The Manchester Free Press

Monday • May 29 • 2023

Vol.XV • No.XXII

Manchester, N.H.

Is it time for Commissioner Shibinette to answer some questions?

The Liberty Block - Fri, 2021-10-08 21:44 +0000

By Andrew J. Manuse 

As a political appointee, N.H. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Director Lori Shibinette has been leading the state’s COVID-19 response by attempting to make herself appear credible while deflecting all criticism, and it’s time to start asking questions.

We’ve all heard about the number of cases, the number of deaths, the threat of overburdened hospitals, and even statistics separating male and female outcomes, but this type of information only gives the appearance of value. Good public health policy doesn’t only consider these metrics while neglecting others. The information’s only purpose, it seems, is to create the appearance of authority and thoughtfulness while manipulating the public into hysteria. The Department is ignoring data from peer-reviewed studies that counter their prevailing narrative, while seemingly ignorant that they are not presenting a full data set. 

On Sept. 17, in a meeting with the legislative Fiscal Committee, Commissioner Shibinette said, “What we do know when we look at our hospitalizations: that 90- plus percent of people that are hospitalized with serious illness are unvaccinated. That’s a fact.” How can Commissioner Shibinette present this undocumented data as fact when the Department has not required the complete and thorough collection of data? 

In contrast to data available in Britain and Israel, which is highly regarded and granular, New Hampshire politicians have not done due diligence to ensure their data is complete. Here are some questions the Department needs to answer to reveal the state’s blind spots to the public: 

  • Which written directives have DHHS issued that require all patients—both in-patient and out-patient—to be COVID tested and asked about their vaccination status? 
  • Which written directives have DHHS issued advising that vaccinated and unvaccinated members of the public be COVID tested in the same manner? 
  • Which written directives have DHHS issued requiring hospitals to report the vaccination status and infection status of all patients? 
  • Has DHHS mandated that all patients regardless of vaccination status be tested at the same cycle thresholds for COVID-19? 

Similarly, the Department hasn’t insisted on policies that will give a full picture of the risks of the COVID-19 vaccination. Here are some more questions: 

  • What guidance has DHHS issued to ensure that doctors and other healthcare workers can properly identify COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions? 
  • What directives has DHHS issued requiring hospitals to report COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions to the federal VAERS database? 

The unfortunate reality is we do not have the statewide data to support the Department’s myopic vaccination push, either. Meanwhile, DHHS continues to ignore the totality of public health. The vast majority of COVID-19 deaths are among those with chronic health conditions, those who are obese, and those who are Vitamin D deficient. Here are some more questions: 

  • What guidance has the Department provided to the public about good health measures such as diet, exercise, and vitamin supplementation, to avoid serious complications from COVID-19? 
  • What percentage of COVID-19 outreach spending does the Department use to inform citizens about the importance of proactive vitamin intake—Vitamins C and D in particular—and maintaining a healthy Body Mass Index (BMI)?

In addition, recent research makes it clear that early treatment of COVID-19 saves lives. What guidance has the Department released that encourages medical professionals to treat COVID-19 early and consider off-label treatments, including with ivermectin? 

While the Department is failing to pull together meaningful data and provide good public health recommendations, the Commissioner is doing a great job trampling the rights of New Hampshire citizens by violating a new Constitutional provision that protects privacy and fanning the flames of discrimination against people who choose not to vaccinate. Here are some related questions: 

  • Are recipients of the COVID-19 vaccine tracked by the N.H. Immunization Information System or can they opt-out as required by law? 
  • What does opt-out mean to the Department? Does opt-out mean that an individual is truly removed from the database or does it mean the person’s record is updated with an opt-out tag?
  • Which written directives have DHHS issued to ensure that all COVID-19 vaccine administrators are offering citizens of New Hampshire the opportunity to opt-out of the vaccine registry? 
  • Considering vaccinated individuals can still contract and spread COVID-19, why is the Department discriminating against unvaccinated individuals, even recommending their segregation? 
  • Why is guidance from the Department to public schools recommending quarantine procedures only for the unvaccinated? 

The gaps in state data make me wonder whether the Department is simply serving as a conduit for top-down directives from our Centers for Disease Control overlords. If this is true, we’re seeing yet another area where the federal government is flexing its muscle and trying to erase New Hampshire state sovereignty. New Hampshire deserves better than a puppet state bureaucracy. 

Andrew J. Manuse is chairman of RebuildNH, which is also known as ReopenNH, a grassroots group devoted to restoring the rule of law and rebuilding the economy. 

The post Is it time for Commissioner Shibinette to answer some questions? appeared first on The Liberty Block.

From Mask Mandates to Cattle Cars

The Liberty Block - Fri, 2021-10-08 17:16 +0000

During the reign of Nazi Germany, the Jewish people were said to be dirty, evil, and dangerous to the general population. This was used as justification when they were eventually herded into cattle cars by the government and brought to isolation/concentration/quarantine camps. 

It’s often claimed that “we won WWII”, but did we really? Does anyone ever truly “win” a war? 

How many of you knew that the United States government allowed much of the Nazi command structure to enter our union and start working for our central government? Do you think they did anything to undermine the values of our country?

Did you know that our NASA program and the CIA were full of “Operation Paperclip” Nazis? 

What kind of remnants did they leave behind?

“From nerve and disease agents to the feared and coveted V-1 and V-2 rockets, Nazi scientists worked on an impressive arsenal. As the war came to a close in 1945, both American and Russian officials began scheming to get that technology for themselves. So it came to pass that 71 years ago today, 88 Nazi scientists arrived in the united states and were promptly put to work for Uncle Sam.” 

Why is this relevant? Because now it is the “unvaccinated”, not the jewish people, that are the “dirty” and “dangerous” ones now being threatened with the loss of employment, dishonorable discharge, and, most importantly, “isolation and quarantine” in “COVID camps”. Don’t believe me? Just look here and apply for your next job: 

Army National Guard Recruits For ‘Internment’ And ‘Resettlement’ Specialist, Military Documents Lay Out Procedure For ‘Civilian Internees’

Excerpt:

“Internment/resettlement specialists are primarily responsible for day-to-day operations in a military confinement/correctional facility or detention/internment facility,” according to an Army National Guard job posting that touts “A monthly paycheck” as a benefit to being an internment and resettlement specialist.

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Number 2310.01E issued on August 19, 2014 states: “Subject to the requirements of the law of war and this directive, POWs and unprivileged belligerents may lawfully be detained until a competent authority determines that the conflict has ended or that active hostilities have ceased, and civilian internees may lawfully be detained until the reasons that necessitated the civilian’s internment no longer exist.”

The DoD directive states that: 

“Biometric identification information (BII) will be collected from all detainees in accordance with DoDD 8521.01E (Reference (i)) as soon as practicable after their capture by, or transfer to, the custody or control of DoD personnel, and will be included in detainee records. BII collected on detainees who are U.S. citizens or U.S. resident aliens will be conducted in accordance with U.S. law and policy and all applicable DoD regulations…Civilian internees interned for imperative reasons of security or for their protection will be transferred or released when the reasons that necessitated internment no longer exist and a safe and orderly transfer or release is practicable. A civilian internee convicted of a criminal offense will be released from punitive confinement when the court administered sentence to confinement ends.”

