Thursday • April 25 • 2024
Vol.XVI • No.XVII
Manchester, N.H.
Writing in Federalist #46, James Madison provided a 4-step strategy to bring down federal programs without waiting for the federal government to limit its own power.
Here’s what he had to say in the letter, The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared:
“Should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps refusal to cooperate with officers of the Union, the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassment created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, very serious impediments; and were the sentiments of several adjoining States happen to be in Union, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”
In short, Madison said that when the federal government passes an unconstitutional measure there are powerful methods to oppose it – amongst the people and in the states. He also pointed out that those same methods were available even for warrantable, that is constitutional, measures.
They are:
1. Disquietude of the people – Madison expected the people would throw a fit when the feds usurped power or tried to implement unpopular policies. That leads to the next step.
2. Repugnance and Refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union – Noncompliance. The #1 dictionary of the time defined repugnance as “disobedient; not obsequious” (compliant). If you want to stop the federal government, you have to disobey them. Madison also suggested that people would perhaps directly refuse to cooperate with federal agents. This is an approach we preach here every day at the Tenth Amendment Center. James Madison apparently knew what we know today. The feds rely on cooperation from state and local governments, as well as individuals. When enough people refuse to comply, they simply can’t enforce their so-called laws.
3. The frowns of the executive magistracy of the State – Here Madison envisions governors formally protesting federal actions. This not only raises public awareness; executive leadership will also lead to the next step – legislative action.
4. Legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions – Madison keeps this open-ended, and in the years soon after, which I’ll cover shortly, we learn how both he and Thomas Jefferson applied this step.
Madison also told us that if several adjoining States would do the same it would be an effective tool to stop federal acts. To repeat, he said that doing this:
“would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.”
Judge Andrew Napolitano agreed recently and said that people need to stop enforcing unconstitutional federal laws. He also said that if you could get an entire state doing this, it would make federal laws “nearly impossible” to enforce.
LEGISLATIVE DEVICES
Thomas Jefferson followed up on this in 1798 with the same kind of advice. That year, the Adams administration passed a wildly unconstitutional attack on the freedom of speech with the Alien and Sedition Acts. In response, while sitting as vice-president, Jefferson secretly drafted the Kentucky Resolutions, and here’s a little of what he wrote:
“The several states composing the united states of America are not united on a principle of unlimited submission to their general government.”
“where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy”
“that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them”
Madison was consistent in his views on this. In 1798, he also drafted and helped pass something known as the Virginia Resolutions, a state-level “legislative device” in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts. Here’s a key part:
…in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them.
Like Madison advised in Federalist #46, both he and Thomas Jefferson advised a state-level response to dangerous federal acts.
Jefferson told us that “nullification is the rightful remedy.” And Madison told us that states are “duty-bound to interpose.”
When Daniel Webster called on these same principles in response to military conscription plans during the War of 1812, he said:
“The operation of measures thus unconstitutional and illegal ought to be prevented by a resort to other measures which are both constitutional and legal. It will be the solemn duty of the State governments to protect their own authority over their own militia and to interpose between their citizens and arbitrary power. These are among the objects for which the State governments exist, and their highest obligations bind them to the preservation of their own rights and the liberties of their people”
Here’s the bottom line:
And that resistance needs to be your first response, not your last.
Michael Boldin | The Tenth Amendment Center
The post James Madison: Four Steps to Stop Federal Programs appeared first on Granite Grok.
In case you live under a rock anywhere other than the rubble in Gaza, you likely have heard we are long overdue for a world war with the Jews as the centerpiece, because why not? Though Ukraine and Russia showed serious promise, it just wasn’t generating the kind of “back by popular demand” energy one gets from our favorite contestants: Everybody vs. the Jews!
God knows we need something to spice up our otherwise boring day-to-day lives. Climate change has been tepid at best as an existential crisis and the COVID virus fizzled out like an unattended can of Bud Light. Black Lives Matter isn’t ready to rock until we are all ready to vote, so we need something of a palate cleanser to keep the doldrums from setting in that can also justify these $7 gallons of gas.
However a silly little Sabbath day skirmish just won’t get it done patriots! We need something that can not only keep eyes on the screens but bring this country together against a common enemy who live in a gated community half-way around the world. Those Jihadis on the wrong side of the razor wire messed with the wrong international police force – I tell you what! What would Jewish Jesus do in this situation? Let’s hear it from the holy horse’s mouth:
“You have heard it said ‘an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’ but I tell you…mow those dirty SOBs down with drone strikes!” (Matthew 5:38-39, New World Order Version)
The Prince of Pieces of terrorist body’s flying through the air has spoken! So let it be written, so let it be done. Amen.
If you’re not convinced by the Word of God then perhaps one of His emissaries can set you straight. Pastor Greg Locke, never one to mince words, was fresh out of rants once COVID passed and he’s here to remind you God loves Israel and hates Arabs (among others). Setting aside the call to not display one’s righteous deeds in public Mr. Locke was so full of the spirit of death he took to the pulpit to remind us the only answer to religiously motivated terror is religiously motivated genocide. In case you weren’t sure who he was reppin’ the stage was covered in Israeli flags and bellicose hyperbole. Talk about charisma! It’s nice to see he had a change of heart about the government and the media not being trustworthy and trampling our rights and has put his trust back in a government and media ready to trample other people’s rights. That’s called repentance heathens.
Now you might think getting the economy going is reason enough for Joe Biden to bring us into a mostly peaceful world war, by proxy of course. I mean, these missiles aren’t going to shoot themselves and the folks at Lockheed Martin and Raytheon are piling up the inventory, so let’s quit fooling ourselves into thinking we can put food on the table peacefully. Don’t be ridiculous. We don’t need another union strike in the weapons sector right now Habibi. The American people just got the dog woke up in them and we’re itching for a fight. In other words, it’s time to wag the dog bitches!
With an epic battle like this about to rage for the machine we’re going to need a soundtrack, or at least a single to hit the airwaves as, you know, like an anthem? I like Toby Keith and Barbara Streisand for a duet. How do you like “I’ll Be Bombing Hamas for Christmas” as a title?
In Jesus name, of course.
The post Bananas: Time To Genocide… In Jesus Name appeared first on Granite Grok.
As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart’s desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
-H.L. Mencken, On Politics: A Carnival of Buncombe
Must I really need to say any more than that?
(H/T: Matt)
The post Notable Quote – And So We Are There… appeared first on Granite Grok.
This is an attempt to “break out” memes, links, and my commentary about the situation in Israel / the Middle East so as to not overload the standard meme posts that I do. My last “normal” meme post. And my last Israel-related one. I don’t just have memes in the Israel ones, but lots of informative links as well as hopefully-insightful commentary, so if you didn’t see the last one, please do go look after you’re done with this one. Same thing here: lots and lots of links, info, videos, memes, and my added commentary (that I hope adds perspective and value).
Note that while I will attempt discretion in images that I post, not all are “squeaky clean” in terms of the eyes of the innocent. Be warned here.
WHEN WILL IT END?
Silent Cries Amidst Invasion: Israel Must Eliminate Hamas :: Middle East Forum (meforum.org)
The disarmament of Gaza is not an act of oppression – it is a stride towards peace. Each rocket, every weapon that is wrested from the hands of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, echoes the distant but undeniable drumbeats of a region where children can dream without the nightmare of war shadowing their innocence.
Israel’s consideration to eliminate Hamas’s leadership and disband its organization is born not from a thirst for retribution, but from strategic and legal necessity. It is rooted in the objective to neutralize an existential threat, to silence the guns that leave children orphaned, and to dismantle the ideological edifice that fuels a relentless campaign of terror.
This is not a decision made lightly, but is necessitated by the evolving nature of the threat. There is a detailed case for a comprehensive military intervention against Hamas, reasons that go beyond the need to respond to the despicable invasion launched this morning from Gaza.
