The Manchester Free Press

Friday • August 12 • 2022


Manchester, N.H.

BLM: Vaccine Passports Are Racist

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 19:30 +0000

A co-founder of BLM in New York City says that 72% of blacks between 18 and 44 in the Big Apple are unvaccinated. Gee, I guess they don’t trust the government? She also says disenfranchising unvaccinated blacks is discrimination.

So, if you refuse to culturally appropriate mayor de Blasio’s white public health culture it is discrimination to demand proof of vaccination before being allowed access to a product or service?

Something like that, and BLM NYC is ready to riot if this sh!t don’t stop.

Or is it more about the color of the person with or without the government-approved “papers?”

It’s actually a bit confusing to me (I am white so what do I know) but,


Newsome warned: “We’re putting this city on notice, that your mandate will not be another racist social-distance practice. Black people are not going to stand by, or you will see another uprising. And that is not a threat; that is a promise. The vaccination passport is not a free passport to racism.”

Black Women’s March co-founder Kimberly Bernard stated: “We are serving notice on the mayor, on the governor, on the restaurant industry that we will not allow for you to use this pandemic, vaccination cards, and masks as another reason to be racist, to put us in prison. Because there’s enough of us in there.”


So, if I understand this correctly, a Marxist group is appropriating the liberties of a constitutional republic and then claiming that making blacks produce proof of a vaccination they do not want is racist. How do they feel when The Man makes whitey do the same thing and then refuses them service?

I could guess but then, I’m still going to agree in part with BLM.

Forcing someone to accept a medical treatment they may not want or need for whatever reason is sinister. A government forcing private businesses to deny them any prospect of a normal life (employment, shopping, dining, travel) for failing to comply is evil.

If calling it discrimination or racism is the only lens through which you can view this you have other issues that need to be addressed. But I’m not saying you’re wrong. The government (in New York) is deliberately trying to discriminate against anyone unvaccinated as a way to intimidate them into accepting a treatment they may not need or want.

Denying you public access on this basis is not racist but it is discriminatory and you could get a lot more help if you dropped the skin color and marched against the passports

de Blasio wants you trapped on the no-vaxx reservation (the American Indians must have some thoughts, here) regardless of race, color religion, sex, etc. until you agree to surrender on their terms.

But let’s not be racist about racism.

Unvaccinated jews can’t live a normal life in NYVC either. Catholics, Sikhs, Latinos, Italians, Germans, tall people, Women, Men, Transpeople, shote kids, skinny kids, kids who climb on rocks.

You’ve got your thing, and I get that, but I’ve been fighting for everyone. I may not have the brute presence of BLM in NYC, but that’s no reason not to master those resources for the good of all.

Vaccine passports are not “racism” unless only one race is required to have them. But it is discrimination, and this might offer a taste of something many could never understand otherwise. How you say you feel living in this culture or this place.

Most of the white allies who marched with BLM in the summer of 2020 were pandering little douchebags. They were there to “be seen,” but at no point could they ever understand your position. Vaccine passports may not make them part of the black experience, but the absence creates a discriminatory experience that seems arbitrary and capricious.

Given what we know, they are.

Beating up hostesses is not going to win you any support. Rioting will not either, quite the opposite. But protesting vaccine passports will get you a lot of help from many corners because they are in your corner on this issue.

Not everything is a nail, and you are not a hammer. That said, build a bridge instead of burning one down and see if that helps.

| LI




The post BLM: Vaccine Passports Are Racist appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Awe, A Certain Tuftonboro Teacher (Brian Bloomer) did have the Sads yesterday.

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 19:30 +0000

But we will never know what happened to the Progressive dude who brought this unto himself.  Only way we’ll know is to keep checking SAU46’s roster to see if his name is still on it.

Steve broke the story that Brian Bloomer, a fifth grade teacher at the Tuftonboro Central School, decided to go on a rant against those that disagree with them – expletives included. Fine – if that’s what he wants to do, do so, but it also gave Steve another opportunity to show what the real statistics are on the WuFlu pandemic (which, in many cases, has been more about who gets to wield Power than Public Health). I simply decided to ask the School District Administrative Unit 46 (SAU46):

What action(s) will be taken by the District by this potty-mouthed teacher in your school system?  What is your official response to his rant against those that simply have a different political worldview than his?…

Well, I did hear back from the SAU46 Superintendent:

Sidenote: I never emailed her. I DID email the entire School Board.  I thought that I would have heard from the Chair but no such luck.  WHY do School Boards use their Supers as “hatchet men” instead of having the courage and sense of responsibility to do it themselves?

—— Original Message ——
From: “Kathleen Cuddy-Egbert” <>
To: “Skip” <>
Sent: 9/20/2021 5:09:39 PM
Subject: Re: Brian Bloomer

Hi Skip,

I am sorry I cannot comment. This has become a personnel matter.


Kathleen Cuddy-Egbert
Superintendent of Schools
Governor Wentworth Regional School District
PO Box 190/140 Pine Hill Rd.
Wolfeboro Falls, NH 03896
p:  603-569-1658  f: 603-569-6983

Thus, with that six word sentence, that’s the end of it. Unless some parent that has a child in that class steps forward (even anonymously), we’ll never know. With that said, IF you are such a parent, even one with just a kid in that school, we’d love to know more even if it is just his absence from the building.  We can’t be everywhere so we have to rely on you folks!

The post Awe, A Certain Tuftonboro Teacher (Brian Bloomer) did have the Sads yesterday. appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

How to Avoid a Primary Challenge if you are a RINO.

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 18:00 +0000

Everyone knows or should know, that there is neither a loyalty oath nor an accurate FDA-approved blood test (sorry Dr. Fauci) to verify that someone is actually a real Republican. There ought to be but there just isn’t.

All that is required to run for office in New Hampshire as a Republican is to show up in your town clerk’s office, fill out a declaration of candidacy, and on that declaration state that you are a Republican. Of course, the town clerk is supposed to check the voter checklist to verify your registration status, but you can easily change your status from one party to another or from undeclared to a party, and back again, at almost any time.

And there you have it!

Unless the electorate takes the time and effort to question a candidate and their political views, most voters assume that if they vote for a candidate carrying the Republican label they must be a Republican and if elected they will vote like a Republican. Not necessarily true.

We in New Hampshire have seen time and time again people elected as Republicans who vote as Democrats (or worse) once they get into office. These are the political figures who become labeled as Republicans In Name Only (i.e. RINO’s for short).