In the DoD directive, “civilian internee” is defined as “Any civilian, including any person described by Article 4 of Reference (e), who is in the custody or control of DoD during an armed conflict or case of occupation, such as those held for imperative reasons of security or protection.”

Civilian Internee (US DoD Definition)

Internment/Resettlement Specialist (31E)

New INTERNMENT/RESETTLEMENT SPECIALIST

Dictator Sununu claims that this federal contract doesn’t need to be adhered to because it’s just “generic boiler plate language seen in many other contracts” and “unenforceable”. If we believe this drivel, he’s quite simply insinuating that he plans to take the money and run, ultimately violating said contract. He asserts that NH will retain is sovereignty, even though the contract explicitly states otherwise: 

“Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Funds: A recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with funds made available under the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-123): the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, 2020 (the “CARES

Act”) (P.L. 116-136); the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act (P.L.

116-139); and/or the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Division M – Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260), the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2) agrees, as applicable to the award, to: 

1) comply with existing and/or future directives and guidance from the Secretary [a federal politician] regarding control of the spread of COVID-19; 

2) in consultation and coordination with [federal] HHS, provide, commensurate with the condition of the individual, COVID-19 patient care regardless of the individual’s home jurisdiction and/or appropriate public health measures (e.g., social distancing, home isolation); and

3) assist the United States Government in the implementation and enforcement of federal orders related to quarantine and isolation.

In addition, to the extent applicable, Recipient will be required to comply with Section 18115 of the CARES Act, with respect to the reporting to the HHS Secretary of results of tests intended to detect SARS-CoV-2 or to diagnose a possible case of COVID-19. Such reporting shall be in accordance with guidance and direction from HHS and/or CDC. 

… but that’s not all. Extracted from “Additional Terms and Conditions of Award”: 

“(CDC) hereby incorporates Immunization and Vaccines for Children, which are hereby made a part of this Non-research award.” 

[in addition] “…the recipient is expected to provide to CDC copies of and/or access to COVID-19 data collected with these funds, included but not limited to data related to COVID-19 testing CDC will specify in further guidance and directives what is encompassed in this requirement.” 

If this federal bribe money (“award”) is accepted by our elected officials, [We the PEOPLE of NH] will have agreed to comply with any and all unknown “future directives and guidance,” in addition to the currently explicit “enforcement of federal orders related to quarantine and isolation.” 

But, don’t worry, it’s just “boiler-plate language” according to Sununu. Do we seriously believe anything that this dictator is spewing in between his cookies? Do you trust Sununu’s words? Do you trust that the federal government won’t continue to grow more tyrannical? Do you trust the mainstream media to be impartial and unbiased?

Sununu has yet to articulate one single cognizable fact that would support his incessant blathering. He has also said that the State “might” have a legal memorandum from the AG regarding the legality and constitutional implications of the State’s acceptance of this bribe money.” 

Don’t you think we should have had this prior to the Executive Council meeting that we shut down? 

Rather than provide any sort of meaningful response to our questions and concerns, this man tries to demonize and slander anyone that demands a coherent response or, at least, a logically consistent answer from him. Nothing he’s said about the EC meeting is making sense. At one point during his WMUR press conference, he said that the government can’t tell a business how to define the constitution! If this is true, then what about the ADA which prohibits discrimination against minorities? Is Sununu saying that businesses are free to discriminate and violate the ADA and NH RSA 354-A:16? It certainly appears this way. In fact, this is the sole purpose of the government! If it’s not the government’s job to uphold and enforce the Constitution… whose is it? 

We the PEOPLE must take a stand and rise up against such tyranny. Believe what you will. Say what you may. We the PEOPLE are the NH Constitution. It’s up to us to make sure that it is adhered to.

Are we going to allow the segregation, detention, and quarantine & isolation of certain segments of the population here in NH? Are we going to allow another genocide, or are we going to learn from the past lessons of history? 

Is this the future that you want to see for your children?

“Papers, sir.”

“Papers, ma’am.”

“Your booster isn’t up to date.” 

“Your microchip license needs to be updated and renewed.”

“You’re under arrest for thinking outside the box.”

“I’m just following orders, I got mouths to feed.”

There’s no right or left anymore. Partisan politics serve nothing but to divide us. All that remains is the Freedom side, and the Tyranny side. It’s time to pick a side. You decide. The line in the sand has been drawn. Absolute defiance, mass non-compliance, is the path to freedom. Playing nice, political correctness, is exactly what got us here in this position. The time for niceties and kind words is over. “We know where you live” is a factual statement of public record, not a threat. If this makes you uncomfortable, it should. The real question is: “are you more comfortable with the government knowing where you live (vax-registry) and where you are at all times (location data/contact tracing)?”

The post From Mask Mandates to Cattle Cars appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Dictator Sununu & Millions In Disturbing Contracts

The Liberty Block - Fri, 2021-10-08 12:59 +0000

By Kelley Potenza for The Liberty Block

It appears that Dictator Sununu is looking to spend over $10 million dollars of your money to negate your freedoms!

Over the last few days, you may have heard a lot about the $27 million dollars federal DHHS COVID grant, and then the all-out intimidation, threats, and assault on NH House Rep. Ken Weyler. Did Sununu create a smokescreen for another all-out attack on our freedoms?

We believe there are 10+ million reasons why Sununu is implementing a Salesforce takeover running through the Department of Administrative Services. We are now witnessing the destruction of the Live Free or Die state.

On October 13, 2021, Governor Christopher T. Sununu during the Executive Council meeting is going to force-feed over 10 MILLION of our money to 10 different companies to implement Salesforce throughout the state. Each of these contracts includes an option to EXTEND the contracts 2 times. Does this mean $30 million in taxpayer-funded dollars could be given to private companies by Sununu over four years, largely for the enforcement of corona-fascism? These questions need to be asked and answered!

After the preliminary research of these 10 Salesforce developers, it looks as if they could be used to implement a CRM statewide system to track, trace, and digitalize every inhabitant of NH. A senior-level employee of Salesforce said the majority of their current development (sales) is focused around implementing COVID-type solutions for customers.

Is Dictator Sununu looking to implement these “COVID-type solutions” in your everyday life? Things like… I’m sorry but we can’t treat your illness because you aren’t vaccinated? Please show your vaccine passport for admission to the concert? Please show your digital ID to renew your car registration? We only accept digital currency here? Please show me your barcode? Every day in NH we are facing an unprecedented trampling of our right to live freely from government intrusion and medical tyranny in our lives – which was supposedly prevented by our recent constitutional amendment.

The list below is taken directly from the ‘Governor and Executive Consent Council Agenda from September 29, 2021’ (the meeting was canceled) so this will be pushed to the October 13, 2021 meeting. 

