ever seen, finds himself in the crosshairs of fellow Republicans who are determined to silence his unwavering support for President Trump.
Undoubtedly, the political terrain of our esteemed state has been experiencing a notable metamorphosis in recent years. This transformation is propelled by the dynamic currents of conservatism and the unrelenting endeavors of those who remain steadfast in their commitment to preserving the core principles that define our party. It is with a sense of duty and concern that I address you today as we stand on the precipice of a critical decision regarding the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton.
The political climate in the aftermath of the 2016 and 2020 elections has been nothing short of tumultuous. The deep divisions that have emerged within our nation have also permeated the very fabric of our party. While unity and shared values have been our strength, they are now being tested by what can only be described as a misguided and politically motivated impeachment effort against one of our most moral leaders.
Attorney General Ken Paxton has been a stalwart defender of conservative principles throughout his tenure. His commitment to the Constitution, his unwavering defense of individual rights, and his tireless efforts to uphold the rule of law have garnered the respect and admiration of many Texans. Because of these qualities, he is attacked from some quarters within our party.
The impeachment proceedings against Paxton are reminiscent of the unjust and baseless attempts to impeach former President Donald Trump. Forces seek to undermine and silence those who have boldly supported President Trump’s vision for our nation. Ken Paxton’s vocal and unapologetic advocacy for our former President has made him a target for those who wish to stifle conservative voices and maintain a stranglehold on the Republican Party.
As representatives of the people, we must remember our duty to uphold the principles that our party was founded upon. We must stand united against any attempts to undermine the integrity of our elected officials through politically motivated actions. The impeachment of Ken Paxton would set a dangerous precedent, signaling that internal party politics can be weaponized against those with differing views. This is not the path we should be treading.
The state of Texas has always been a beacon of conservatism, a stronghold for principles that reflect the heart and soul of our great nation. The rising tide of conservatism in Texas has resulted from dedicated individuals, conservative activists, and organizations working tirelessly to advance our shared values. Ken Paxton has been a champion of these values, and we must protect and support him, just as he has watched and supported the rights and freedoms of Texans.
Impeaching Ken Paxton would not only be a disservice to him as an individual but also undermine the will of the people who elected him to serve as Attorney General. The consequences of such an action would extend far beyond his tenure, sending a message that party politics and personal agendas take precedence over the principles and ideals we hold dear.
Therefore, dear Senators, I urge you to consider the long-term ramifications of your decision. Upholding the values of conservatism, unity, and fairness means standing by those who have remained true to these principles. Let us not allow our party to be divided by internal strife, but rather let us come together to support Attorney General Ken Paxton and reject the politically motivated impeachment efforts against him. By doing so, we can ensure that Texas remains a beacon of conservative principles and a shining example for our nation.
With great appreciation, very best wishes, and respect.
The post Dear Respected Texas Senators appeared first on Granite Grok.
That tearing sound you heard on Monday was Fani Willis doing her best impersonation of Nancy Pelosi after a State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, what Mrs. Willis was shredding was not a speech by Donald Trump, but due process in this country and the United States Constitution.
It has become undeniable that in the Democrat’s desperation to remove former President Trump from the 2024 presidential election, the left has resorted to an unprecedented tactic of lawfare. Can’t beat him at the ballot box? Just make sure you get enough lawsuits and indictments in as many activist courts as possible.
In the early afternoon of August 14, the Fulton County Court posted on its website an indictment against President Trump and eighteen other defendants even assigning it a case number and a court. The problem was that the grand jury had not even convened to finish listening to witnesses or even begin deliberations. Made aware of their unmasking, they quickly took down the posting. However, no amount of fact checkers are going to be able to explain this one away.
But this is just the left’s latest attempt. Beginning in Sept. 2022, New York Attorney General Letitia James filed a $250 million suit against the Trump family and top Trump Organization executives two months before President Trump even announced he was running again in 2024. AG James claims that the defendants artificially inflated real estate values to induce bank loans. Never mind the facts. Not one bank claims it was not paid in full in a timely manner or that banks routinely order independent appraisals on real estate by law when property is used for a loan.
To spur along the effort, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland sent top Biden Justice official Matthew Colangelo to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office. Magically, the first ever criminal indictment of a former president appeared in April. The crime here? The felony of a businessman settling a nuisance claim. In this case as well, no victims have been proffered in the charges.
Apparently, this was not enough as the New York Times reported that President Biden complained that AG Garland needed to “stop acting like a ponderous judge and to take decisive action” on President Trump, and that Biden believed Trump was a “threat to democracy.” Well Garland must have got the message loud and clear as, if on cue, Jack Smith was named special counsel.