This writer has historically argued that if a person runs as a Republican, they should act like a real Republican, which means, generally, that they support the US and NH constitutions as written and the platforms of the Republican National Committee and the Republican Party of New Hampshire.

Obviously, there may be some aspects of the platforms of the national and state party with whom one may not agree completely, keeping in mind that the platforms have been written by a committee. Of course, a camel is well known to be a horse designed by a committee. So, if you do not agree with 100% of the party platform, pick a percentage with which you do agree – 60%; 75%; 80%; 90%?

If a candidate agrees with less than, say, 60% of the material positions in the party platform, it is suggested that they are in the wrong party and should change their party registration.

In recent days, we have seen an individual elected as a state representative as a Republican, but who usually supported Dem position and voted like a Dem, finally changed his party registration to Dem, showing his true colors. This “courageous” act turned out to be a welcome way for him to avoid a primary since he was at the top of many lists of RINOs in the General Court and the Executive Council to be targeted in primaries.

So, the message is clear: If you are actually a RINO and often vote with the Dems on critical platform issues, avoid the time, expense, and trouble of having to face a primary opponent who may be more ideologically pure by changing your party registration and running under the banner of the political party in which you actually believe and support.

And it isn’t the Republican Party.



The post How to Avoid a Primary Challenge if you are a RINO. appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Fake Derry “republican” Neil Wetherbee Endorsed Pete Buttigieg for President for 2020

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 16:30 +0000

As reported previously, Neil Wetherbee of Derry is a fake Republican. He is a Democrat who has registered as a Republican to run in a Republican Primary. And he’s not a moderate aisle crosser either. This guy supported Bernie in 2016 and Pete Buttigieg in 2020.


Democrat Neil Wetherbee Endorses Pete Buttigieg


More impact! says John DiStaso. An actual journalist. What sort of impact was Neil hoping to make?

Let’s review Mayor Pete’s platform and see what made him so damn dreamy to Neil Wetherbee.

  • Government-run healthcare
  • Open borders (DACA)
  • Climate Change (green new deal style)
  • Supports court-packing
  • All abortion (he opposed pro-life pregnancy care centers as Mayor Pete)
  • Eliminate the electoral college
  • He’s not pro-gun, and that’s an understatement.
  • Massive infrastructure spending (more debt, bailouts to donors, payback to unions, and cronies with your money).

That’s the shortlist and not exactly a bucket list even for your typical moderate/RINO.  Like, say, Bill Weld.

Bill Weld was running for President in 2020 as a Republican, but Neil didn’t endorse him. Weld is about as not Republican as you can be. If Neil was truly a closet aisle crossing, Never-Trumper Weld is far more indicative of that perception.

Neil picked Pete Buttigieg. Why not Bill? Because Neil is a Democrat, and this Bernie Supporter was pandering to a younger version of Sanders.

Just another anti-Republican, on the far left.

Not moderate. Not independent. Not Undeclared. Not even Bill Weld. We’re talking left of Nancy Pelosi.

And we are meant to believe that after a Democrat wave election, this Bernie and Buttigieg supporter suddenly wants to be a Republican? A pro-abortion, climate fearmongering, no Federalism, anti-gun, open-birders Republican?

No. Wetherbee has name recognition in town after years of being on councils and committees. Democrats (with some whiney RINO cover)  think they can steal the seat by running him as a Republican.

If he wins the “Republican Primary,” Derry voters get to choose between a Democrat registered as a Republican and a Democrat registered as a Democrat.

Neither will represent Derry which is an R+4 Republican town.

Please do not Vote for Neil Wetherbee in the primary, and do not let your Republican friends and neighbors vote for him either. But please vote. The Dems are working hard to steal the seat even if they have to use a pretend Republican to do it.

The post Fake Derry “republican” Neil Wetherbee Endorsed Pete Buttigieg for President for 2020 appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Extending The Logic Of No Vax, No Service

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 15:00 +0000

Leftists want to ruin Americans’ lives for not conforming to Covid fear porn or complying with vaccine mandates. No effort has been made to convince us Covid is scary or the vaccine is worthwhile; instead, they lie to us with cheap statistical tricks and admonish us with thinning patience.

For the record, I believe with as much certainty as a casual keyboard warrior can that the issue of a viral pandemic would be near extinction if we had done nothing. Between a 99.98% survival rate for Americans under 50 and the availability of cheap therapeutic remedies, there was no reason to pretend the sky was falling.

In retrospect, it seems that most of what we know in September of 2021 was also known around April of 2020 but was intentionally disregarded and blasphemed to sell anxiety, panic, hysteria, and fear.

And vaccines. They wanted to sell lots and lots of vaccines.

If not for the political shenanigans and deceit, I might be more benevolent with my analysis of the vaccine. It is a modern medical miracle to have developed something so quickly. Unfortunately, it is also a monumental liability considering it went from production to injection with little known about its long-term consequences. On top of the thousands of VAERS entries, hopefully, waning efficacy will be the worst issue among the rest of the sizable trial group.

Related: No, The Mandate Is Not About “Protecting Myself”

One of the major battles in this upcoming autumn and winter will be the fight for individual liberties. The discussion around vaccination is no longer  – if it ever truly was (and I don’t believe so) – about protection and saving lives. It is available, and those that want it can get it.

Though I refused to bow down to illogical tyranny and lived my life as normal as ever, as a nation, we unnecessarily sacrificed eighteen months of small business sustainability, social events, family gatherings, formative years for young people, and overall sanity in the apparent wait for a vaccine. The vaccine’s arrival has now come and gone. If you want it, you can get it. If you don’t want it, then you won’t get it. Each group can weigh the risks and rewards of their decisions and live with the consequences.

Yet here we are, living among people more frightened than ever of a virus from which they’ve never been more protected. For one thing, the natural evolution of a virus is to become more infectious but less lethal over time (both common sense and evolutionary theory support this).

For another, the most panicked people have had all of the recommended doses of lab juice. They also wear masks as if they were infantile blankies. It is truly bizarre, and an honest history in future years will rightfully call out these fools for the dangerous nincompoops they are.

They are dull and dim-witted, no doubt, and therefore also dangerous. They threaten me much more than Covid. As it currently stands, I am at risk – though I have complete natural immunity (even then, who cares if you don’t have any) – of losing fundamental rights and privileges because of these indoctrinated leftist tools.

Because I refuse to get the injection, there is talk of excluding me from social events, public establishments, travel, and even medical treatment. Some of this is already happening in various locales and cities around the nation. Does this make any sense? Have we ever done anything like this before? What if this logic were extended elsewhere?

