There is a tendency among the progressive establishment to lean on mental health issues when it comes to mass shootings. It’s easy to see why. Almost everyone they know has mental health issues, so what else could it be?
And they don’t know anyone they would trust with a firearm, so that must mean everyone else is like that. Unstable and dangerous, likely to fly off the handle at any moment. It’s a reasonable assumption given the peer group.
And I’m speaking of the rank and file pussy-hat, black fist, occupy Wall Street, Climate Cult, defund, stand with Ukraine, party-regular hoplophobes. The people who believe the top-down rhetoric whose true purpose is disarmament so that government won’t have to fear armed resistance to planned tyranny.
They just think guns are scary and know no one they’d trust to have them, even the police they claim as a reason why we don’t need to possess our own firearms.
Like I said, mentally unstable.
But how crazy can a shooter be if they are lucid enough to pick a gun-free zone like a public school over an NRA meeting or a gun show? If your goal is to commit mass murder, regardless of the motivation, then hard targets are off the list.
It only follows then that these would-be murderers are otherwise of sound mind in that respect. If that’s true, then hardening targets is the answer. And it’s the answer because events like Parkland and Uvalde have proven something else.
The Government (schools, policing, etc.), no matter how extensive its programs, planning, or preparation, are incapable of protecting teachers, staff, and children from people who know that this same government has disarmed them and takes pride in that fact.
They advertise it.
What to do
There is no guaranteed solution to violence of any sort (humans being humans), but if you’d like to reduce the chance of a school shooting, stabbing, or any related acts of mass violence, end gun-free zones. It’s not as if they have prevented school shootings.
Take the signs down. Make noise about hardening the target. Lie, it’s not like schools aren’t good at that. They lie to the parents all the time. Hide the truth.
Start a rumor about arming teachers. And you should, by the way, arm them (I bet you’ll get volunteers), but the mere presumption of resistance can significantly reduce the perception that kids and staff would be easy prey.
Wouldn’t it reflect better on leadership if they demonstrated more sense than the so-called crazy people looking to commit mass murder?
Apparently not, and that’s because the disarmament party doesn’t truly care about life, children, or even safety. They just want you disarmed. And as long as their rank-and-file water carriers ape the approved message, what we’ll get is more dead kids.
Bonus material; Penn and Teller explain the Second Amendment.
The post Anyone Know Where We can Get “Leaders” with More “Sense” Than Mass Shooters? appeared first on Granite Grok.