NH-SOS – September 29, 2021

#94      Authorize to enter into a contract with Brite Systems Inc., Indianapolis, IN, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#95      Authorize to enter into a contract with Tech Mahindra Americas Inc., Plano, TX, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#96      Authorize to enter into a contract with Deloitte Consulting LLP, Concord, NH, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#97      Authorize to enter into a contract with Coresphere LLC, Bethesda, MD, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#98      Authorize to enter into a contract with MTX Group Inc., Albany, NY, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#99      Authorize to enter into a contract with Slalom LLC, Boston, MA, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#100    Authorize to enter into a contract with 22nd Century Technologies Inc., McLean, VA, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#101    Authorize to enter into a contract with Spruce Technology Inc., Clifton, NJ, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#102    Authorize to enter into a contract with Catalyst Consulting Group Inc., Chicago, IL, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

#103    Authorize to enter into a contract with Sapient Corporation d/b/a Publicis Sapient of Boston, MA, for an aggregate price limitation of $10,000,000 among all awarded vendors, for Salesforce Professional Services.  Effective upon G&C approval through December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for 2 additional one-year extension terms. 

*#104    Authorize to amend an existing contract with Computer Aid Inc., Allentown, PA (originally approved by G&C on 4-17-19, item #148), for IT Professional Vendor Managed Services, by increasing the price by $1,500,000 from $7,000,000 to $8,500,000 and by extending the completion date from December 31, 2021 to March 31, 2022. 

*This increase “continues to support various project initiatives in response to the COVID pandemic…” What specifically are these approved projects? And, why the need for more money and additional time?

Here is just a snapshot of MTX Salesforce solutions:

https://www.mtxb2b.com/s/erm-product

https://www.mtxb2b.com/s/safe-at-work

https://www.mtxb2b.com/s/safevax-solutions

We already know that 150 government agencies & systems are using Salesforce for corona-fascism and vaccine databases.

We can NOT allow Dictator Sununu to sell us out any longer.

*THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN UPDATED* After further investigation, we have been informed that the amount would be an aggregate of all approved contracts not exceeding $10,000,000 (originally, it was believed to be 10 individual contracts for $10,000,000 which would have equaled $100,000,000.)

The post Dictator Sununu & Millions In Disturbing Contracts appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Let’s Go, Brandon! (#FJB)

The Liberty Block - Thu, 2021-10-07 05:12 +0000

Over the past few months, chants of “F*ck Joe Biden” have been springing up all over the united states, including many sporting events, and even in the leftist epicenter of NYC. 

Despite most politicians and nearly every president being despised by the general public (only around 25% of the population voted for Trump and Clinton in 2016), this phenomenon is entirely unprecedented. Never before have people at football games felt such a deep hatred and anger for a president that they felt motivated to chant about cursing him. 

Some musicians have said “F*ck Donald Trump” during shows, but none to our knowledge have ever said the same during a concert about a Democrat president. Recently, Aaron Lewis fans at a concert joined the nationwide chant, and fans at a recent Brantley Gilbert concert did the same.

Of course, the progressives have been panicking about the popularity of the anti-Biden chants. Hashtags like ‘#FJB’ trending on Twitter were bad enough, but when people out in the real world are cursing out the man who you claim is the most popular president ever, the uniter-in-chief, and the recipient of the most votes for any person in united states history, it’s time to panic. 

Matters grew worse when a Nascar crowd broke into the chant while an NBC reporter was interviewing the winner of the Talladega race on Saturday, October 2nd. Brandon Brown’s first-ever Nascar victory was unfortunately overshadowed by what transpired next. In a masterful exercise in improvisation, the reporter asked Brown how he felt about the crowd chanting “Let’s go, Brandon!”, during the interview. Everyone watching the live TV broadcast could clearly hear the crowd screaming “f*ck Joe Biden”, and the video clip immediately went viral. Few people are blaming the reporter for the split-second decision, but the new chant has now taken the nation by storm, and by Saturday night, “#LetsGoBrandon” was trending. 

So, next time you hear a chant of “Let’s go, Brandon!” that seems out of place, quietly smile and acknowledge that you aren’t the only one around that hates the dictator of the united states. 

The post Let’s Go, Brandon! (#FJB) appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Your Children Are Government Property

The Liberty Block - Thu, 2021-10-07 04:26 +0000

For decades, politicians and their enforcers and associates have been taking over the power to raise children from parents. Many parents have been feeling this shift, but some have a difficult time placing a finger on the exact issue. Perhaps this article can clear up some issues regarding who owns children. 

Since 1918, all children in the united states have been forced by law to attend school. Some states allow for children to be home-schooled. However, it is extremely difficult for parents to receive even a small portion of their (school) taxes back, so the financially sensible decision is always to send children to public school. Those who send children to private school or educate them at home are making the wrong financial decision (though they are obviously making the overall better decision). 

As such, 90% of children in the united states attend public schools. Because these schools are totally run by the government (state/local with some federal influence), I will henceforth refer to them as ‘government schools’. 

Although math is now considered to be racist, we will need to do some basic arithmetic here. Each week has 168 hours. The average child spends 56 hours sleeping. Of the remaining 112 hours, the average child must attend school for an average of 7 hours every weekday, which is 35 hours per week. Accounting for travel to and from school, a child may spend around 7 hours in government school and around 7 hours at home with family each weekday. So, government agents co-parent with biological parents, but they allow the parents to see their children on weekends. 

True to their progressive nature, politicians always seek more control over people; they are never satisfied. In 2019, then-Senator Kamala Harris (D-California) proposed a bill to extend the government-school day by three hours. This would tip the balance from parents having more time with their children to government agents having more time with their children, limiting parental visitation with their own children to only around 4 waking hours per weekday. 

Keep in mind that children have plenty of homework to complete during those 4 hours. 

This legislation will pass through Congress, it’s only a matter of time.

It gets worse. 

Government agents have already made it clear that they will use corona-fascism as justification for taking children away from parents. Of course, politicians claim that anyone who does not get the COVID vaccine (even if they have natural antibodies) is clearly a reckless and dangerous parent who should not have custody of their children. So far, judges have only used this concept to take children from one parent and give custody to another, but this could easily be extended by CPS or the courts to include total removal of children from the home if their parents aren’t vaccinated, if they violate any corona-fascist law, or if they don’t vaccinate their children as soon as they are eligible. 

Of course, state governments also require children to receive certain vaccinations before attending government and/or private schools. Parents don’t get a vote – only politicians get to decide. We all know that government agents could easily come to your home anytime and take your children away. Realistically, there is little you’d be able to do to stop them. In fact, few people would even consider such an act illegitimate. 

The curriculum that children are taught in government schools is totally controlled by government officials. The federal dept. Of education, the state dept. Of education, and local school boards pretend to accept input from parents regarding what they teach children, but they don’t actually care what parents desire – and they don’t have to care. They are the government. They have the guns and they call the shots. Now that corona-fascism, racist indoctrination, and disturbing sexualization of children have caused millions of parents to wake up and condemn school boards at their meetings, the government agents are pushing back.

In early October, the Attorney General (a DC politician) sent a memo to federal law enforcement agencies “directing the Federal Bureau of Investigations, working with each United States Attorney, to convene meetings with federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial leaders within 30 days…” in order to “…facilitate the discussion of strategies for addressing threats against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.” 

The memo justifies the crackdown as combating a “disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.”

Many pro-freedom parents are shocked and furious that the federal government will work with federal, state, and local cops to crush political opposition and concerned parents who disagree with government schools indoctrinating their children. This should not be shocking, though. 

The government is the primary custodian of your children; you just have pretty good visitation hours. If you don’t return your children to the government on Monday morning, men with guns will come for you. If the government doesn’t return your children after their visitation, they cannot be held accountable – they are the government, after all, so they are the law!