Should urgent care clinics refuse to treat daycare kids for RSV? These kids are in known super-spreader facilities.

Should hospitals decline to treat smokers for lung cancer? These patients are knowingly inhaling carcinogenic toxins.

Should emergency rooms turn away the morbidly obese after suffering from a heart attack? These patients enabled a condition to intensify with poor diet and lack of exercise.

Should schools deny remediation to kindergarten students demonstrating low literacy skills? These kids should have grown up in households that valued proper grammar, books, and conversations.

Should the police turn away from a residence dealing with domestic abuse if they have visited the same address before? These women presumably had a chance to leave the aggressor upon the initial offense.

From both a medical and logical standpoint, none of the penalties for refusing the vaccine make sense. Then again, nothing about Covid has been handled by the ruling class based on a medical standpoint and logical standpoint. It’s about par for the course for elitists despots.


Reposted with permission. If you’d like to read more from Parker Beauregard, please visit The Blue State Conservative.

Editors Note: Reformatted from the original and includes a different featured image.

The post Extending The Logic Of No Vax, No Service appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

FDA Panel Votes 16-2 Against COVID Booster Shots Except for Those Over 65 and …

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 13:30 +0000

After the 8-hour hearing, parts of which we’ve shared here and here, the FDA panel voted overwhelmingly against COVID booster shots except in high-risk patients and those over 65 years of age.

By a vote of 16-2, the panel rejected approving boosters for anyone over 16-years of age. But a second vote (18-0) approved them for those 65 and older or anyone regarded as high risk.

That’s an interesting way to put that. After all the research and scientific commentary, we’ve shared people who received the vaccine are already at high risk from the vaccine.

Note: “[T]he FDA committee of outside experts agreed that an EUA for older adults or those at risk of severe disease had benefits that outweighed any risks of a booster.”

That’s the reporting from the American Journal of Managed Care.

The benefits outweighed the risks in older adults and those at severe risk. But not anyone else.

The Advisory Panel recommendations can be ignored by the Government.

Given recent revelations from Federal Whistleblower Jodi O’Malley, I wonder if they will rethink jumping another shark and ignoring the panel’s guidance?

Another thought I had: is there a redline? Can we envision a point at which the political damage to the Democrat party appears significant enough that they do what all despotic regimes must in times of trouble? Cut their losses and hand the people a few scalps.

It is one of the features of such regimes upon which we comment often. Typically, we see it in cases like those of Tara Reade. Tara is a lifelong Democrat and former staffer to then Sen. Joe Biden, who raped her. He literally grabbed her by the “pu**y.” That revelation turned her into a pariah and object of scorn, and she got the total hate, smear treatment.

Related: “In Some Elitist Circles Being Pro-Trump Has Caused Me More Grief Than Carrying the Name Bin Ladin.”

If this COVID vaxx adverse reactions thing manages to break over the left’s media seawall, will they pick a few folks like Fauci and theoretically hang them out to dry?

Does Fauci or any of the insiders know or suspect that might be how their careers end?

Most rank-and-file democrats don’t suspect or even see it coming, but they are but a tiny misstep away from being tossed under the bus by their own party.

It’s tragic and sad, but intolerant masters can brook no dissent. And when things go sideways, someone else has to take the fall. Just ask Andy Cuomo – who followed the ruling class guidance, and when it killed thousands of seniors, they murdered his career to hide the problem.

Democrats don’t care about sexual harassment; just ask female Democrats who work for Democrat men. Ask Monica Lewinski.

Sure, they’ll make you take classes, but that’s just window dressing. Whistleblowers like Reade get torched unless they are sought out by the party to cover up something else.

And these vaccines and this plan are killing thousands. If that were to get widely reported and often as we’ve asked of all media in New Hampshire, the narrative landscape would be very different.

Our approach to treatment options would change.

People can and do survive and thrive without The Jab. There is almost literally no good reason to mandate it or even recommend it. But the only force these creatures understand is that which damages either their legacy or their future.

Not much else matters.

Not even the rising body count caused by a treatment they continue to promote. Unless it gains escape velocity, at which point the Dem machine will need to find a few more Cuomo’s.

The post FDA Panel Votes 16-2 Against COVID Booster Shots Except for Those Over 65 and … appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

NH Nurse “Wins” Meet and Greet with the Governor – They Won’t Let Her In

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 12:00 +0000

From Rumble: “Terese Grinnell won 4 tickets to Fisher Cat Baseball stadium in Manchester. It was part of a meet and greet with the tyrant in charge, Sununu. Yet, she was kept from entering the stadium under the irrational fear that she was there “to protest.”

Terese Grinnell is a nurse at Concord Regional Hospital.

Here’s the video labeled “Nurse Terese Denied Entry to Fisher Cat Stadium to Meet With Sununu! Part I”


!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=""+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

Rumble("play", {"video":"vk2osu","div":"rumble_vk2osu"});


The post NH Nurse “Wins” Meet and Greet with the Governor – They Won’t Let Her In appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Project Veritas: Covid19 Vaccine Exposed Part 1 – “The Government Doesn’t Want to Show the COVID Vaccine Is Full of SH!T.”

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 10:30 +0000

James O’Keefe and Project Veritas have dropped part one of a series called COVID19 Exposed. Fun times. It starts with a surgeon, a Federal Employee, saying, ‘The government doesn’t want to show the COVID vaccine is full of sh!t.”

People are being harmed, but because the VAERS reporting takes so long to complete, many health professionals (it appears) are not bothering to do it. The CDC requires it, but no one enforces that.

In the undercover video, doctors and nurses working directly for HHS discuss these issues, and it is, to use a hackneyed phrase, explosive.


And the Feds are not warning people off. They are pushing hard to get more people to take The Jab.

AS WE’VE LONG SUSPECTED, the VAERS numbers that we have are but a fraction of the harms, including deaths resulting from this inoculation plan.


Here’s Part 1 on Twitter (embedded below so Twittler can’t take it away). You can visit Project Veritas here.

View on GAB TV here.


The post Project Veritas: Covid19 Vaccine Exposed Part 1 – “The Government Doesn’t Want to Show the COVID Vaccine Is Full of SH!T.” appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Nitecap – ‘Grok Still on Top in Alexa Ranking (But we Have a New Number Two!)