Hamas’s charter unequivocally calls for the destruction of the State of Israel. Their acts of aggression are not limited skirmishes or disputes over borders, but pose a fundamental existential threat to Israel and its citizens.
As I said in the last post – when your neighbor’s stated & sworn goal is your utter destruction, there can be no “coexistence”. Nor can there be mercy, because they have demonstrated by deeds they have none for Israel or Jews.
Israel has the right — and the duty — to besiege Gaza (nypost.com) (bolding added):
International pressure demanding Israel provide terrorists with electricity and other goods is absurd and without basis in international law.
As the besieging state, Israel is not required to fund or assist Hamas’ war effort as it attempts to butcher Jews.
Siege law includes a humanitarian aspect: International law requires that Israel facilitate the passage of food and medicine by third parties, but only if such goods can be reliably delivered without diversion to Hamas and without fear the goods will give Hamas an economic and military boost.
Given Hamas’ 16-year exploitation of humanitarian aid and infiltration of human-rights and international organizations in Gaza, diversion is not merely a possibility — it is a certainty.
—
So Israel’s bombed Syria’s airport. I had immediately wondered that there could be two possible reasons. Either Israel was doing this to bait Iran into actively joining in as a pretext for going after Iran itself (IMHO a suicidal move if done intentionally), or that there was intelligence that the airport was a landing spot for munitions heading – ultimately – to Israel’s northern territories. The second one:
Israel Strikes Damascus Airport as Iran’s Foreign Affairs Minister Bringing Tons of Weapons to Hezb’Allah is Scheduled to Land – Geller Report
The Airbus A340 carrying the Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister about to land in Damascus also had several commanders of the Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps on board and several tons of anti-tank missiles for Hezbollah.
Now I don’t know what level of proof Israel had for this. I also don’t know if this constitutes casus belli with Iran. But Iran is clearly in this, up to its neck. And this risks Syria coming in actively.
OOH, we need to vet this information very carefully. This is WWIII territory. OTOH, remember, in Shia Islam their Messiah cannot come until there’s a world war. To them, all this is a feature, not a bug.
—
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/fafo.mp4
Per this comment on another Grok post, Hamas doesn’t follow the Geneva Conventions:
Yet listen to these fools demand Israel cease fire, follow the “rules of war” and not hit civilians in Gaza. Hamas isn’t following the rules of war. (Geneva Convention as amended):
– combatants should be wearing uniforms. Hamas does not.
– combatants must not mix military and civilian areas, especially critical facilities like hospitals. Hamas deliberately locates military operations in civilian buildings. Their HQ is under a hospital. A missile factory is under a building labeled as an elementary school. They have tunnel operations & weapons caches in buildings next to the border wall labeled “UN.” They use mosques for weapons storage. Hamas tells civilians to not evacuate then cries for the cameras when civilians are killed.
You want to stop terror attacks? Use their religion against them:
How American Soldiers Used Pig’s Blood and Corpses to Fight Muslim Terrorism | Frontpage Mag
And B”H I pray I’m never involved in a shooting with terrorists, but… if I am, and I’m the victor, I need to start carrying a jar of bacon bits. Just in case. (Doubtless to have “hate crimes” charges filed against me.)
—
Another tidbit is this map that was found on dead Hamas terrorists. This is an important detail – maps are critical. From a Telegram channel:
“Hamas Militants Had Detailed Maps of Israeli Towns, Military Bases and Infiltration Routes.
Documents found on Hamas militants show scale of planning behind deadly attack”
Great reporting by the WSJ.“TEL AVIV—Hamas militants who flooded into southern Israel from Gaza last weekend carried detailed maps of the towns and military bases that they targeted. Some also carried tactical guides identifying weak spots on Israeli army armored vehicles.
The documents, written in Arabic, were recovered from the sites of attacks or bodies of dead Hamas fighters by Israeli civilians, soldiers and emergency personnel and seen by The Wall Street Journal. Authorities are examining the trove, Israeli officials said.
Taken together, the documents indicate that Hamas set out from the start to target not just military installations, but to attack civilian population centers and to take hostages, and they offer evidence of the scale of Hamas’s intelligence-gathering and the degree of planning for the assault.
More than 1,300 Israelis were killed in the attacks, which have deeply shaken the country’s sense of security and prompted Israel to declare war on Hamas.
“They knew exactly what the targets were going to be,’” said Michael Milshtein, a former Israeli military intelligence officer and head of Palestinian Studies Forum at Tel Aviv University. “There is nothing close to this level of planning in any steps Hamas had done in the past.””
@RWMaloneMD
What’s the point? That this was well-planned and for a long time. Years.
—
Names of the dead.
—
Is a multi-nation assault on Israel nigh? Sure looks like it as Iraqi volunteers go to the Jordan border waiting for permission to cross and attack:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/iraqies-on-the-move.mp4
Iran is apparently moving its armor:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Iran-moves-forces.mp4
Now, I see three dread possibilities here if all these forces are permitted through:
One: They attack, and the US comes in to help Israel. Now it’s all of Islam against not just Israel, but the US, and under Article 5, all of NATO. And things get “spicy” real quick. After all, what do you think all those millions of Muslims in America and Europe will do? Jihad will go global.
Two: The US stands by; the forces there are for show and the US stands. All those warships there being just for show and to lull Israel into believing the US had their back. In the absolute “best case” for Israel, Israel is forced to use nuclear weapons and survives because of that. And is now a world pariah nation despite the clear choice between that and total annihilation. Worst case, Israel is wiped out even with nuclear weapons used.
Three: Iran has practiced attacking mockup carriers and doubtless learned from the exercise. What if those carriers are there, not as support for Israel, but to put them in a position where Iranian forces can get to them to sink them? The US Navy is then crippled, and under either Two or Three, the precedent for every aggressor everywhere is clear: the US is not coming to the rescue. Hello, Taiwan? South Korea? Philippines?
HISTORY
Remember that when Israel was formed, the regular armies of FIVE ARAB NATIONS attacked to wipe out the fledgling state. Part of the result of that attack was the capture of half of Jerusalem, the expulsion of the Jews within, and the illegal occupation and actual – albeit also illegal – annexation of what was renamed the “West Bank” by Jordan.
Everyone talks about The Nakba, the expulsion (mostly) voluntary flight of the Arabs from their homes during the initial war of Israel’s formation. We know this was ordered by the invading armies; there are audio recordings of the residents being told via radio to flee their homes so that the Arabs could have a freer hand in “dealing with” the Jews. Though, to be accurate, there were actual expulsions too. Cry me a river after this:
Nobody discusses the 850,000-odd Jews expelled by Arab nations (excellent book!) in the run up to and subsequent to the formation of the nation of Israel. It’s only the misery – and it was misery – for the Arabs fleeing Israel. But why would their fellow Arabs not help? Because the Arabs held their fellows hostage to create an eternal sore point against Israel, while Israel – with difficulty – slowly absorbed a pulse of Jews greater than actually existed in the land at the time. (From 1948 to 1967 the Egyptians in Gaza and the Jordanians in the “West Bank” had almost two decades to build housing and help their fellow Muslims… why didn’t they? Again, psychologically, understand that the Arabs kept their fellows in squalor because all these poor refugees from Israel were warriors in the eternal jihad against the Jewish state.)
We also keep hearing about “The Occupation” as the source of grievance. What “occupation” was there during the formation of the PLO in 1964? What “Israel” was there in the Nebi Musa riots in 1920, or Hebron Massacre in 1929, or the Farhud pogrom in 1941 in Iraq?