In the eyes of government agents (cops, teachers, Biden, Garland, etc.) parents who want to have input on how the government educates their children are nosey bastards overstepping their boundaries.

In a recent debate, leftist leader, Terry McCauliffe said it simply: “I don’t think parents should be telling schools what they should teach!”

The National School Boards Association sent a letter to the Dept. of Justice asking them to investigate concerned parents who yell at school board members for “domestic terrorism“.

Time and again, politicians demonstrate that they cannot be reasoned with. The only way to ensure that your children receive a proper education free from abuse, corona-fascism, racism, and sexualization is to educate them at home yourself.

The post Your Children Are Government Property appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Newly Minted Dem Files Bill To Kick Pro-Independence Reps From NH House, According To Sources

The Liberty Block - Wed, 2021-10-06 05:13 +0000

A legislative service request (LSR) has been filed in the New Hampshire House for legislation that would amend the state laws governing which types of people could hold office as a state representative. Though only the title of the bill is currently public, sources have provided The Liberty Block with the language for a bill filed by one of the most controversial members of the New Hampshire House.

Over the course of a few weeks leading up to the September filing period for legislation, a group of pro-independence activists and state representatives held weekly work sessions to strategize the proposal of the landmark legislation. The meetings involved Rep. Mike Sylvia, Rep. Matt Santanastaso, Rep. Tom Ploszaj, and a few activists, including myself. All of the strategy sessions took place in video meetings that were posted for the public to see. We have all been totally transparent throughout this process because we have nothing to hide. We simply want to sever all ties to DC, and we have over 80 good reasons for supporting independence. 

Ultimately, Mike Sylvia stepped up as the prime sponsor, and eight other representatives have since signed on as co-sponsors. If passed by 60% of the House and 60% of the Senate, the CACR would be placed on the ballot next November for the people to vote on. If 66% of NH voters supported the measure, New Hampshire’s Constitution would officially be amended, adding an article stating that it peacefully separates from the union and becomes an independent, self-governing state. 

At the same time, a state representative who lives near Sylvia – but whose views on liberty could not possibly be farther away – was proposing another bill relating to state independence. As a former doctor (ophthalmologist) and current advocate for corona-fascism, Marsh has become quite controversial in New Hampshire over the past year. As his embrace for medical tyranny grew stronger, Republican voters throughout New Hampshire were growing frustrated with the rapidly expanding authoritarianism encouraged by Dictator Sununu and legislators like Marsh. 

On September 14th, Marsh officially changed his party affiliation from Republican to Democrat. He told NBC that he supported corona-fascism too much, and NH Republicans were far too libertarian for him. “I cannot stand idly by while extremists reject the reasonable precautions of vaccinations and masks…”The faction that’s currently dominant in the Republican Party in the House in New Hampshire opposes vaccines and masks and mandates of any kind, and are of the opinion that public health measures are unconstitutional…I believe Supreme Court case law shows that not to be the case.”

Of course, the vaccines are largely not necessary, not as safe as they’d like you to believe, and not very effective. And masks don’t work. I wrote dozens of articles and a whole book about corona-fascism and the lies involved in it. 

In addition to supporting vaccine mandates and opposing individual liberty, Marsh strongly opposes peaceful separation from DC, and believes that the government should use force to keep New Hampshire under the rule of DC politicians. He supports DC politicians so much that he does not even want to allow the people of New Hampshire to have the opportunity to vote on independence. But he went much further than simply refusing to support Sylvia’s common-sense legislation, which would put independence on the ballot if passed by the legislature. Marsh proposed a bill titled: ‘Relative to Qualifications for Office’. 

According to a source, the text of his bill adds to the list of persons who are not qualified to hold office in the New Hampshire legislature, and reads: 

1) Amend RSA 652:12 by adding VII to read as follows:

VII. Is determined by the General Court [the legislature] to have engaged in insurrection or rebellion, or given aid or comfort to the enemies of the state, in violation of RSA 655:1-a. This shall be determined by the house of representatives in the case of a member of the house of representatives and by the senate in the case of a member of the senate.

2) Amend RSA 655 by adding RSA 655:1-a to read as follows:

RSA 655:1-a Insurrection or Rebellion Prohibited.

As provided in Article 14, section 3, of the federal constitution, a person who engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or who gave aid or comfort to the enemies thereof, shall be ineligible to hold elective office in the state, unless Congress, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, shall have removed such disability. For the purposes of this subparagraph, “insurrection or rebellion” shall include any action intended to separate New Hampshire from the United States, and “aid or comfort” shall include any action facilitating such intent.

3) Effective upon passage.

I find this bill extremely interesting for a few reasons: 

  1. This bill certainly seems to be directed at Sylvia and the co-sponsors, and potentially at any other legislator who supports or votes for the legislation.
  2. Although he is a new Democrat, Marsh seems adept at using dog-whistles for radical leftists. He uses the term ‘insurrection’ three times in his short bill. 
  3. This bill is highly illegal because it violates the New Hampshire Constitution’s protections of free speech. 
  4. Sylvia laughed about the bill and strongly believes that Marsh will withdraw it once he realizes how pathetic and doomed it is.
  5. Marsh and the Democrats are clearly threatened by the New Hampshire independence movement, which is growing much stronger each day. 
  6. The New Hampshire Constitution’s Article 10 very clearly protects and encourages revolution against tyrannical government: “…whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.”
  7. Despite supporting the colonists’ rebellion and secession against the tyrannical King George (who was much less tyrannical than modern DC politicians), Marsh also opposes secession so fiercely that he wants to ban secessionists from holding office. Hilariously, Marsh’s website states that he enjoys “marching in Wolfeboro’s Independence Day parade and shooting my musket”.

The post Newly Minted Dem Files Bill To Kick Pro-Independence Reps From NH House, According To Sources appeared first on The Liberty Block.

No, Politicians Do NOT Waste Your Tax dollars

The Liberty Block - Tue, 2021-10-05 01:08 +0000

Many conservatives believe that politicians should tax their citizens in order to fund government services and projects. Support for the military, law enforcement, courts, border security, and education, and a small amount of welfare seem popular among conservatives, though they often believe that the government wastes too much money or uses it on the wrong projects. 

Taking a slightly different view, libertarians believe that politicians generally waste money, and they generally spend too much. Libertarians would say that politicians support unnecessary programs, such as war, surveillance, prohibition, education, and welfare. 

Voluntaryists and anarcho-capitalists have a radically different perspective. First, they believe that politicians should not steal ANY money from any person by force. If theft is immoral and unacceptable in a civil society, we should not excuse theft simply for being ‘minimal’ or ‘used for popular programs’. Second, many voluntaryists believe that politicians do not generally waste our tax dollars. If they did light our money on fire or throw it into the garbage, voluntaryists would be quite happy (not just because it would cause a deflation of the money supply) compared to how they feel about the government now. What politicians do with the money they steal from us is much more sinister than simply wasting it: They use that money to hurt us, control us, and kill us. They use the money to make our lives miserable and to erode our freedom increasingly every day. And you are forced to fund it. 

If you have concerns about the increasingly tyrannical police and surveillance state, keep in mind that all of those programs are funded by politicians with your tax dollars. Don’t like perpetual wars in every state on Earth? You are funding those billion-dollar missiles, planes, tanks, and guns. 