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 03:00 +0000

Before the pandemic – Before Pandemic (BP), Before COVID (BC), what many of us referred to as BS, I attended a presentation by AFP with the proprietor of Liberty Block NH. Elliot Axelman. I said something then that has come to pass.

I thought it would be awesome if Grok and Liberty Block NH were number one and two in the Alexa ranking updates I occasionally share, and today, they are. and LibertyBlock NH are the top two digital print media operations in our survey of online NH media.

The Union Leader, a print newspaper with an online presence, has been bumped to third place.

For the sake of clarity, we will need a few months of data to see if this sticks. The numbers from last month moved a lot and not just for Elliott’s online footprint. I hope it does, but there were some strange changes and giant leaps in both directions.

I see no new changes to how they collect data, and typically when we see these sorts of jumps, they balance out in successive months. Fingers crossed for Elliot as we move into the fall and winter when people stuck indoors are more likely to spend time online. With any luck, he’ll still be there come springtime.

Liberty Block has, in the past, spent several months at number four and number three on our survey, so that makes for promising news regarding their jump to number two.

It’s what the UL and Foster,s and the Monitor, and the rest deserve.

As always, sites are sorted by US rank unless they have none – then by Global ranking.


Alexa Global Web Ranking
Site Name (Sorted by US Rank) US Rank Global Rank
GraniteGrok 13,218 68,710
Liberty Block 18,720 125,245
Union leader 33,063 108,556
Fosters Daily Democrat 51,161 207,840
Concord Monitor 57,897 209,253
Lowell Sun 62,070 215,322
Lawrence Eagle-Tribune 62,438 291401
SeacoastOnline 68,711 130,920
NHPR 77,061 205,194
Manchester Ink Link 106,678 392113
Keene Sentinel 115,616 265,762
NH Business Review (NHBR) 137,767 479517
Conway/Berlin Daily Sun 153,208 569501
The Valley News 153,689 386,924
Girard at Large 168,020 511303
NH Journal no data 630373
Monadnock Ledger-Transcript no data 840651
Seacoast no data 883,164
In-depth NH no data 901,002
Nashua Telegraph no data 1,026,642
Free Keene no data 1,197,386
J no data 1,399,964
Business NH no data 1,403,377
GraniteCrock no data 4,151,329

The post Nitecap – ‘Grok Still on Top in Alexa Ranking (But we Have a New Number Two!) appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Was Donald Trump’s Vaccine Push a Countermeasure to the Great Reset?

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 01:30 +0000

There seems to have been a significant amount of Trump voters who questioned Trump’s Operation Warpspeed, and rightfully so. An avid Trump supporter myself, I went through a couple-month phase at the beginning of 2021, where I questioned why he would push the vaccines despite the big pharma and central banking industries profiting from the china virus.

Donald Trump was and still is a Godsend. I know he is a human, and like all of us, humans are not perfect, and would often tell myself maybe this was one of these rare times he made a bad judgment call.

As I continued to tune into some truth seeker and patriot independent podcasts, daily videos, etc (an example being the X22 Report) and listened to the critical and tactical analysis of some of their thoughts on this matter, I decided to not settle with my own premature decision on Trump’s Operation Warpspeed. Instead, I kept my skeptical thoughts in the back of my head and told myself the hints and answers will reveal themselves over time.

Fast forward to the late spring and summer of 2021. The grassroots activism pushing back against the vaccine mandates and passport mandates worldwide combined with the cyber patriots behind the scenes leaking out pieces of vital information on the vaccine industry and their inner working their global counterparts, Trump’s vaccine push starts to make sense from a very deep, strategic vantage point.

We want to thank Ryan Bennett for this Op-Ed. If you have an Op-Ed or LTE
you would like us to consider, please submit it to

In my opinion, Trump had two choices in 2020. Either allow the economy to stay locked down for years while the pharmaceutical companies “develop, test and approve” a COVID vaccine or fast-track the vaccine supply distribution.

At face value, the better scenario does not seem good in absolute terms. However, given the information about the Great Reset Trump knew about and was warned about, in my opinion, he did a comparative analysis between both choices: counter with a vaccine or allow worldwide lockdowns to endure for a year, the latter which would set the ground work for a slower vaccine creation cycle to justify FDA approval.

Perhaps this is what he meant when he has referenced being at war with the silent enemy?

Please see an open letter written to Trump in 2020 by the Archbishop of Ulpania, warning Trump of the Great Reseat Plan to enslave humanity under the auspices of a public health emergency derived from “COVID.”

As a result of fast-tracking the different COVID vaccines, they were promoted under an Emergency Use Authorization status. This makes it much easier for patriots and concerned people on the fence to fight unconstitutional vaccine mandates (regardless of any level of government or corporate institution).

The fast-tracking of any vaccine that has not been allowed to go through the academic research, pre-clinical, various phase trials, and proper safety measures for the building of its factories and manufacturing, constitute them as experimental, which violates the Nuremberg Code and Helsinki Declaration, as well as US Federal statutes here.

If Donald Trump would have decided to keep the economy closed and the global cabal players to go unchallenged with the Great Reset, the craziness that the world has experienced now likely would have been astronomically worse by now. We still have many battles ahead of us with the vaccine mandates and in some countries, with the vaccine passports, and the plethora of health-related draconian measures, yet despite all this, this pales in comparison to the asserted levels of carnage and destruction that would have occurred from years of hardcore lockdown.

Think about higher levels of domestic violence, abuse, drugs, higher unemployment, lack of socializing with family and friends, a range of severe psychological disorders, etc.

Furthermore, the global alliance of nation-states, big tech/media companies, big pharma, supranational organizations such as the World Economic Forum and International Monetary Fund all support massive vaccine distribution. They all viewed the pandemic as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to accelerate their Great Reset goal to usher in the global socialist order. In this order, civil liberties are curtailed under the auspice of public health measures, engineered by propaganda, and the government is seen as the savior of people from a bad economic and medical crisis.

Trump countered the Great Reset with the vaccine while simultaneously bringing to light therapeutics that also worked and the Deep State’s vicious censoring of medical professionals who spoke favorably of HCQ and Ivermectin.

He also encouraged patriots of many backgrounds to challenge medical tyranny through Constitutional and peaceful forms of civil redress and empowering people to think for themselves and break free from the chains of indoctrination and propaganda.

Trumps’ decision allowed the existing legal foundation to be used by courageous people of many backgrounds to stand up and expose the medical deceit, dangerous protocols, and abuse of government and corporate power against citizens of all countries. Since the vaccine was so connected to the globalist order, Trumps’ unpredicted launch of Operation Warpspeed on his time and not the cabal’s, started a process that unravels parts of the globalist framework the vaccine is injected into.