I discussed, in the last post, the Islamic command to reconquer any territory that was once Islamic. Every square inch of the land of Israel falls under that category, formerly being part of the Ottoman empire. Thus, irrespective of anything else, it is a Koranic command to retake it. It would not matter if it were held by Jews, or Christians, or Buddhists, or Shinto practitioners, or anyone else. The Koran says retake it, it must be retaken.
The 1967 Six Day War (excellent book) and other history sources show definitively that the Six Day War was a defensive war. What does international law say about defensive wars? My non-scholarly understanding and research indicate that should the defender gain land, that is their land. Furthermore, Israeli settlements and control of Jerusalem the “West Bank”, and even possibly Gaza are not a violation of international law. (Also here, same author.)
Applied to the case of Israel, uti possidetis juris would dictate that Israel inherit the boundaries of the Mandate of Palestine as they existed in May, 1948. The doctrine would thus support Israeli claims to any or all of the currently hotly disputed areas of Jerusalem (including East Jerusalem), the West Bank, and even potentially the Gaza Strip (though not the Golan Heights).
And here is an analysis of the Golan Heights specifically, though the same arguments apply to Judea and Samaria as well, and Gaza too:
The views of the U.N’s International Law Commission and most scholars in finding defensive conquest as lawful under the U.N. Charter should not be surprising given that it simply reflected broad state practice under the Charter. In the years immediately following the adoption of the Charter, many of the victorious Allies took territory of the defeated nations. All these annexations have been recognized, without controversy by the U.S. and international community. To mention only a few of these instances, Holland unilaterally annexed parts of Germany in 1949; Greece and Yugoslavia took parts of Italy; the U.S.S.R and Poland annexed large parts of Germany. The ILC in its deliberations specifically addressed the legal basis for these annexations: because the underlying use of force was lawful (defensive), the acquisition of territory can be permitted.
People argue that Israel was “illegally” carved out of territory held by others. Well, so was Pakistan. Pakistan was formed by carving away a chunk of India. Hindus fled for India, Muslims fled for Pakistan. Millions. So where is the ongoing international outcry over that? Or is it, again, Israel double-standard time?
But wait, there’s more. There have been many other “disputed territories” – even outright illegal occupations – yet there is an obsession about Israel:
Indeed, many other countries maintain obviously illegal occupations, but are not subject to repeated demonization. Turkey has occupied the northern part of Cyprus for 51 years. China has occupied Tibet for 72 years. Yet China and Turkey are not the victims of constant smear campaigns by the international community.
And while this Law Review article is both thick with legalese and IMHO very narrowly threaded through multiple needles, my take away is that territory acquired from a defensive war is different than territory acquired by an offensive war (echoing my statement above). Another article states that settler populations in such territories are not a violation of the Geneva Convention. Further, Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005; its blockade of that territory only began in 2007. I wonder what happened in those three years that drove the creation of a blockade – no small undertaking.
The double standard reeks again. Israel left Gaza to the Gazans and what did the Gazans do? Fire more missiles. Ramp up production (see below about using water pipes for missile material). Dig tunnels. Look and compare how much territory would be covered by missiles in other countries with similar situations:
Now, given what’s happening in Ukraine, imagine if Zelensky started sending thousands of missiles across 70% of Russia. Would Putin listen to cries of “tolerance” and “coexistence”? In that vein:
One more tidbit on double-standards:
THE ISLAMIC MENTALITY
There is a quote by the late Golda Meir:
There will be peace in the Middle East only when the Arabs love their children more than they hate Israel.
Here’s an interview with the mastermind of the Sbarro Pizzeria bombing. Note that she was undeterred by the fact that while her target was religious Jews, she let the operation go ahead seeing that others – not religious Jews – were there too.
Ahlam Tamimi Chose Sbarro’s ‘Religious Jews’ as Murder Target
No remorse at all for the civilians killed. Because in Islam, again, there are no infidel civilians. Repeat that ten times. Or twenty, until it sinks in. And there was another interview segment when she smiled when she found out more children had been killed than she’d thought.
And now read this:
EU Spent $100M On Pipelines That Hamas Turned Into Rockets. (thenationalpulse.com)
So they had actual water pipelines, which were cannibalized into rocket materials. Water, life-giving water, society-building water… but that’s not as important as their Prime Directive: Kill Jews.
As I said in my last topical post, it doesn’t matter if their kids die of hunger or thirst or lack of medical care or exposure. That’s jihad; those dead children are shahids, i.e., martyrs, getting an instant ticket to paradise. Know the enemy. Know what motivates them.
Consider this article from 2013 about 500 tons – tons! – of concrete used for one tunnel from Gaza into Israel. One tunnel. And that was ten years ago.
A Hamas military spokesman in Gaza, Abu Obeida, was defiant over the tunnel discovery, saying on his official Twitter account that “thousands” more tunnels would be dug out.
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Hamas-tunnels.mp4
There are consequences to this diversion:
From the Telegram channel where I got this:
The Israeli army is distributing leaflets in Gaza urging residents to go to shelters The text calls on people to leave their homes “for their own safety” and go to shelters. There are no shelters in Gaza. People took refuge in schools and hospitals. https://t.me/LauraAbolichannel
And WHY are there no shelters in Gaza? Because of that aforementioned concrete diversion. There have been dozens and dozens of tunnels found:
He admitted that the tunnels are used for infiltration of Israel, but said that offensive operations have never caused the death of civilians in Israel, and denied allegations of planned mass attacks on Israeli civilians.
*tweeeeet* Taqiyya alert! Understand something very clearly: to a Muslim engaged in jihad, there is no such thing as an “infidel civilian”. If you are not a Muslim, then definitionally, you are in the house of war. Consider the news that a Hamas terrorist, at the concert – definitionally civilian – was shooting a round into each porta-potty. If this is not intended to kill civilians, what would rise to that level?
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/shooting-portapotties.mp4
But this is not a misinterpretation of Islam. Here’s an example – early on in Mohammed’s career – of how he treated civilians; women and children:
Listen and note well the words of a Hamas official’s son who “woke up” to the reality of his religion (this was an audio but I managed to upload the video):
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Son2.mp4
Audio only:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Hamas-member-who-woke-up-son-on-islam.mp4.mp3
Note well what the guy says: Mohammed slept with raped the wife of the leader of a massacred Jewish tribe the same day he murdered her husband. The. Same. Day. From the very beginning, terror and brutality. Allah is greater than your god. Another specific example from Mohammed’s time:
Allah’s Sword of Terror (raymondibrahim.com)
For example, only recently I came across a video (video was removed hence no link) of a modern-day Egyptian Salafi explaining how Khalid raped Layla, the wife of Malik bin Nuwayra—but only after he severed her husband’s head, lit it on fire, and cooked his dinner on it.
And in a private email conversation with Political Islam‘s founder, Dr. Bill Warner, he confirmed that not only did Khalid rape the man’s wife… he did it in a pool of her husband’s blood. Like his leader, raping a woman the same day her husband is killed. And remember in the previous post that it’s a Koranic command to strike terror into the hearts of infidels? From the same article:
Of course, all this accords with the Koran’s many commands to “strike terror” into the hearts of disbelievers, be they born infidels or apostates (see Koran 3:151, 8:12, 8:60).
From earlier in that piece:
Khalid was recalled and questioned by the caliph—not because he killed and dined on an apostate’s head and “married” his wife, but because some believed that Malik was still Muslim, not an apostate to be treated so, and that Khalid killed him on the accusation of apostasy only as a pretext to take possession of his wife, whose beauty was renowned.
Note well why he was recalled. Not because of his brutality, but the fact that he might have done it to a fellow Muslim; even then, he remained in Mohammed’s service. He led the Islamic forces against the Byzantines in 636, four years after Mohammed’s death.