If Jack Smith’s name sounds familiar, it is because he has a history of ruthlessly prosecuting Republicans, including a conviction of the former Republican Governor of Virginia, Bob McDonnell. However, that conviction was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court, which also rebuked Smith noting “the uncontrolled power of criminal prosecutors is a threat to our separation of powers.” Seems like the perfect man for Biden’s job.
Jack Smith has now infamously brought indictments for President Trump in Florida because apparently Smith has never read the Presidential Records Act. However, Smith was obviously not pleased with the court assigned to this case and so he then filed charges in Washington, D.C. for the heinous crime of not agreeing with the official narrative that the 2020 election was free and fair. He also made sure that this time he got exactly the judge he wanted in political activist Tanya Chutkan. If anyone questioned the show trial nature of these proceedings, one only had to look at the previously unheard of other federal judges sitting in the audience to witness President Trump’s arraignment, including D.C. District Chief Judge James Boasberg and Judge Amy Berman Jackson.
Which leads to Willis’ most recent actions because obviously four trials at once were not enough. And in what can undeniably be the Biden version of “show me the man and I’ll show you the crime,” conveniently Willis already had the indictment prepared for the grand jury.
The left can not seem to stop overplaying their hand. Another apparent truth is that the Constitution has been eviscerated by this regime and the country has descended to a banana republic. At least we are not at the level of the original true banana republic, Ecuador, where they just assassinate the leading opposition candidate.
The left claims to be concerned with voter suppression, but true to form they offer confession through projection. They are trying to remove the clear Republican presumptive candidate against the apparent will of the people. However, there is hope. As a nation, we have one opportunity to set things right and restore the country back to We the People on November 5, 2024. We need to all turn out and vote as if our lives depend on it — they actually might.
John C. O’Shea is an America First businessman from Fort Worth, Texas running for Texas’ 12th Congressional District.
John O’Shea |The Daily Caller News Service
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
The post Prosecuting Donald Trump Is The Left’s Version Of Election Interference appeared first on Granite Grok.
Joe Biden has figured it all out in the fifty years he has sucked off the dole in Washington, D.C. He knows there is more money to be made, more corrupt money, that is, outside America’s borders. He knows if he keeps sending our money to places like Ukraine, the kickbacks will keep coming back to Joe. Joe Biden does not care about Americans or America. America is a tool for Biden to use to fatten his family’s financial coffers. Joe Biden made a number of erroneous claims in a speech he gave this week in Milwaukee, but one of his lies summed up Joe Biden’s purpose for being President.
He pulled out a story he has used dozens of times about a supposed call he received from his wife, Jill. She called to confirm a story run in the daily paper claiming that Joe Biden was the poorest member of Congress. He, of course, had to admit it but does not go on to explain how this poor Senator went on to become a multi-millionaire on his Government salary. Biden doesn’t go on to explain his two mega homes in Delaware that he managed to buy on a $174,000 salary and his wife as a public school teacher. Because if Joe did have to explain his current wealth, he would have to divulge the illegal means he employed to acquire his incredible wealth. Joe Biden is an American success story on how to build wealth illegally and not pay your fair share while squeezing every cent he can for every American. Joe Biden is a con.
But the story today is not about Biden’s wealth. It is about his misguided principles to make countries like Ukraine richer by giving them our money and then costing Americans more money every day to fund his agenda.
During his two-plus years in office, Biden has already committed over $113 Billion to Ukraine. We know that Ukraine is one of the countries funneling monies back to the Biden bank accounts. This fact explains why Biden is directing Congress to send another $24 Billion to his friend, Volodymyr Zelenskyy. At the same time, Biden wants to give each family impacted by the fires in Maui a check for $700. Our citizens in Hawaii who have lost everything are to receive a one-time payment equal to 10% of the average monthly cost of living in our 50th state. These folks in Hawaii will not share any of that $700 with Joe like his buddy, Zelenskyy, will. Biden knows where his toast is buttered.
This scenario shows how out of touch Joe Biden is with America. Bidenomics is costing Americans $700 a month more than two years ago. Let’s say an average family earns $50,000 a year. With inflation costing that family $8,400 a year, they are actually making $41,600 or nearly 17% less than when Donald Trump was our President. That is the real story of Bidenomics. Every American family suffers while the Biden family gets richer. That is the Biden Dream and the American Nightmare, and I don’t have to whisper to make my point.
The post Joe Biden’s Ukraine First Agenda appeared first on Granite Grok.