Since the lockdowns, vaccine mandates, mask mandates, suspension of civil liberties for unvaccinated are being challenged, all of which the globalists did not anticipate with the issuance of the vaccine, their narrative is falling apart and people are starting to see through it.

Is it possible Donald Trump had a deep, ulterior motive to pushing the vaccine? Is it possible that he is allowing the medical-technocratic oligarch psychopaths to hang themselves in a real-time operation?

This is not to negate the dangers of untested vaccines. I am simply trying to think from a 40,000-foot elevation status to think of the big picture. Trump has mentioned in the past before, that we are at war with a silent enemy. Never interrupt an enemy while they are destroying themselves. Time will tell what the truth is. Draw your own conclusions.

The post Was Donald Trump’s Vaccine Push a Countermeasure to the Great Reset? appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Monday Memes

Granite Grok - Tue, 2021-09-21 00:00 +0000

This may become a tradition – based on the comments.  Please let me know.

Remember Alinsky and his rules – particularly Rule 5: “Ridicule is Man’s Most Potent Weapon”.

LAUGH at these people.  MOCK THEM MERCILESSLY.  And if you recall from that video embedded here about mass psychosis and propagandizing, ridicule is also an effective weapon against that as well.

Currently trying to polish up the ending of an essay – not happy with what I have.  Also in the works, another Quick Takes, a few essays in various stages of developing, and waiting for the cartoonist to complete my latest cartoon idea.

And, begging our hosts’ pardon, but they did say it was OK (with an implicit understanding that I not do this too often), please consider supporting me with a purchase of a bumper sticker:


Or my favorite cartoon design as a T-shirt:



And if I see a person actually wearing these around, I will personally hand them a five-spot.


Language alert in one or two… and now let the meme mockery commence.


The post Monday Memes appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Why Progressives Should Support Peaceful Separation

The Liberty Block - Mon, 2021-09-20 23:27 +0000

Now that talk about peaceful separation is becoming increasingly mainstream, we’d like to take a look at why progressive left-leaning individuals may support such a movement. Typically, people believe that state independence is a purely right-wing phenomenon. However, progressive states are actually leading the way when it comes to reclaiming state sovereignty from DC.

According to federal law, cannabis is currently a schedule-1 controlled substance, which is the highest level of prohibition on any substance that the US government has. Stated another way, nothing is more harmful, dangerous, and addictive than cannabis, according to DC politicians. Federal law includes a 1-3 year prison sentence for anyone caught with any amount of cannabis. Selling large amounts of cannabis could result in life in prison, according to current federal law. In response to the insanity of DC politicians, progressive states from California to New York have ‘nullified’ federal law by simply passing legislation to tell all their law enforcement officials to ignore the federal laws that contradict the progressive values held by the citizens in the state. 

Similarly, progressive states all over the union have nullified federal immigration law. Many individuals and legislators on the left side of the spectrum believe that the immigration policies and enforcement controlled by DC politicians violate their values. So, they have nullified federal immigration law by passing legislation to become sanctuary states. 

The problem? 

At any moment, DC politicians can step up their enforcement and/or begin to punish states that flout their laws. The federal government takes billions of dollars from taxpayers in progressive states each year. They send some of that money back to the state governments, but only as long as they obey the wishes of DC elites. If the US government decides to stop sending that money back to any state that does not obey federal cannabis and immigration law to a tee, life would change drastically for around 50 million progressives overnight. 

Additional issues that might be of concern to progressives include the extreme prohibition of abortion that the Supreme Court of the US government recently refused to block, federal politicians rolling back gun control, and the elimination of democratic voting rights measures, and the passing of voter ID laws. 

What could be done to prevent this disaster? 

Progressives who are concerned about the conflicting ideologies between DC politicians and their own state legislatures may want to consider peaceful separation from DC before matters make such a separation difficult or impossible. 

The post Why Progressives Should Support Peaceful Separation appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Is Capitalism Evil?

Granite Grok - Mon, 2021-09-20 22:30 +0000

The cover page of the July 4th Union Leader read, “Poetry Returns with a Slam,” headlining the return of Slam Free or Die, a poetry club that had not met in person since the beginning of the COVID lockdowns.

The adjacent picture featured two young lyricists reciting their poetry from smartphones, with one of the pair wearing an “Anti-Capitalism Social Club” t-shirt.

Is slam poetry a hobby in communist countries? I cannot claim to know, but if it is, I am certain that its adherents are not reading their oeuvre off iPhones.

In that same vein, at the 2019 South by Southwest Festival, New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez stated that “Capitalism is an ideology of capital – the most important thing is the concentration of capital and to seek and maximize profit…so to me capitalism is irredeemable.”

We want to thank Richard Malaby for this Op-Ed. If you have an Op-Ed or LTE
you would like us to consider, please submit it to

South by Southwest, or SXSW as it’s popularly stylized, is a massive film, tech, and music conference held annually in Austin, Texas. If I had to guess, I would assume that countries with centrally-planned economies do not hold week-long festivals celebrating the convergence of art and technology. Without capitalism – that is, a free enterprise system that allows individuals to develop their own talents and to benefit materially by serving others – these pastimes simply would not exist.

So why is it that capitalism is often condemned as a system of exploitation, of leading to gross inequality, of being immoral? Is capitalism really evil?

There is an old joke about two economists passing one another on the street. The first says, “Hello, how is your wife?” The second replies, “Compared to what?”

The politicians and pundits who have gained the most from a free enterprise system enjoy bashing capitalism for political clout, but they never stop to compare what we have in America to state-run economies.

When Boris Yeltsin visited a Houston grocer in 1989, he believed initially that our government had set up a Potemkin store. “Even the Politburo doesn’t have this choice. Not even Mr. Gorbachev,” he whispered to his entourage, and that if the Soviets, who had to wait in lines for meager goods were to see a supermarket, “there would be a revolution.”

Behind the Iron Curtain, Soviets were told that Americans were starving, yet their shelves were always bare. Writing later in his autobiography, Yeltsin confessed, “When I saw those shelves crammed with hundreds, thousands of cans, cartons, and goods of every possible sort, for the first time I felt quite frankly sick with despair for the Soviet people;” and, “that such a potentially super-rich country as ours has been brought to a state of such poverty! It is terrible to think of it.”