Flip it. Imagine if one of Jesus’ disciples had cannibalized a man by cooking his head and raping the widow. Do you believe he’d have remained part of Jesus’ following? Of course not. He’d have been driven out. But Khalid was kept in the fold; they weren’t bothered by the actual deeds, but merely that he might have acted against a fellow Muslim and his desire for the man’s wife. Does that non-expulsion not tell you everything you need to know about Mohammed and the “faith” he spawned? And its supremacist view of Muslims versus infidels?
Slaughter and terror are at the heart of Islam. For example, although Hallel Ariel was living on a “settlement”, what crime did this teenage girl commit?
Like the murder of Hadas Fogel and her family (mentioned in last post), her murderer was celebrated… and his family was eligible for $350 a month from the Palestinian fund for martyrs. Both Hallel, and Hadas, and limitless other victims of terror, their “crime” was that they were Jews and were on formerly Islamic land. Land that, repeating, must be retaken. Except what land was this little girl on? Oh, wait, France. Bolding added in the excerpt.
Mohammed Merah did not chase down a French-Jewish seven year old girl, put a gun to her head and pull the trigger because he came from an economically depressed area or any of the other media spin. He was only doing what Muslims had been doing to non-Muslims for over a thousand years. He didn’t do what he did because he was “radicalized”, he did it because he became a fully committed Muslim.
…
Muslims have hated Jews before the telephone, the telegraph, the steam engine, gunpowder, movable type and paper currency. And now surrounded by smartphones, credit cards and jet planes, they still hate them. That simple undeniable fact is denied by every government, and in every university and every center of culture. And every one of those deniers has blood on his hands.
The Toulouse massacre, 2012 (markhumphrys.com) (links and bolding in the original; italics replaced by underlining):
The Islamist way of war:
The jihadist killer at the French school ran after this little Jewish girl, 8 year old Miriam Monsonego, grabbed her, and shot her dead at close range.
He shot dead a 3 year old boy and a 6 year old boy at the gates. “CCTV footage from a camera at the gates reportedly showed that one of the boys was executed as he crawled away on his hands and knees while his father and brother lay dying on the pavement.”
Her crime? Being a Jew. Alive. Alive anywhere. The below permission is nothing new, not new at all.
‘Scholar’ Claims Jihadis Have Permission to Kill Israelis ‘Wherever They May Be’ | The Gateway Pundit | by Guest Contributor
Terror. Unremitting fear. And as I said in an earlier piece, Fear is the Mind Killer, one of the things the human mind craves is stability. Islam’s attacks are targeted specifically to create uncertainty and fear – with the perpetual offer of “Just submit, convert, and all will return to normal.” Genius – diabolical level genius. Just like the genius of granting paradise to those who die fighting the infidel… especially pertinent when you have rich Muslims taking multiple wives, so the poor Muslims either have to take booty and female captives, an incentive for jihad, or die and get their 72 virgins. Infernal-level genius. Satanic level genius.
Take a look here – this is New York, the Long Island Expressway:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Long-Island-expressway.mp4
MORE ON INTERSECTIONALITY / LEFTIST SUPPORT
Asheville trantifa activist praises Palestinians following terror attacks, says ‘enemies’ of LGBTQ people are in the US | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com
In a hypothetical world, I would actually enjoy it if Islam comes to dominate and this… guy?… is held down and beheaded.
Anti-Semitism unites the Left with Islam:
Thoughts on leftwing support for Hamas and radical Islam | Voice (christianpost.com)
The simple answer is that Hamas is antisemitic, and antisemitism is part of the spirit of the age, the mentality of what the New Testament calls “the world.” Darkness is drawn to darkness.
And this is the primary thing that unites the leftwing supporters of Hamas: latent (or flagrant) antisemitism, often disguised as staunch anti-Zionism. This shared hatred (or, at the least, severely critical, totally unbalanced attitude towards Israel) overrides all the other issues.
As I said in the last post: Israel started out intending to be a Socialist state. They “woke up” and went free market. Like a Muslim who quits the faith, leaving the Socialist fold is apostasy demanding execution.
Students are indoctrinated; PoliMath takes Harvard students who celebrated dead Jews now begging for MERCY APART in BRUTAL thread – Twitchy. Now, of course, they’re weeping that they too might be “canceled”.
And need I bring up Jewish support for Hamas?
Among the event’s key sponsors were three anti-Zionist Jewish groups including Not In Our Name, which is based at the City University of New York, and Judaism On Our Own Terms, which was founded more than a decade ago as Open Hillel.
Whether Leftist or LGBT or non-Muslim POC support, it all translates to one fate if Islam wins.
—
Decisions, decisions:
—
Stupid liberal Jews. You really thought they’d stand with you?
These Comments From the BLM Founder Are Making People Wake Up – Twitchy
Just who do you think BLM will stand with if things kick off for real in the US?
PALLYWOOD
Hamas terror attack on Israel brought out the worst in media; Drew Holden has the receipts – Twitchy
Because the uber-intellects of the Left / Enemedia complex (same thing really) can’t imagine being fooled. And so they become useful idiots.
—
Storing corpses in ice cream trucks… wait, what? Ice cream trucks???
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ice-cream-trucks.mp4
But… but… but open air prison! Concentration camp!
TERROR COMING HERE?
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Hamss-goals-1-1.mp4
In their own words, with throat-cutting instructions – and note the date on the first segment – 2020. Three years ago they were giving instructions on how to slit throats. They’ve been slaughtering Jews for decades (links in the original):
In 2002, Hamas committed one of its deadliest massacres during the Jewish holiday of Passover in the Israeli city of Netanya. Thirty civilians were murdered and 140 wounded when a Hamas terrorist, disguised as a woman, detonated a suitcase filled with powerful explosives in the dining room of a hotel where Jews were celebrating the Passover holiday. Most of the victims were senior citizens (70 and over). The oldest victim was 90 and the youngest, 20.
Over the past three decades, Hamas officials never concealed their group’s ambition to destroy Israel through Jihad (holy war). Hardly a day has passed without another Hamas statement concerning the need to “liberate all Palestine” (meaning destroy Israel).
And it begins now. Globally. China. France. They’re marching in force in Sydney, Australia.
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/hamas-march-in-sydney.mp4
Consequences of mass migration. And how do you feel now, Tikkun Olam Fetish Jews?
An Open Letter to Pro-Migration / SJW Jews – Urban Scoop
When your synagogues are aflame and surrounded by all those “welcome the stranger” migrants crying out ALLAHU AKHBAR?
See Aesop. Remember, jihad by migration is a Koranic imperative too.
Bill Warner, PhD: Hijra, Islamic Migration
And on Muslim Demographics:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Muslim-Demographics_360p.mp4
TREADING ON THE POLITICAL
For years now, I’ve had many people asking me a simple question: How is it that Jews keep voting “D”? In particular, after things like this:
Or six billion dollars to #1 terror nation Iran, perhaps? Or worse, How the Biden Administration Helped Iran’s Mullahs Try to Fulfill Their Dream of Annihilating Israel :: Gatestone Institute. Don’t forget about pallets of cash to Iran by Obama. Or Obama’s letting Iran keep a stealth drone to reverse-engineer. And let’s not forget Obama dissing Netanyahu. In times past, wars were started over this level of mistreatment of a head of state.
Do you think that fungible money might get diverted to terror?
Biden Sent Millions of Dollars In Covid Relief Funds to Palestine (townhall.com)
How the Biden Administration Helped Iran’s Mullahs Try to Fulfill Their Dream of Annihilating Israel :: Gatestone Institute
Hamas and Amoral Clarity (townhall.com) (bolding added):
As soon as President Joe Biden took power, he resumed massive subsidies to radical Palestinians, canceled by the prior Trump administration.
He ignored his state Department’s warnings that such fungible money would soon fuel Hamas terrorism.