But doesn’t the US government use tax dollars to protect us from evil terrorists like the Taliban? Actually, they used your tax dollars to buy 25 billion dollars worth of military weapons – which were then given to the Taliban. The DC politicians did the same with ISIS. Your tax dollars also pay for billions of dollars of welfare to nearly every nation on the planet. Every evil thing that politicians do – from suppressing ivermectin to enforcing corona-fascism, is all funded by your tax dollars. 

Lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, controlling and shutting businesses? You pay for the politicians and cops to enforce every corona-fascist mandate. 

The IRS will soon hire 87,000 more agents and will soon have perpetual access to your bank account, so you won’t be able to hide anything from them. Who will pay for the massive increase in the IRS budget? You will, of course! 

Moral people who don’t want to hurt others ought to do everything in their power to stop funding the criminals who justify their increasingly abusive behavior by masquerading as ‘the government’. 

The post No, Politicians Do NOT Waste Your Tax dollars appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Counting Our Victories

The Liberty Block - Tue, 2021-10-05 00:42 +0000

In less than twenty-four hours, there has already been lots of commentary about the events of October 2nd in Concord. An estimated fifteen hundred people were moved to come out and march for medical freedom. I read that not even Obama threatening our guns drew that many people to the New Hampshire State House. But that should be no surprise. These medical mandates fly in the face of what should be the most sacrosanct thing in our lives: our own bodies. It tells us that we must alter and change our bodies for the supposed benefit of others.

Now if we choose to make a sacrifice — to put our bodies at risk as part of our career or personal calling, then that is to be commended. But it’s the free choice that sanctifies that act, not the decree of a bureaucrat. That is why the voluntary decision to give up a few hours on a beautiful Saturday afternoon by a few hundred people is so much more meaningful than the coerced decision of millions of people to submit to an experimental injection “to protect others” or “so that they can travel.” 

I commend you, patriots. 

I have witnessed a movement grow from a rag-tag handful of freedom fighters holding flags in front of Dartmouth Hitchcock Lebanon to fifteen hundred people from all walks of life flooding the streets of Concord.

As with any other movement, there will be growing pains. On September 29th just a few days before the massive rally in Concord a sizeable group of protestors showed up to urge the executive council to reject a $27 million federal grant, which would require NH to obey DC politicians and regulators in all matters related to COVID, including assisting them with their ‘quarantine and isolation’ camps and expanding the state vaccine registry. The crowd was loud and Governor Sununu opted to cancel the vote. WMUR and left-wing politicians wasted no time calling this “insurrectionist behavior.” The personality largely responsible for the shutdown of the meeting further polarized members of the crowd toward the very end of the Concord rally. Without condoning violent behavior or language I would remind everyone that this movement is too big for any one person and none of us are going to be perfect messengers. 

For example, in the past month or so, I have seen Black Lives Matter and Nicki Minaj strike back against the mandates and online censorship much harder than some of the most die-hard conservatives and libertarians in our movement have been able to thus far. I may disagree with the majority of BLM’s positions and I may find Nicki Minaj’s music distasteful but we still have so-called Republicans and libertarians that are too afraid to touch this issue and the ones that will touch it do not necessarily reach the same audience. If we can live to fight another day, we can debate our other differences and try to find better solutions for society (including potential peaceful separation from the union due to irreconcilable differences), but open debate cannot occur in a media environment that stifles the free flow of information.

So count your victories patriots because we have scored many. Our demonstrations get bigger with every passing week. Let’s not allow controversy and natural infighting to overshadow the amazing display of strength and solidarity we had this past weekend.

Further reading:

Americans United for Peaceful Separation

One Nation Under Tyranny?

82 Reasons New Hampshire Should Divorce DC

Foundation for New Hampshire Independence – First Before. First Again.

NH Exit | Peacefully exiting the United States

The post Counting Our Victories appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Breaking: Facebook, Instagram, Messenger Are All Down

The Liberty Block - Mon, 2021-10-04 17:24 +0000

On Monday morning, Facebook went offline, along with its subsidiaries, Instagram, WhatsApp, and FB Messenger. The world-leading social media site has not had an outage in years, and has functioned relatively free of glitches for quite a while.

Facebook published a tweet at 12:22 apologizing for the outage:

Some social media users are wondering whether last night’s whistleblower report has anything to do with the outage. The Associated Press reported last night that Facebook turned off safeguards and promoted misinformation, fueling the January 6th protest in DC:

When visiting Facebook.com, users see this message:

This comes as alternative pro-liberty social media platforms have been rapidly growing over the past few months, including Flote, MeWe, Gab, Parler, Minds, Odysee, Mastodon, and others.

Some Twitter users are gloating that Twitter is up and Facebook is down. Facebook is many multiples larger than Twitter, though Twitter punches well above its weight due to its high number of active users who are very political.

We will update this article as the story develops.

UPDATE: So much web traffic moved to Twitter that its servers were overwhelmed, causing the site to have functional issues for many users.

UPDATE: As of 7:30 PM eastern, Facebook is back online.

The post Breaking: Facebook, Instagram, Messenger Are All Down appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Masks Don’t Work

The Liberty Block - Sun, 2021-10-03 13:00 +0000

It has come to my attention that some people unfortunately still believe that masks protect the wearer and/or those around them from COVID-19. Real data from many studies – and from real life – have demonstrated that masks have no efficacy in stopping COVID-19 transmission. 

For the sake of clarity, the 3 most common types of masks used by the general public are N95 masks, surgical masks, and homemade fabric masks. N95s are by far the superior devices among the three types. However, even they do not have any significant effect on COVID transmission. Surgical masks have even less efficacy. And the homemade lingerie masks are not even worth discussing.

Below is an excerpt from my book, ‘Corona-Fascism’, which simply lists the studies that prove that masks cannot stop COVID or even the much larger flu virus particles:

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419. 

“N95-masked health-care workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”

Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456. 

“None of the studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or community members in households (H).” 

bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267. 

“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”

Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016

“We identified six clinical studies…In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-place absenteeism.”

Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017, Pages 1934–1942

“Self-reported assessment of clinical outcomes was prone to bias. Evidence of a protective effect of masks or respirators against verified respiratory infection (VRI) was not statistically significant.”

Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA. 2019; 322(9): 824–833

“Among 2,862 randomized participants, 2,371 completed the study and accounted for 5,180 HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.” 

Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med. 2020; 1- 9.

“A total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza, laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Alonso, S. et al. (2021) “Age-dependency of the Propagation Rate of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Inside School Bubble Groups in Catalonia, Spain,” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

“More than 1 million students were organized in bubble groups and monitored and analyzed by the Health and the Educational departments…The secondary attack rate depends on the school level and therefore on the age.” (this study found no more COVID transmission in unmasked 5 year-olds than in masked 6 year-olds)

Furthermore, states without mask mandates such as South Dakota (and Florida, which has been relatively free of corona-fascism over the past year) have had no worse outcomes by any measurable statistics when compared to states with moderate to severe mask mandates and lockdowns. In fact, the data seems to suggest that mask mandates are correlated with worse COVID rates:

Lockdowns and Mask Mandates Do Not Lead to Reduced COVID

Mask mandate and use efficacy in state-level COVID-19 containment

New Study Shows Mask Mandates Had Zero Effect in Florida or Nationwide, But the Lie Continues

The two most powerful types of data in clinical research are studies in labs (or scientific experiments) and real-world data. Both types of evidence show that masks do not prevent COVID spread. 