Yeltsin wasn’t the only Soviet impressed by everyday American affluence. Lantana Fetisov, the wife of NHL defensemen Viacheslav Fetisov, was asked to compare the United States with Russia; she stated that “America is a wonderful place; you have fifteen brands of mayonnaise.”

A 2017 study found that three-quarters of Venezuelan adults had lost an average of 19 pounds over the prior year as a result of food shortages due to hyperinflation and price controls.

Perhaps the starkest example of the difference between capitalism and state control of the economy is a nighttime view of the Korean Peninsula, where South Korea enjoys a first-world electrical grid providing light to residences and industry at all hours, but North Korea seems to disappear in darkness into the Yellow Sea.

Call it Communism, Marxism, Socialism – all these terms boil down to state control of the economy, which leads to massive inefficiency, shortages, and poverty. Yet, these “isms” are en vogue precisely because they are defined by their objective rather than the reality. These utopian theories promise their citizens necessities but cannot clear that most basic hurdle, whereas capitalism promises its citizens nothing, yet for those willing to work by serving others, it delivers unfathomable affluence.

Prior to the free market, the way people accumulated wealth was theft, be it goods or labor. In a free market, wealth is created by individuals willing to help others – to deliver services of higher quality at a lower cost. Consider how many politicians are too happy to verbally assault Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, or Bill Gates, but would those folks prefer to live in a world without Amazon, iPhones, or computers?

Did these ultra-wealthy men take from the poor in order to amass their riches, or did they provide goods for a price consumers were willing to pay?

Perhaps the most misunderstood concept in today’s political discourse, one of the main reasons the free market is vilified, is profit. Capitalism is portrayed as evil or immoral because, as the story goes, fat-cat business owners want to make as much money as possible by gouging prices and exploiting the little guy.

Profit being nothing more than an additional cost is the Marxist definition of the term, and that understanding is totally inverted in practice. In reality, a profit is a difference between what it costs a business to produce a product and what a consumer is willing to pay for it. To claim that profit is an additional cost that a business simply tacks on to their product is to completely ignore the voluntary action of the consumer.

For instance, a farmer can attempt to sell his milk for a hundred dollars a gallon, which would be a fabulous “get rich quick” plan if there were anyone foolish enough to pay him that hundred dollars. If his customers are only willing to pay up to, say, six dollars a gallon for his farm-fresh milk, it would behoove our farmer to produce his product as inexpensively as possible to maximize his profit.

He may find that not many people buy milk at that price, but plenty will at five dollars a gallon; our farmer may make a smaller profit by selling milk at the lower price, but assuming he is one of these greedy businessmen we hear so much about, his incentive is to either sell more milk at this lower price point or to produce the milk for a lower cost.

Keep the higher price, and his potential customers may opt to buy Darigold, Garelick, Hood, Lucerne, Organic Valley, or any of the dozens of other brands. Either way, the consumer wins.

In state-run economies, that incentive to be as efficient as possible does not exist; when production costs rise, prices rise, and there is no reason to control costs as there is no competition. When there is no profit motive, there is no incentive to create goods and services. These issues lead to scarcity.

In a capitalist country, creating products such as cars, dishwashers, televisions, toilets, vacuums, and washing machines, products which improve the consumers’ quality of life, and then making them as inexpensively as possible so they are accessible to the greatest number of people, is the way to “get rich quick.”

Socialism would be a wonderful system if men were angels, but we are not. In the real world, people respond to incentives. That is the fundamental disagreement in the debate between capitalism vs communism: knowledge.

In a state-run economy, the central planners can make the decisions, but they do not have anywhere near the knowledge necessary to run an economy. Likewise, the people living in a centrally planned economy have the knowledge to produce for themselves, but they are not allowed to choose what to produce.

State planning requires coercion. In contrast, the free market allows citizens to make their own choices, leading to the creation of wealth. Our political class may bash the free market system, but consider the poverty found around the world in Latin America, in the Middle East, in parts of Asia, and compare that with the relatively unfathomable affluence of even poor Americans.

Far from being evil, the free market and the profit motive are the greatest economic forces for good the world has ever known, whether it be the creation of energy, the development of technology, or the sale of goods from smartphones and laptops to milk and mayonnaise.

The post Is Capitalism Evil? appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

REPEAT AFTER ME: The COVID Vaccines Have Always Been About Just Preventing Bad Outcomes

Granite Grok - Mon, 2021-09-20 21:00 +0000

Check this out. SHOT: Chris Rock telling people he has COVID and to get vaccinated. CHASER: He was “vaccinated.”

And 5.2 million people “follow” this FOOL on twitter. And the comments from this fool’s brainwashed followers are appallingly ignorant. For example, that vaccines aren’t supposed to protect you from getting infected, only from dying or getting hospitalized … which would mean the COVID vaccines aren’t vaccines in the sense we have always understood vaccines, but merely therapeutics. In other words, they don’t even know what a vaccine is … or worse, they do, but gladly accept the Biden-regime’s redefinition.

Moreover, it is total conjecture to say that the COVID vaccines … which we were told were true vaccines and prevented infection, until it became apparent that they did not … prevent worse outcomes. In other words, it is blind faith … whatever the regime tells you is true. Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia.

The post REPEAT AFTER ME: The COVID Vaccines Have Always Been About Just Preventing Bad Outcomes appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Bernie Supporter Neil Wetherbee Running as a Republican in a NH House Special Election

Granite Grok - Mon, 2021-09-20 19:30 +0000

The Democrats and RINOs in Derry are running a Bernie Sanders Supporter in the upcoming New Hampshire House Special Election. Neil Wetherbee has changed his party affiliation and is running as a Republican.

Local Democrats were encouraged to register as independents so that they could vote for him in the Republican primary to tip the election.

It has several Republicans running, so it is likely that the Democrat, Wetherbee, could win the Republican primary with the vote split. That would leave Derry with two general, Special-Election Candidates, who would rather see a Democrat governor (or President) or in any other office than a Republican.

That’s their idea of choice. In an R+4 town, you steal the primary, and then you can’t lose. Steal it and rob actual Derry Republicans of a voice.

Wait, Steve, how do you know Neil is a Democrat?

I’m sure you saw the featured image, so here’s the rest of the screengrab.

Related: Special Election: Is There a “Democrat” Snake in This Republican Primary? – Granite Grok




But, you say, that was 2016. Neil could have had a come to Trump or Republican moment. Yeah, sure. Okay, let’s check with his wife, Wendy Wetherbee.