His administration dropped sanctions against Iran, ensuring that Tehran would enjoy a multi-billion-dollar windfall to be distributed to Israel’s existential enemies — another fact well-known to the Biden administration.
But the allegiance to the Democrats comes from the fact that the vast majority of American Jews are Plopping Jews:
Plopping Jews
The noble idea of repairing the world has been hijacked. And from here, The fraud of American Jews’ “Tikkun Olam” (melaniephillips.com), comes this statement (link in the original, italics replaced by underlining; I’ve bought – but in full disclosure have not had time to read – the book):
The community’s secular religion of tikkun olam, or supposedly Jewish social justice, is a fraud.
As Jonathan Neumann puts it in his excellent book To Heal the World?, American Jews have been led to believe that “the purpose of the Jews in the world is to campaign for higher taxes, sexual permissiveness, reduced military spending, illegal immigration, opposition to fracking, the banishment of religion from the public square and every other liberal cause under the sun — all in the name of God”.
It’s not Jewish, just, or even very social, constituting a mish-mash of Marxism, moral relativism and paganism.
A parallel book: Why Are Jews Liberals?
There will be consequences to this cleaving to the Democrats:
But… but… but Orange Man bad. How’s that likely to work out for Israel, American Jews?
Even as the Democrats see the growing voting Islamic demographic and rush to curry favor:
Talking about demographics? This is NYC:
https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Isam-in-nyc.mp4
Massive protests in London. Paris. All around the WESTERN WORLD. Again – if the US, and by extension NATO under Article 5, get sucked in, what’s going to happen globally with millions of Islamic migrants in America and Europe?
GIVING SUPPORT TO ISRAEL
You can’t go wrong with a donation here:
Connections Israel
I’ve contributed to them for almost 20 years. And please share this post far and wide. There’s a lot of info here, that many people don’t know.
A CONCLUDING THOUGHT FOR THIS POST
I was talking to my good friend in Israel early this week. He was shocked, as everyone I know there is. “How could we, so strong, have this happen”?
Now, there are many speculations floating around – not without circumstantial evidence, I regretfully add – of a stand-down, or some other withdrawal to enable this as a tool to prop up Netanyahu. If this can be proven, IMHO, Israel needs the death penalty reinstated for this level of treason. IF. PROVEN.
But even without that, it’s clear from new reporting that Hamas had spent two years planning this (see the map, above), including putting Israel to sleep. Also, apparently, there were jamming efforts on Israel’s electronic security. Plus a complete asleep-at-the-switch mentality on drone warfare and its immense impact – a complete underestimation of the enemy. Three articles here (same website, chronological order):
Bayou Renaissance Man: The grim reality of a modern battlefield
Bayou Renaissance Man: Lessons learned from a recent war
Bayou Renaissance Man: Drone warfare in Ukraine, and its lessons for future wars
So in this conversation something very critical came up. I’ve commented on the Great Cycle in my three essays on the biological roots of civilizational collapse:
Civilizational Collapse and Biology (Part 1) – Urban Scoop
Civilizational Collapse and Biology (Part 2) – Urban Scoop
Civilizational Collapse and Biology (Part 3) – Urban Scoop
And, inspired by this scene from the scifi channel movie Dune, I came up with a related progression:
Success breeds confidence
Confidence breeds complacency
Complacency breeds distraction
And when distracted one becomes vulnerable
Critical lessons for Israel… and indeed the entire West. We’ve had it far too good for far too long. And we’ve become complacent. And distracted.
Security chiefs got wind of something amiss in Gaza, thought it was a drill – reports | The Times of Israel
The generals reportedly concluded that the activity in Gaza was probably a drill, and agreed to hold further discussions in the morning. They reportedly chose not to raise an alert or boost forces to the Gaza border area, since the issue was not considered pressing.
Complacency and distraction. Underestimation of the enemy. Letting down your guard because of routine.
Disaster.
The post Israel: Memes and Commentary appeared first on Granite Grok.
We know what Joe Biden is doing to us on the home front. We see it at the grocery store, the gas pumps, and our utility bills. We see it is on our credit card and home finance rates. We see it when we finance a car or check our 401K balance.
What is more difficult to comprehend is the damage Joe is doing on the international stage. The global impact is not so tangible, and you must look behind the curtains. When you do, you will not like what you see and why he has the lowest approval ratings of any modern-day President.
We see the endless money stream flowing to Ukraine like oil through a pipeline. We know much of that money is being skimmed, and some may even find its way into Biden LLC accounts. We know that China and Russia each pull the strings of the Biden puppet. You will never hear Biden call out China on human rights violations with the Uighurs or demand they stop manufacturing raw Fentanyl made into tablets in Mexico, killing our younger population in Small Towne America. But what is happening with Iran is very subtle, but the entire Administration is covering it up.
First, there is the $6 Billion that the Trump Administration had frozen. Biden unfroze the funds to sweeten the five-for-five prisoner swap in September. Biden and his staff swore the funds could only be used for humanitarian purposes, but Iran said it was their money and they would use it any way they wanted. There were reports yesterday that Biden finally refroze the funds. This action will be a sticking point when we begin negotiations to get our hostages back from Hamas.
Next was the sanctions placed on oil sales by Iran. Biden’s team swears they did not relax restrictions, but how do you explain 400,000 barrels produced in 2020 when we had sanctions and 4 million barrels per day now. Iran has used oil to enrich its balance sheet by over $50 billion. This could not have been accomplished with the sanctions in place and enforced. To say otherwise is a lie and insulting to the American people. Biden’s approach to Iran is very reminiscent of his approach to China. Truth and can never be pointed out for fear you offend a foe.
Whether Hamas out of Gaza or Hezbollah out of Lebanon, neither of these groups would have dared pull off this slap at America and the world without Iran’s blessing. The world is convinced that eliminating Hamas and Hezbollah without cutting off the head (Iran) is fruitless. The conflict is less than a week old, and protests against Israel are increasing globally. Criticism by the media about Israeli military tactics fills the airwaves, as are demands to turn on the water and electricity in Gaza. The world has gone soft and will not have the stomach to witness an urban battle necessary for Israel to satisfy its objective. There will be collateral damage, and that is unacceptable to many. It is a shame these same people were not so vocal when word of children beheaded or entire families left to burn alive in fiery buildings set ablaze by Hamas. War is ugly, and this will be no exception, but we must remind the critics that Hamas threw the first stone, and Israel deserves the right to throw the second. And let’s not forget the dead and captured Americans. Where are our actions to balance those actions?
The post What Does Iran Have On Joe appeared first on Granite Grok.
I met a lot of people at the Leadership Summit who were planning to come to Groktoberfest but had not yet purchased tickets. As we near the event date, I’d like to remind you that there’s no discount for waiting, and we’d like to know how much fun we can expect to have with readers, fans, friends, and family.
That’s a polite way of saying, if you can make it to this oversized GrokMeet, please buy your tickets this week. You can use the QR or the embedded form below – both of which are easier to navigate than the event page (Not a dig on the ticketing platform; it’s just a fact).
Support Independent Media – Please Scan the QR Code or Use the embedded form to get your tickets to Groktoberfest!
DonorboxEventWidget.embed({container: 'donorboxEmbed',embedFormSlug: 'https://donorbox.org/embed_event/504084'});
As a reminder, DonorBox might tell you this is a tax-deductible expense or donation, but that is not correct, and I have been unable to change that note. The ticket price pays for the event costs, and any remaining money supports GraniteGrok. Speakers and helpers are all volunteers. Our goal is to heighten awareness of our new circumstances. A paid staff member for whom we are raising a salary (that’s for me) and what we hope to accomplish with those dollars with a full-time dedicated Grokster. Taking GraniteGrok to the next, NEXT level.
We encourage you to get a ticket and come hang out with us for a few hours and then support us however you can. Read more, click more, visit our ad sponsors, donate online, or become a subscribing monthly donor. Or become a sponsor.