Can we please stop pretending that masks stop COVID transmission?

The post Masks Don’t Work appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Massive Protest In Concord: “We Will Not Comply”

The Liberty Block - Sun, 2021-10-03 04:23 +0000

On Saturday, October 2nd, about 1,500 people marched through the streets of Concord in opposition to government-mandated medical procedures, in an effort led by Health Freedom New Hampshire. Afterward, marchers gathered at the steps of the statehouse for a live music performance by Becca Myari and to rally around multiple pro-liberty speakers.

The energy was high, with frequent chants of “we will not comply!”, “live free or die!”, and “my body my choice!”, to name a few. Perhaps one of the best chants was, “turn it off!” in reference to the mainstream media and social media, which have played a key role in perpetuating fear and stoking societal division.

Despite the loud chanting and the size of the crowd, the march was incredibly peaceful and included a diverse group of individuals with a variety of political leanings. For example, there were signs that read, “BLM is right about vaccines” and “health mandates disproportionally harm people of color”, indicating the formation of potential alliances that were once unthinkable.

There were even some new activists in the crowd who had never been to a political rally in their lives, but recently found themselves motivated by the critical issue of bodily autonomy.

This single unifying issue will continue to bring more activists into the liberty movement and will fuel the grassroots resistance to medical tyranny in the Granite State. The march on October 2nd is evidence that a significant portion of people will not accept forced medical procedures in exchange for perceived freedom. 

Many of the protesters were openly carrying firearms, and one man decided to exercise both his freedom to wear a mask and to carry a loaded AR-15 throughout the parade, which spanned around a half a mile and ended at the statehouse. 

Some protesters mentioned that if the virus were really as dangerous as the elites claim, they would have died after 2 years of protesting in dense gatherings without masks. 

The people of New Hampshire are losing patience with their government servants and they are hoping that they will stop being abused by government agents. 

Interestingly, the largely Republican, conservative, and libertarian crowd made their disdain for Republican Dictator Chris Sununu very clear throughout the protest. If he doesn’t make some drastic changes, Sununu may not even win his next primary, because his support among the conservative base is in free-fall. 

Thousands of pro-freedom conservatives, libertarians, and formerly-mainstream Republicans in New Hampshire are growing increasingly disgusted with the increasing corona-fascism and tyranny in general. The phrase “f*ck around and find out” can be seen increasingly often with each protest, indicating that New Hampshire residents are running out of peaceful ways to make politicians realize that they will not comply with tyranny.

The post Massive Protest In Concord: “We Will Not Comply” appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Free State To Receive More Visitors Post Jeremy Kauffman Interview

Free Keene - Fri, 2021-10-01 21:40 +0000

Jeremy Kauffman, LBRY founder, Free State Project board member, husband and father, yesterday joined a two hour conversation with Tim Pool and Ian Crossland. It’s an informative, timely, and freewheeling exchange.

Kauffman did a bang-up job highlighting the already significant impact of liberty-oriented doers in the Free State of New Hampshire and the potential that exists here going forward. He is well-versed, on-point, and approachable, and his message will undoubtedly inspire viewers to visit (perhaps for Liberty Forum) and vote with their feet.

Take a look:

Props to Kauffman for taking the time and to Pool for extending an invite.

 

Trans Satanist She-Male to Mayoral Competitor Facing Stalking Allegations: “you’re a creep”

Free Keene - Fri, 2021-10-01 20:14 +0000

Aria DiMezzo to Mark Zuchowski: “you’re a creep”.

Normally, the Keene mayoral primary is pretty uneventful. This year, however, according to the Keene Sentinel, a major bombshell just dropped regarding one of the three candidates, 66-year-old Mark J. Zuchowski, a newcomer to Keene politics.

Zuchowski has been accused of stalking by city clerk office worker Heather Fitz-Simon. Though Zuchowski hasn’t been charged criminally in the matter, he has been no-trespassed from Fitz-Simon’s home and is facing a hearing on a stalking petition brought by Fitz-Simon on October 6th at 2:30pm in Cheshire Superior Court. According to the Sentinel story, Zuchowski spent inordinate time hanging around the city clerk’s office, rambling about his dead mother and shaking a seltzer bottle, then explaining to Fitz-Simon his habit of creepily watching a young woman who works near his home. Zuchowski allegedly emailed city staff about his observation of the woman, explaining he’s watching her daily to make sure she is able to get inside her workplace safely. He emailed Fitz-Simon inviting her – a married woman – out on a date, later claiming it was only to discuss his campaign.

If all Zuchowski did was make a awkward pass at a city employee, that wouldn’t be so bad. However he then showed up at Fitz-Simon’s house, blocked the driveway with his car, took photos of the home, and rung the doorbell, allegedly multiple times. When police were called, he was given a no-trespass order and still didn’t leave immediately. He tried to claim he was just looking to see if Fitz-Simon had received his email invite, bizarrely excusing his photographing the home by explaining he thought he’d been there before while apartment hunting in the past. He claims he wanted to give her a small pumpkin and a note complimenting her appearance and reiterating his invite to an antiques show.

Obviously, there are two sides to every story, but I can personally confirm the dude is weird. When I was filing to run for at-large city council in early September, Zuchowski was in the clerk’s office being overly-friendly with the city staff. He was acting like he belonged there. Since he’s relatively new to town, I only know it was him because he introduced himself to another person who happened to walk into the office at the same time. At the moment, I chalked his behavior up to being a little-too-enthusiastic about being the next mayor, though he did strike me as odd at the time.

Mark J Zuchowski, Alleged Creep

Plus, check out the rambling twenty-four page bio he submitted to the city clerk’s office regarding his campaign for mayor of Keene. On just the first page he explains he feels like he has a father-and-son relationship with current mayor George Hansel and excoriates Hansel for attending protests last summer during the governor’s “stay at home” order, then uses math formulas to calculate how protestors violated social distancing. Apparently, Zuchowski was an engineer prior to retiring to Keene from his original home in Massachusetts. He worked for defense contractors developing weapons for the military to murder innocents around the world, yet claims to be a lifelong Christian.

This year’s mayoral candidates are Zuchowski, incumbent mayor George Hansel, and trans Satanist anarchist she-male Aria DiMezzo. Last year, DiMezzo made headlines nationwide in a viral explosion of news coverage for her defeat of the longtime Republican candidate-for-sheriff in the primary, though she ultimately lost in the general election to the incumbent Democrat sheriff.

In a post responding to the news about Zuchowski, DiMezzo said, “Look, when you’ve made someone uncomfortable, you should notice that, and stop making them uncomfortable. The only misunderstanding here is that you’re a creep who is creepily creeping on some chick, and you refuse to recognize that. Stop being a creep.” Zuchowski claims the whole situation is a misunderstanding. The primary election is this Tuesday, October 5th. One of the three candidates will be eliminated Tuesday and two move on to the November 2nd general election.