He’s not a Republican. He is just registered as one. That also suggests that Wendy is or has changed her party to Independent, or she could not possibly vote for him as a registered Democrat.

I did not dig into their registration history, but I feel confident at what I’ll find (and know someone else will and will send it to me – please?)

There’s a lot more of this. We have received extensive screen grabs of social media interactions that lead us to conclude these two things. Neil is a Democrat plant and has not converted to the Republican Party. And Mark Connors and Jim Morgan are coordinating a massive head-fake by convincing voters to register as independents who can then vote for the Democrat Wetherbee in the Republican Primary.

There is also an active smear campaign against actual Republicans to move votes to Wetherbee. Please don’t fall for it. And if you need more encouragement, Neil – like many nasty, awful leftists, could not retrain themselves when Rush Limbaugh passed away.


His wife (who can’t bring herself to vote for her Democrat husband registered as a Republican) was quite pleased.

Derry, you need to kick this fraud out of the Republican primary and back to his own party.



The post Bernie Supporter Neil Wetherbee Running as a Republican in a NH House Special Election appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

The Designer of AOC’s ‘Tax the Rich’ Dress is a “Notorious Tax Deadbeat”

Granite Grok - Mon, 2021-09-20 18:00 +0000

Sandy Cortez set tongues wagging when she showed up at the exclusive $30,000.00 per ticket MET gala in a “Tax the Rich” dress. But that’s not all she did. The woman who designed it has been exposed as a deadbeat who doesn’t do her Patriotic Duty and pays her taxes.


The Post found tax records showing IRS tax liens totaling $103,220 in the parent company of her fashion brand. There are also “three open warrants in New York State for failing to withhold $14,798 in income taxes from employee paychecks (plus twelve other since-resolved NY tax warrants), and a $17,000 fine for failing to carry worker’s compensation insurance,” writes Mediate.

Mediate continues, “She’s also a rent deadbeat, the Post claims, describing an eviction action by James’ previous landlord – along with a demand for more than $25,000 plus interest for staying beyond her lease. The case was settled for an undisclosed amount.”


She’s also allegedly a bad boss. Reports suggest she harrases her staff and runs a sweat shop-like environment in which she abuses an endless stream of interns.

Who better to make a dress for Socialist Alexandria Ocasio Cortez than a woman who doesn’t pay her bills or her employees. A dress for a woman who used to cry poor but can drop $30,000.00 on a ticket to a fundraiser for the New York elite while pretending to look out for the interests of the little people her designer abuses.

It’s the perfect little Marxist fairy tale.

The post The Designer of AOC’s ‘Tax the Rich’ Dress is a “Notorious Tax Deadbeat” appeared first on Granite Grok.

Categories: Blogs, New Hampshire

Major YouTuber Tim Pool Covers NH Independence News, Predicts US Breakup

NHexit.US - Fri, 2021-09-17 22:07 +0000

Tim Pool is a self-described centrist who favors freedom. He also has over 1.2 subscribers on his YouTube channel. Earlier today, he posted this video where he discusses the inevitable breakup of the United States and specifically brings up the proposed constitutional amendment to allow New Hampshire to peacefully exit the US. He also covers leftist and NH-native Sarah Silverman’s recent statement supporting a divorce between the various states:


Peaceful Separation Now Endorsed By Progressives, Centrists, Conservatives, & Libertarians

The Liberty Block - Fri, 2021-09-17 17:19 +0000

With Sarah Silverman announcing to her 12 million Twitter followers that the united states must split up, the progressives appear to be coalescing around the idea of a national divorce. Tim Pool, one of the largest independent media personalities in the world has also come out in strong support for secession. Many conservatives and even more libertarians and voluntaryists have supported the idea of balkanization for a while. 

On September 12th, actress and comedian, Sarah Silverman, posted a video to her Twitter explaining that the union is not working and should be split up. “…if people aren’t getting along, like in a relationship, they break up…..why don’t we finally realize that these states aren’t working, and like divide up into two or three countries.”, Silverman said. The comments on her post are overwhelmingly supportive of a national divorce. Make no mistake; I almost never agree with the radical leftist who hates conservatives and libertarians – and that is my exact point. We need to break up. Silverman joins a growing group of progressive Democrats who want to secede, including the Calexit movement.

When a leftist author with a blue check on Twitter announced that he’s praying for COVID to kill Laura Loomer because she is a conservative, Tim Pool, an independent centrist journalist with nearly a million followers retweeted him, adding that “at this point, divorce seems the only reasonable solution. When a married couple begins praying for the other to die maybe it’s time to just peacefully walk away.”

Eric July and Michael Malice are among the many prominent figures calling for secession increasingly often. 

A few months ago, we published an article in which we mentioned that influential conservatives including Candace Owens and Matt Walsh had endorsed secession. More recently, we wrote about Dan Bongino’s daily calls for a national divorce. The trend will continue until politicians can no longer ignore the desire of individuals across all states and all areas of the political spectrum: We want to govern ourselves, and we don’t want DC politicians from wildly different states controlling us. 

Early this morning, Matt Walsh (one of the most influential conservative journalists/podcasters) posted a poll on his Twitter. Of the 73,000 respondents, 61% support splitting up the united states.

In the same week, Ben Shapiro endorsed secession, as well.

I recently spoke with a tenth state representative in New Hampshire who supports independence and agreed to vote in favor of the CACR and to possibly sign on as a co-sponsor. If you live in New Hampshire, visit the state website and find your state representative. Email and call them every day until they agree that the people of New Hampshire should at least have a chance to vote on independence. Some Representatives are hellbent on stopping us from voting on our future. What are they afraid of?

The post Peaceful Separation Now Endorsed By Progressives, Centrists, Conservatives, & Libertarians appeared first on The Liberty Block.

Historic Constitutional Amendment Filed for NH to Exit United States

Free Keene - Wed, 2021-09-15 03:39 +0000

State Reps Mike Sylvia and Matt Santonastaso

Thanks to two heroic state representatives, New Hampshire has now taken the lead nationally in the independence movement. Yesterday, five-term state rep Mike Sylvia filed the text of a constitutional amendment that would, if passed, declare independence from the United States:

“Are you in favor of amending the first part of the New Hampshire Constitution by inserting, after article 7, a new article to read as follows:


[Art.] 7-a. [Independent Nation.] New Hampshire declares itself as independent from the United States and peaceably, immediately proceeds as a sovereign nation. All other references to the United States in this constitution and state statutes and regulations are nullified.”