Free Speech Sponsor $100 VIP access* for a year for one email address when the service becomes available. Free Speech Guardian $500 VIP access*, and a Month of Promotional/ad space on Granite Grok. Free Speech Champion $1000.00+ Free Speech Patron $5000.00+ Something larger in mind, reach out to us please.
Or just get a ticket and come hang out with us. Meet Corey Lewandowski, Dan Richards, Hal Shurtleff, Skip, and Myself, hang with some Groksters, local groups, and activists, but this is not a candidate event. No candidates are speaking, but they are welcome to attend and mingle, and you can talk about whatever you like. We won’t stop you.
Ian and Jody Underwood will be selling books, and we can listen to some music.
And we have a gun raffle (Ruger 10-22).
Note: at least a few folks said they could not make it but are buying a ticket anyway to support us. Thank you for that; we wish you could join us! And we’ll see everyone else on the 28th, 1-4 pm.
Location: The Londonderry Fish and Game Club
5 Lund St, Litchfield, NH 03052
+These levels of support are needed and welcome; we can’t reach our goal without them. If this is you, please contact us directly.
You can also support us by placing ads on the site—email steve@granitegrok.com for rates and options.
The post Reminder – Groktoberfest is Less than Two Weeks Away appeared first on Granite Grok.
Years ago, story after story would appear stemming from the developing “outlook” of what Social Work Graduate Schools were demanding their graduates adopt. They kept throwing out students who were either Conservative, Christian, or both, or just not hewing to the Narrative of how the world was to be seen and dealt with by these newly minted graduates.
Some were within months or even weeks of graduating but were being told, “Sorry that you just wasted two years of your lives, but we aren’t going to let you be one of us.” I was agape that most of these folks’ grades were perfectly fine – just that their beliefs didn’t match up with the professors.
Imagine being told, in effect, to “throw away your Christianity” simply to get a diploma. To have to lie to get that sheet of paper? Isn’t the current mantra of “LeftSpeak” “be your authentic self”? But they didn’t have the right “disposition” to be authentic social workers, according to the Leftard Professors who believed, seemingly across the nation all at once, that only people like them could be trusted to “serve the people.”
These folks were being true to themselves – and were getting rejected. It’s been this way, however, for decades. “Inclusion” seems to have a NewSpeak definition that has the unspoken undertones of “but only if you are one of us – we get to inclusively exclude you if you aren’t.” And do so without penalty or accountability.
So why do I bring up these three specific words? Because something rubbed me the wrong way – seemingly a “new” disposition?
Part of my four-month “hiatus,” at least an extremely good part of two months, was taking thirteen classes offered by UNH that were designed for DCYF to educate both Foster Parents and Residential/Group Home staff members (newbies as well as ongoing). Some were “gut” courses, some were rather rote (even if on materials that I’ve never seen before but seemed to be common sense), and a couple near the end required a lot of time, thinking, and writing—sixty hours of classes.
At the end of every class was a questionnaire that wanted to know what I thought of the class – and I certainly told them what I thought. However, one question was always present and near the end of each of these end-of-class surveys. While I failed to capture the survey pages (non-graded, so I didn’t bother), I should have. The question was (paraphrased) was:
Was this class taught in an inclusive, respectful, and equitable manner?
Huh? Say what? What is that question even trying to ask? Especially if most newly minting Foster Parents are just run-of-the-mill folks just wanting to open their homes to help kids in need and aren’t politically oriented like I am. I’m betting that they are wondering – huh? It’s only because much of my time is immersed in the viewpoints of the Left that I went, each and every time: WHY?
So for each instance the above question was asked, I answered pretty much with this:
Why are “inclusive” and “equitable” even being used here?? Doesn’t “respectful” cover it all? Isn’t that the ONLY word that is necessary in your question?
Now realize that almost every class I took was self-paced. A number were supposed to take two weeks to do, a couple were three, and three were four weeks in length. I would generally do a class in a day with the four-week ones in a day and a half. So, I finished early and then went back to dealing, full time, with the Granddaughter, the school folks trying to work with her, DCYF, and now a host of “other party” folks being brought in to see what is ticking, kinda ticking, off-beat ticking, or not ticking within her. There is a consensus that is starting to build from all that, but that will be grist for a later post.
My point is that I rarely had to interact with an instructor unless I ran into problems (like dead links to external materials, outdated material, and things that didn’t make sense unless one was already an insider). I would have thought, after making it clear that TMEW & I were newbies to all this, that my question about the use of inclusive and equitable would have been taken seriously. After all, that WAS their role as “fixers” for such issues that I brought up. One would have thought perhaps ONE of these 11 instructors (two oversaw two of my classes each) would have taken my question seriously.
Sadly, now. Now, TO BE SURE, unlike the poor social work students at the top of this post, none of my grades were dinged even if I started to let my “authentic self” out in my answers. I had one 89% grade – all the others have been 100% with the exception of my last course (along with TMEW’s) for the title of Emergency Care Foster Parent – it is yet to be graded (due by 10/22).
Sidenote: I make no claim to be the smartest guy in any room – I’ve said for years that I’m just an ordinary schlub from Central New Hampsha; no better and no worse than anyone else. However, the one thing I’ve learned to do during my 40-year career in the computer industry IS to learn. Two STEM degrees and a whole FLOCK of technical certifications as technology changed and the companies I worked for said “Prove to use you’ve learned what we told you to do”. So, I know how to take tests and answer questions – that’s my “superpower” if I have any at all. I’m still just an ordinary guy…
So to that point (not dinged), at least there is still some intellectual honesty in the process. But it concerns me, 10-15 years down the line, that the Left’s outlook is sneaking into this kind of education in a matter-of-fact process: “Hey, this is normal – why are you complaining? WE are the experts, right?”. It is assumed that one is Woke to be able to answer the mandatory question (yes, I tried to leave it blank – they made it a mandatory answer text field).
It’s the institutional capture we’ve been dealing with all these decades: you are expected to accept our language.
All I wish, however, that ONE, just ONE, would have answered my question and leveled with me HOW inclusive and equitable were to be seen.
The post Was This Class Taught in an Inclusive, Respectful, and Equitable Manner? appeared first on Granite Grok.
If White Guilt needed a poster Girl, there are many from whom to choose, but if you don’t feel like looking, Leah Stokes fits the bill. She is the senior author of a paper funded by pro-wind-energy concerns titled “Prevalence and predictors of wind energy opposition in North America.”
Put down any beverage before you read this.
In the United States, opposition was more likely and more intense in areas with a higher proportion of White people, and a lower proportion of Hispanic people; in Canada, the same pattern held for wealthier communities. The names in articles associated with US opposition were overwhelmingly likely to be White. This suggests an environmental justice challenge we term “energy privilege,” wherein the delay and cancellation of clean energy in wealthier, Whiter communities leads to continued pollution in poorer communities, and communities of color.
Leah needs ot have a sit down and chat with Greta ‘How Dare You’ Thunberg. Muppet Greta led a protest opposing a wind project development in indigenous areas earlier this year. Something she called Climate Colonialism. I quickly pointed out how green-energy privilege leveraged as liberal privilege to create energy privilege was already ruining the lives of “indigenous populations” and their local environments.
Nearly everything “green” has CCP fingerprints on it. China owns many of the mines in Africa and South East Asia, where local low-wage or slave-level laborers work in criminally unhealthy conditions with massive environmentally damaging footprints. Not the fake damage used to sell the agenda but real, generational harm with long-term impacts on human health, land, water, and wildlife.
Can we expect Thunberg to visit the Congo, Indonesia, or the Mother Ship in China? What about CCP climate ‘colonialism’ and human rights violations? Will Greta stand before the UN and say, “How Dare You” support an energy transition under these circumstances?