Please come out Tuesday and vote for Aria DiMezzo. Polling place information is here on the City website. You can register to vote at the polls if you aren’t registered yet. Remember voting in a primary means your vote counts even more than normal, since almost no one ever bothers. You can get more information about Aria at the Reformed Satanic Church blog, of which she is the High Priestess and her official campaign website, KeeneQueen.com.

After 15 Months Of Controlling Private Business, Sununu Says He Can’t Control Private Business

The Liberty Block - Thu, 2021-09-30 18:47 +0000

Throughout 2020 and part of 2021, Dictator Chris Sununu ruled over New Hampshire with the iron fist of a typical corona-fascist. In March of 2020, he shut out the legislature and assumed full control over the state. Over the next 15 months, he would go on to pass a multitude of laws without any input from the elected legislators. 

Among the 86 emergency orders that Sununu passed into law with a stroke of his pen were many brutal mandates that took over control of private businesses. Some of the most impactful orders included:

Emergency Order #4 prohibited landlords and rental businesses from evicting tenants, even if they did not pay their rent. 

Emergency Order #17 forced all non-essential businesses to shut down indefinitely. 

Emergency Order #65 seemingly authorized law enforcement agents to enter any property without a warrant or consent of the owner, as long as it was for a reason related to corona-fascism. “We’re going to have our enforcement teams out there”, said Sununu.

Emergency Order #74 mandated that all people wear a mask, with a few exceptions. 

In October of 2020, Dictator Sununu mandated that all restaurants begin contact tracing on all patrons. This forced restaurants to pay staff to violate their customers’ privacy by asking them to write their names and phone numbers on sheets that remained in public view. Sununu justified this by claiming that the information could be used to contact all of the customers who may have been exposed to COVID if they ever hear that a customer tested positive. We cannot find the actual emergency order number.

In June of 2021, after crushing the red-hot economy of New Hampshire, putting thousands of people out of work, and causing thousands of children to be needlessly abused with masks, isolation, and fear propaganda, Dictator Sununu ended the 15-month long ‘state of emergency’. This allowed the legislature to once again legislate. 

Late Tuesday night, in comments with citizens concerned about Sununu’s support for corona-fascism, the Dictator repeatedly told the exasperated commenters that he could not help them fight against the discrimination in workplaces because he does not have and should not have the power to do anything that could influence a private business, even if the private business was funded by and controlled by the government. The citizens wanted Sununu to commit to opposing vaccine passports and mask mandates by private businesses. 

Sununu told commenters that controlling a business would be ‘communist’, and distanced himself from that type of governance. Sununu claimed that the state has zero regulation on hospitals, although the state website indicates that they have tremendous amounts of them. He claimed that he would never tell a business what they can or cannot do. 

When China’s public-private partnership economy was mentioned, he suggested that one constituent moves to China to experience real communism. When asked what set the united states apart from China, Sununu repeatedly failed to answer. Screenshots are attached below.

The post After 15 Months Of Controlling Private Business, Sununu Says He Can’t Control Private Business appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Legislative Services Approves Constitutional Amendment for NH Independence

NHexit.US - Wed, 2021-09-29 16:13 +0000

We have an update on the process to get a constitutional amendment on the ballot which would declare independence from the United States. A couple of weeks ago, liberty state representative Mike Sylvia filed his proposed constitutional amendment with “Legislative Services”, the state government bureaucracy that reviews all proposed bills filed by the senators and state reps. Two weeks later, they returned to him the officially drafted CACR or “Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution”, which you can see for yourself here.

Sylvia’s proposed amendment wording was untouched, and in the “voter’s guide” they added this excellent summary:

AT THE PRESENT TIME, New Hampshire exists as a sovereign state of the United States of America.
IF THE AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED, New Hampshire will peaceably declare independence from the United States of America and proceed as its own sovereign nation.

State Reps Mike Sylvia & Matt Santonastaso

That should make it clear to voters what this amendment will do, should it make it to the ballot. The next step is Sylvia must get his co-sponsors to sign on. He recently reported that he has several other reps who have told him they would like to co-sponsor. He must submit the co-sponsors and any final changes by October 7th, next Friday.

Then, Legislative Services will assign a number to the bill, so it will be “CACR X” (where X is whatever number they assign) and it will next be officially set for a committee hearing in early 2022! That is when people will be able to show up and testify publicly regarding their support – or opposition to New Hampshire independence. Exciting times! Stay tuned here to NHexit.US for the latest.

Dictator Sununu Wants to Give DC Politicians TOTAL Control Over NH

The Liberty Block - Wed, 2021-09-29 04:06 +0000

By Karen Testerman for The Liberty Block

The Unconstitutional Vaccine Registry snake is slithering into St. Anselm’s Institute of Politics tomorrow morning to lure the members of the Executive Council to consume the $27 million bait to further ensnare the people of New Hampshire.  

As advertised, the Dictator Sununu has put the receipt of $27 million in federal funds to expand the unconstitutional vaccine registry (vaccine database to track who has been given the Covid-19 jabs) on the agenda for the Executive Council to approve for the state to receive.  But, WAIT!!!…

What happened to your Right to Privacy?  

In 2018, we the people voted to amend the State Constitution to declare our right to privacy by 81%?  As Executive Councilor Dave Wheeler told me when being asked information beyond name, rank and serial number…”NOYB”(None of your business).

Look…here it is:

Part 1 [Art.] 2-b. [Right of Privacy.] An individual’s right to live free from governmental intrusion in private or personal information is natural, essential, and inherent.
December 5, 2018

This is a clear violation that is repugnant to the Constitution – the Law of the Land in New Hampshire!

NO Calvary is coming to save us from this tyranny!  

It is up to each one of us to engage in the battle. 

The line was drawn in the sand when you voted to secure our Right to Privacy in 2018.

Find your position to fight back.  How?

Tomorrow, SEPT. 29th – 7:30 AM 

Come to Manchester with your signs…

YOUR PRESENCE WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!

Saint Anselm Institute of Politics

100 Saint Anselm Drive

Manchester, NH

7:30 AM – WE NEED EVERYONE THERE TOMORROW!!! WE NEED 1,000 PEOPLE!!!

Pressure the Councilors to protect our Right to Privacy.  Remind them that this is their job!!!

Assemble with other patriots just outside this meeting, starting at 7:30 AM at Saint Anselm’s College in Goffstown. Sununu is pushing hard to pass this UNCONSTITUTIONAL database expansion. You need to stand up for your rights…

If you cannot come, then call or email your Executive Councilor.  

Extracted from “Additional Terms and Conditions of Award”“(CDC) hereby incorporates Immunization and Vaccines for Children, which are hereby made a part of this Non-research award”“

A recipient of a grant or cooperative agreement… agrees, as applicable to the award, to:

1) comply with existing and/or future directives and guidance from the Secretary (a DC politician)

2) assist the United States Government in the implementation and enforcement of federal orders related to quarantine and isolation.”

[in addiiton] “the recipient is expected to provide to CDC copies of and/or access to COVID-19 data collected with these funds, included but not limited to data related to COVID-19 testing CDC will specify in further guidance and directives what is encompassed in this requirement.” So: among other things, if this money (“award”) is accepted, [the agree-ers] will have to agree to comply with and all as-yet-unknown “future directives and guidance,” in addition to currently explicit “enforcement of federal orders related to quarantine and isolation.”