To pass, it must first receive over 60% of the vote in both the state house and senate. If it does, it will then be placed on the 2022 ballot and then must receive over 2/3rds of the vote to be enacted. If so, it goes into effect immediately. There would be no political games like with United Kingdom’s “Brexit” from the European Union, which took several years to hammer out after the vote. New Hampshire will instantly declare our independence and nullify all standing agreements with the federal government gang. Compare this to the thus-far unsuccessful attempts in other US states.

In recent years, secession movements around the country have sprung up and made headlines in California and Texas, but with very little legislative support. In Texas, a state rep filed a bill this year that if passed, would merely have placed a non-binding referendum on the ballot for Texas voters to register their opinion on whether the Texas legislature should begin an arduous process of figuring out how to leave the United States. This bill’s filing resulted in plenty of media coverage and discussion, however, it died before even receiving a committee hearing. A key reason that New Hampshire was chosen as the destination for the Free State Project is that EVERY bill gets a public committee hearing, no matter how much support it has from the state reps. Most states are like Texas, where it’s a political game whether a bill even gets a hearing.

New Hampshire Independence

In California, a left-leaning group called “Yes California” has been trying for years to get an independence question on the ballot by gathering the hundreds-of-thousands of required signatures. If passed, the measure would require the legislature to declare independence from the US and become its own republic. So far, they have been unsuccessful despite garnering significant media coverage. Currently their website is offline, though their Twitter is still active. Even if they do get the question on the ballot and it passes, they may not survive the inevitable court challenge given the CA state constitution provides that California, “is an inseparable part of the United States of America.”

While I want to see both Texas and California exit the United States, it’s clear that with the filing of this constitutional amendment bill – called in NH a “CACR” or, “Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution” – that New Hampshire has taken the clear lead in the race to see who will leave the union first. Plus, unlike California, the NH constitution clearly protects the “Right of Revolution” in Article 10 and “State Sovereignty” in Article 7 of the NH Bill of Rights.

Representative Sylvia, in an exclusive interview with Free Keene, had this to say on why he filed the proposed amendment, “The people of America have forgotten their history, if we take the time to look at our roots we can see that our constitutions have received ‘lip service’ for far too long. While I can not change the direction of the federal government, I can hold up the New Hampshire constitution and demand that we honor its clear directives. Article 10 reads in part, ‘whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government.'”

The 2018 liberty “Legislator of the Year” representative Sylvia is joined by freshman state rep from the Keene area, Matt Santonastaso as the co-sponsor of the amendment. Other state reps have been approached and have expressed support and a full list will be released when the amendment is assigned a CACR number and moves onto a committee.

NH Independence NOW!

The process is just beginning, with Sylvia submitting the proposed text to NH Legislative Services on Monday. It may take several weeks for them to officially draft the CACR and send it back to Sylvia for final approval. It then is assigned to a committee which will then hold a public hearing sometime in early 2022. What happens from there is up to the committee and will largely depend on how much public support the amendment receives at its hearing.

Even if it doesn’t pass this time, it will get many conversations started about the evil federal government and why peacefully declaring independence is the best solution. Minds will be persuaded and changed. Many media and political attacks will be brought against us, as the power-seekers will be desperate to keep the status quo. Potential migrants to New Hampshire will be energized and make-the-move.

To learn more about why NH should divorce DC, check out the Foundation for NH Independence’s Frequently Asked Questions and Liberty Block’s “70+ Reasons to Divorce DC” and “Twelve Benefits of NH Independence“.

To help the movement, you can contact your local state reps in support of the amendment, connect with other supporters online, and more. Visit the “How You Can Help” page on for a full list of ideas.

Stay tuned to Free Keene and the Liberty Block for the latest on this historic process.

Breaking: NH Legislator Submits Legislation To Divorce DC; Declare Independence

The Liberty Block - Tue, 2021-09-14 00:08 +0000

On Monday afternoon, New Hampshire Representative Mike Sylvia officially submitted language to the Office Of Legislative Services for a constitutional amendment concurrent resolution (CACR). If the amendment passes the House and Senate with 60% of the vote in each chamber, it would be placed on the ballot in the November 2022 statewide election. If 66% of the voters choose to accept the amendment into the NH Constitution, it would immediately be added to our state’s governing document, and the Live Free or Die State would officially sever all ties with Washington DC, becoming a self-governing nation-state. 

On September 1st, The Liberty Block published an article listing over 70 powerful reasons why Granite Staters should support state independence from the federal government. And then, Dictator Biden announced that he would bypass Congress and mandate that American workers submit to his power and accept the COVID vaccine, regardless of whether they already had immunity to the virus. When Republican Governors voiced their concerns about executive/federal overreach, Biden threatened to “run over” the delinquent Governors using his power as the President. 

The language submitted today asks that a bill be filed to ask the legislature whether the following language should be placed on the ballot for the people to vote on:

“[Art.] 7-a. [Independent Nation.] New Hampshire peaceably declares

independence from the United States and immediately proceeds as a

sovereign nation. All other references to the United States in this

constitution, state statutes, and regulations are nullified.”

If the legislation passes the House and the Senate (the governor does not need to sign a CACR) it would give the people of New Hampshire an opportunity to vote on their future relationship with Washington DC.

The voters of this great state have not had an opportunity to reevaluate their relationship with our Lords in DC ever in their lifetimes; their ancestors made the decision to join the union 240 years ago, in a different world, one in which the federal government did not violate our every right, and did not steal half of our money to fund their tyranny. 

If you believe that it’s time to give voters a choice – all this legislation does is give voters a voice – then please tell your state representatives and senators to support this constitutional amendment. 

In an interview with, Mike Sylvia said: The people of America have forgotten their history, if we take the time to look at our roots we can see that our constitutions have received ‘lip service’ for far too long. While I can not change the direction of the federal government, I can hold up the New Hampshire constitution and demand that we honor its clear directives. Article 10 reads in part, “whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government.”

To find out more about New Hampshire independence, visit The Foundation For NH Independence, NH Exit, Americans United For Peaceful Separation, and read our many articles on independence and self-governance.

*UPDATE: Eleven Representatives have indicated that they will support this legislation.

The post Breaking: NH Legislator Submits Legislation To Divorce DC; Declare Independence appeared first on The Liberty Block.

The Manchester Free Press aims to bring together in one place everything that you need to know about what’s happening in the Free State of New Hampshire.

As of August 2021, we are currently in the process of removing dead links and feeds, and updating the site with newer ones.




Our friends & allies

New Hampshire

United States