And what about the rest of it? I mean, all of it. Are all the groups milking the colonialism schtick going to shoot their narrative or climate cash cows because the NWO energy transition depends on climate change colonialism and the harmful offshoring of emissions to third-world nations for the benefit of wealthy globalists?
It is a fine thing for Leah to collect data on wind energy development. Still, perhaps she should consider “whose land” they might be burying the unrecyclable bits from decommissioned wind turbines. Or how the planned exponential increase in the cost of electricity makes everything, not just electricity, cost more, and how that harms the poor minority first and most often?
That expanding domestic fossil fuel development in the US lowered the cost of living and improved the quality of life for tens of millions when the economic recovery that followed created jobs and increased wages for women, blacks, Hispanics, and teens to record levels.
Finally, that allowed to proliferate the economic and environmental cost of the rapid deployment of wind or solar is a) emissions offshoring to mines in third-world countries while China builds most of the green tech with dirty coal power, b) detrimental to the economic and national security of the West – putting more vulnerable people at risk, and c) would shift a significant portion of the middle class, including all people, below the poverty line.
So what if, maybe, these white people get all that and are doing themselves and, by extension, poorer communities a favor you are ideologically incapable of seeing?
The post White Guilt Wind appeared first on Granite Grok.
How much longer must we suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous misfortune from the political party that hates this country and hates us? You know, those of us who continue to do the difficult work of feeding, fueling, and defending this nation while the Hate America Party calls us racist, sexist, binary Neanderthals and climate deniers.
We want to thank Russ Wiles for this Op-Ed. If you have an Op-Ed or LTE
you would like us to consider, please submit it to Editor@GraniteGrok.com.
I am talking about the party that hates babies so much that they want abortion untethered to any limits whatsoever. The party that empowers criminals to terrorize us, even as some leftists have been targeted while outside their gated communities. Most GOP members act as though they have no idea that we are in a deadly game of survival with the party that embraces Marxism, the way toddlers cling to their teddy bears.
Dan Bongino is correct about fighting back, as if our life and liberty depend on it because it does. Kurt Schlichter is correct that we must vote out of office anyone who is unwilling to lock up criminals, deport foreigners here illegally, fire government flunkies, cut off funds to commie colleges, and demand that corporations decide if they want us as friends or enemies.
Frederick Douglass and Martin Luther King Jr. yearned for a color-blind society with a focus on the content of character rather than the color of one’s skin. Yet, the Marxist Hate America Democrat Party now embraces the Southern Poverty Law Center’s recent slogan – “Colorblindness: The New Racism?”
As Dennis Prager notes, “the left generally holds the Constitution in contempt — at the very least, as a slavery-defending document.” The Democrat Party is on board with that notion. Where do you stand?
The post When Will Republicans Stand Up to the Party That Hates America? appeared first on Granite Grok.
When you show up at large events with mostly like-minded people in a state the size of New Hampshire, you will see people you know. If you write for GraniteGrok, some will know your work. The odds that they will not all love it seem likely, which is a good sign. We’re not monolithic bots. Debate is good.
But sometimes, people feel it is better to walk away and avoid debate either becasue they can’t support their position or, let’s be kind, they’d rather not say some unkind words. I’m unsure which this was, but he was not interested in talking to me. While mingling in the midst of several people, I knew this additional individual was introduced with the common, you know Steve MacDonald, don’t you? From GraniteGrok.
That last part appears to have been a problem. After a weak handshake and a look that went from ‘Hello stranger’ to, I know you (but not really), I was told we (GraniteGrok) should stick to calling out Democrats and that I cost Republicans votes. He was not a fan of what I called our very big woodshed with room for anybody.
As he turned and walked away, I asked if he’d write an op-ed making his case and that I’d publish it, but he wasn’t having any of that. I sensed that short of being the NHGOP’s MSNBC, there was no pleasing him. I shrugged, filed it away in what passes for my brain, and returned to the conversation I’d been having.
And here we are.
Does GraniteGrok cost Republicans votes? Not nearly as many as Republicans do, but the two things are related.
While we have painted the odd GOP candidate in a less-than-favorable light, the why is more important than the how. Politicians and activists, as a class, get filtered through the same lens. NH Constitution, US Constitution, Party platform, and the idea that limiting government is the purpose for which we elect representation.
I get that deal-making is required to move the ball down the field and that sometimes you need to put some points on the board, but if no one reminds anyone why, they increasingly score goals for the other team, maybe without even realizing it. Or, we score goals so they can claim some accomplishment in time for the next election, even when that achievement chips away at natural rights and liberties.
The other – more important issue – is that a member of a private club (the GOP) who feels no requirement to uphold the club charter is less likely to heed their oath of office. If the oath has soft edges, so do the laws those members create. They make excuses for inaction or failing to reign in abuses. The club that got them there takes a back seat to a ruling class club, and at the far end of this path stands many a Democrat for whom the law is a thing to manage society. The Constitution enacted to prevent these abuses becomes less a road map and more a barrier.
Elected office becomes more about what political power can do for them, not how they might use their influence to restrain it.
Yes, we target wayward Republicans, and we won’t always get that right. And not every author agrees with every other on every issue or even how to approach it. We agree that creeping tyranny is a problem, and it is not limited to Democrats. That limited government is always better. And that there is plenty of room in the woodshed.
We are not the GOP’s MSNBC. You won’t get flowery praise for half-measures. If you disagree, we’ll happily publish any defense of your position, but you have to defend it and then send it, or that won’t happen. And not just 300 words but 600 or more. All you have to do is take us up on the offer. You’ll get front-page access, just like the rest of us.
Or you can walk away, but we’ll still be here.
The post At Least One Person Was Not Happy to See Me at the NHGOP Leadership Summit appeared first on Granite Grok.
There were so many important voices during the Revolution that founded our great country. Politicians, Lawyers, Doctors, and, of course, Clergymen! In fact, the brightest stars of the Revolution were the voices of ardent clergymen whose hearts set on freedom for all men and whose tongues were swords of truth to set the captives free!
One Pastor who was an outstanding leader and motivator for freedom was the Reverend John Wise, who was the Pastor of a congregational church in Chebacco Parish in the southeastern part of Ipswich, Massachusetts.
Many people know that Thomas Jefferson drafted the Declaration of Independence, and of course, Jefferson was brilliant on so many levels. But he drew his revolutionary concepts and ideas from a source not often credited with that Declaration. The ideas came from the pen and the pulpit of the Reverend John Wise. He was the first son of an indentured servant to graduate from the prestigious Harvard University. He was a forceful preacher, a community leader, and a fluent and provocative writer.
He was often at odds with government officials. In 1687, the New England governor, Sir Edmund Andros, at the command of King James II, without consent of the legislative body, levied a tax upon the citizens. Pastor Wise took to action swiftly and sounded the alarm that Tyranny was at hand! Pastor Wise roused the people of his community and others to oppose the tax. Well, guess what? The Governor had him arrested! He brought him before a crown-friendly jury and royalist judges, and he so angered them by his defense that they threatened to sell him as a slave. He was suspended from his ministry and fined. However, he did not stop preaching against tyranny.
A year later, Governor Andros was deposed, and Pastor Wise was vindicated. Wise was very forward-thinking and was able to communicate in print and speech some of the great foundational truths of the Declaration of Independence, a few examples are listed:
As a writer, he penned two important works that the founders read and that fanned the flames of the Revolution. After his death, the reprinting of his books quickly sold out and was reprinted again. His two most famous works are: “The Churches Quarrel Espoused.” and “A Vindication of the Government of New England Churches.”