States that have accepted this federal grant – and the conditions that accompany it – have reportedly been posting these jobs recently:

Keep this for future reference

New Hampshire Executive Council


107 North Main Street
State House, Room 207
Concord, NH 0330Phone: (603) 271-3632
Fax: (603) 271-3633

Website: www.nh.gov/council
E-mail: gcweb@nh.gov
Meagan Rose, Executive Assistant 

New Hampshire Executive Council Members
January 6, 2021

District One
Joseph D. Kenney
PO Box 201
Union, New Hampshire 03887

Executive Council Office: (603) 271-3632
Office Email: Joseph.D.Kenney@nh.gov
Cell: (603) 581-8780

District Two
Cinde Warmington
PO Box 2133
Concord, New Hampshire 03301

Executive Council Office: (603) 271-3632
Office Email: Cinde.Warmington@nh.gov
Cell: (603) 387-0481

District Three
Janet Stevens
PO Box 687
Rye, New Hampshire 03870

Executive Council Office: (603) 271-3632
Office Email: Janet.L.Stevens@nh.gov
Cell: (603) 498-0546

District Four
Ted Gatsas
PO Box 6655
20 Market Street
Manchester, New Hampshire 03108

Executive Council Office: (603) 271-3632
Office Email: Ted.Gatsas@nh.gov
Office: (603) 623-0211

District Five
David K. Wheeler
523 Mason Road
Milford, New Hampshire 03055

Executive Council Office: (603) 271-3632
Office Email: David.K.Wheeler@nh.gov
Home: (603) 672-6062

The post Dictator Sununu Wants to Give DC Politicians TOTAL Control Over NH appeared first on The Liberty Block.

NH Independence Hoodies, T-Shirts Now Available!

NHexit.US - Tue, 2021-09-28 22:28 +0000

NH Independence Hoodie – Order Here

The weather in New Hampshire is getting colder, so warm up with the brand-new NH Independence hoodie! Thanks to freedom-loving artist TopLobsta, you can now get a special two-sided version of his “It’s not you, it’s me” hoodie, with “NHexit.US” on the back. It’s also available in t-shirt form.

Check it out and order yours online here. All proceeds go to TopLobsta, the creator of the design.

He also has some one-sided versions without the NHexit.US logo on the back, if you’d prefer that style. Though the clothes with the website URL make it clear to the viewer what they can do to learn more, so I’m grateful that TopLobsta added the site to the design.

So this fall, keep yourself warm, let your neighbors know you support peaceful NH Independence from the evil federal government and get some conversations started!

It’s not you – it’s me.

State Rep Mike Sylvia and Liberty Block’s Alu Axelman Interviewed About #NHexit Amendment

NHexit.US - Fri, 2021-09-24 03:34 +0000

State Rep Mike Sylvia Committing Civil Disobedience in 2014

Tune into this informative interview of the main sponsor of the proposed constitutional amendment that would have New Hampshire peacefully declare independence from the United States.

State representative Mike Sylvia appeared on “Declare Your Independence” along with Liberty Block‘s Alu Axelman talked with host Ernest Hancock about how the bill was created and filed, why independence is necessary, and Mike explains the accessible political process here in NH. You’re guaranteed to learn something.

Download the MP3 here.

Breaking: Republicans File Articles of Impeachment Against Biden

The Liberty Block - Thu, 2021-09-23 00:35 +0000

On Wednesday evening, Fox reported that four Republican Representatives in the US House filed articles of impeachment against Joe Biden. 

Congressman Bob Gibbs from Ohio is joined by fellow Republican congressman Andy Biggs, Brian Babin, and Randy Weber.

The Republicans – who are among the very small contingent of GOP House members who have taken real action against Dictator Biden – believe that he violated his duties by failing to secure the border from a southern invasion, extending the eviction moratorium despite the Supreme Court telling him he lacked the authority and the horrific withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

Of course, Biden has already committed many other vicious acts, including suppressing and restricting life-saving medications like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and monoclonal antibodies so that he could keep his coronafascism going.

Congressman James Comer from Kentucky released a document outlining 100 failures by the corrupt Dictator within his first 100 days in office. 

Biden may be the least popular president in history. Only 46% of Americans approve of his actions, according to a left-leaning publication poll. In my experience, around 98% of Americans hate Biden and consider him to be evil. For the first time in history, YouTube has had to resort to deleting ‘dislikes’ (thumbs-downs) on YouTube videos featuring the career politician. 

The Democrat-controlled House is unlikely to vote in favor of the impeachment. 

We will update this story as it develops. 

On September 24th, Representative Boebert announced that she filed articles of impeachment against Dictator Biden. Reps. Andy Biggs, Jeff Duncan, Ralph Norman, Louie Gohmert, and Jody Hice co-sponsored Rep. Boebert’s articles of impeachment.

In January of 2021, Representative Greene introduced articles of impeachment against Dictator Biden.

The post Breaking: Republicans File Articles of Impeachment Against Biden appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Why Progressives Should Support Peaceful Separation

The Liberty Block - Mon, 2021-09-20 23:27 +0000

Now that talk about peaceful separation is becoming increasingly mainstream, we’d like to take a look at why progressive left-leaning individuals may support such a movement. Typically, people believe that state independence is a purely right-wing phenomenon. However, progressive states are actually leading the way when it comes to reclaiming state sovereignty from DC.

According to federal law, cannabis is currently a schedule-1 controlled substance, which is the highest level of prohibition on any substance that the US government has. Stated another way, nothing is more harmful, dangerous, and addictive than cannabis, according to DC politicians. Federal law includes a 1-3 year prison sentence for anyone caught with any amount of cannabis. Selling large amounts of cannabis could result in life in prison, according to current federal law. In response to the insanity of DC politicians, progressive states from California to New York have ‘nullified’ federal law by simply passing legislation to tell all their law enforcement officials to ignore the federal laws that contradict the progressive values held by the citizens in the state. 

Similarly, progressive states all over the union have nullified federal immigration law. Many individuals and legislators on the left side of the spectrum believe that the immigration policies and enforcement controlled by DC politicians violate their values. So, they have nullified federal immigration law by passing legislation to become sanctuary states. 

The problem? 

At any moment, DC politicians can step up their enforcement and/or begin to punish states that flout their laws. The federal government takes billions of dollars from taxpayers in progressive states each year. They send some of that money back to the state governments, but only as long as they obey the wishes of DC elites. If the US government decides to stop sending that money back to any state that does not obey federal cannabis and immigration law to a tee, life would change drastically for around 50 million progressives overnight. 

Additional issues that might be of concern to progressives include the extreme prohibition of abortion that the Supreme Court of the US government recently refused to block, federal politicians rolling back gun control, and the elimination of democratic voting rights measures, and the passing of voter ID laws. 

What could be done to prevent this disaster? 

Progressives who are concerned about the conflicting ideologies between DC politicians and their own state legislatures may want to consider peaceful separation from DC before matters make such a separation difficult or impossible. 

The post Why Progressives Should Support Peaceful Separation appeared first on The Liberty Block.

The Manchester Free Press aims to bring together in one place everything that you need to know about what’s happening in the Free State of New Hampshire.

As of August 2021, we are currently in the process of removing dead links and feeds, and updating the site with newer ones.

Articles

Media

Blogs

Our friends & allies

New Hampshire

United States