His stature was tall, and he was considered a very rough man physically. He is depicted as muscular and a formidable wrestler! The story told that he was challenged by Andover’s champion wrestler, Cape. John Chandler. Wise refused at first sighting his age, i.e., being too old and infirm. But the Captain was persistent and prevailed. In a makeshift ring, Captain Chandler grappled with the elderly Pastor. Wise promptly threw him completely over the wall/fence. Captain Chandler got up, shook himself off, and proclaimed that he would be on his way as soon as the preacher threw his horse over after him!
Finally, Cornell University historian Clinton Rossiter, in his great book, “Seedtime of the Republic,” traces six individuals that he considers the most influential thought leaders of the American Revolution. In his estimation, two were political leaders, but four were ministers of the gospel, and of course, Pastor John Wise was named among these great leaders.
Until next week!
Pastor Allen
The post Pulpit Polity – One of Thomas Jefferson’s Revolutionary Inspirations appeared first on Granite Grok.
This is both funny and, well, funny – if you are not one of these people, trapped between the contradictions of the progressive narrative mill and a hard place.
A comedic performance of what it might be like to be an actor who has to pick a side to save his career becasue he has to post something on social media, but there’s so damn much to consider. And here he is considering it.
Watch as he explores all the factors, seeks advice, and …
Actor Not Sure if He’s Supposed to Support Israel or Palestine pic.twitter.com/X3UDB8HWPI
— Ryan Long (@ryanlongcomedy) October 12, 2023
The post “Actor” Needs Help – Not Sure if He’s Supposed to Support Israel or ‘Palestine’ appeared first on Granite Grok.
There was a discussion about an outside agency coming in to “train” students of all grades in “Social and Emotional Learning” at a particular NH-based School District. What concerned folks was its progressive word-salad mission statement (shared below).
And (also of concern) that our Federal and State Government Executive Branches often exceed their statutory authority as written by our elected representatives (and SCOTUS has started a determined effort to rebuff and constrain bureaucracies back into the legal limits set by duly written and passed laws), this is appropriate:
“Acceptance and inclusion” means you must tolerate boys competing in girls’ sports and accept the loss of your parental rights. I voted no on adding SEL to our Definition of Student Success when I was on the School Board. I was the only 1 of 7 to vote No. Divine Right of Bureaucrats is NOT an acceptable substitute for Divine Right of Kings. Free people reject both.
We should reject it all, but we are living in a neo-aristocracy that is often best shown when we bump up against “Left captured” agencies and subdivisions-of-the-State. Many people take Government at face value and accept, pretty much, what it says. This is counter to our Founding when Americans, highly skeptical of government, knew it would develop its own special interests and move away from serving citizens to serving itself.
Doubt me?
WHY, then, has it been so easy for me to publish story after story coming out of the Public (Government) School system where staff members are doing exactly what I just said?
SEL -> Social and Emotional Learning. Time spent on that is NOT time spent on base academics. There can be no objective measures for SEL lessons – and this shows, to me, at least, that they no longer care about standardized testing that allows parents to determine how well their employees are fulfilling their jobs.
And remember, the Left has redefined “Inclusion” to be “we’ll include anyone into our clique as long as you agree with us. Otherwise, our definition of “inclusion” means we can exclude anyone that doesn’t. Like all of their other re-definitions, this tremendously skews any discussion and argument to their premises.
“Acceptance” means “You WILL accept what you are told to believe and told how to behave. Otherwise, there will be repercussions that you won’t like” which will be a cross between the old style of shunning and Mao’s Red Guard’s “struggle session” in which you will learn to love Big Brother. “1984” was meant to be a warning, not a How-To manual.
Here is that Mission Statement:
The Browne Center works with a variety of youth and student populations to promote learning and personal growth in participants.
Our programs consist of a customized sequence of experiential activities that foster individual and team growth. In an environment that is fun, safe, and respectful, our programs also provide opportunities for participants to make positive choices, gain self-confidence, and learn skills that are critical to their development.
With a long history of working with schools, The Browne Center has developed a year-long in-school Social and Emotional Learning curriculum.
Whether a year-long implementation or a “peak day” at The Browne Center challenge course, our programs enhance skills in:
Youth & Student Programs Overview [PDF]
Common outcomes for our youth participants include:
It all sounds “nice”, doesn’t it? As opposed to doing pre-calculus, Physics II, Chemistry, Civics, and American History….
Does any of this speak to our Founding Principles beneath the flowing, smooth verbiage?
The post We Did Not Swap One for Another – We Have Fought for Our Freedom! appeared first on Granite Grok.
Recent data from the Pew Research Center shows that from 1994 to 2022, Americans’ views of opposing political parties became increasingly negative. In 1994, only 21 percent of Republicans and 17 percent of Democrats held “very unfavorable” views of the other party. In 2022, that category rose to 62 percent for Republicans and 54 percent for Democrats. If we include those who hold “unfavorable” views, then over 80 percent of both Republicans and Democrats have negative views of the other party.
One of the many undesirable effects of this polarization is an environment in which anything can become a political lightning rod. Whether it involves Dr. Seuss books, Mr. Potato Head, or the Barbie movie, controversy seems to lurk around every societal corner. Nothing is safe, nothing is sacred, and anything can be weaponized by one political factor against another. The term often used to describe this perpetual conflict is “culture war”—a depressingly apt term. But through all the angry tweets, op-eds, and “cancel” campaigns, few ask about where these culture wars come from and whether we can end them.
While a complex social event is never the product of just one factor, culture wars generally emerge from one group of people using some form of power to pressure another group into changing its beliefs or behavior. The pressured group may fight back and cause the pressuring group to redouble its efforts. This cycle, if it continues, can broaden into a full-blown culture war.
What does this dynamic look like in practice? Imagine a country where a group of ice cream fanatics decide to make every citizen eat more ice cream. They might try to pass legislation that favors eating ice cream, attack and shame ice cream skeptics, and encourage eating ice cream as a social norm. They would probably win converts, but they would also make enemies (especially the lactose intolerant!). Those who do not wish to eat ice cream would react negatively and maybe try to push an anti–ice cream agenda. Soon, an ice cream culture war could break out, each side pressuring the other to conform to its beliefs.
The catalyst of a culture war is the pressure exerted by one group on another to adopt its ways of thinking and acting. But why do groups elect to use force on others to spread their viewpoints? Prima facie, there is no strong incentive to resort to aggressive evangelism. Societies are built through cooperation, even between those who disagree. The baker sells his bread to members of his political party as well as the opposing party. If he sold bread only to customers who adopted his political beliefs, the market would turn on him. The same incentive to cooperate exists for groups motivated by ideology. While it is certainly in their interest to add to their ranks, doing so in an aggressive and forceful manner is likely to work against them.
The state does not obey the same social norms as its citizens; its injunctions are not optional but coercive in nature. More importantly, such coercion (e.g., taxation, legislation, and law enforcement) does not exist in a vacuum but aims to achieve various ends. Interest groups looking to spread their beliefs can redirect state power to their own purposes. This may involve anything from getting a subsidy for an ideologically friendly company to using state-enforced censorship against ideological enemies.
As the power and reach of a state grows, so too do the opportunities to direct that power. In terms of total spending, the federal government of the United States is the largest in history. It is no coincidence that now, when the power of the state is greater than ever, culture wars are raging all around us. These conflicts are occurring not because people are deciding to fight with one another but because they are compelled to. If there were only free and voluntary associations, then alternative beliefs could coexist. There would be no need to promote, for example, one lifestyle over another, because everyone could live how they see fit.
But state power removes all choice and variety. As the state increases its control over domains like public school curricula and corporate subsidies, fewer ideas and directions are given a chance to succeed. Culture wars fester within such narrowing policy confines because values and beliefs are either represented or excluded.
Conflicts instigated through state power always spill into other areas of society. When the political representation or exclusion of one’s beliefs is at stake, a culture war can become an environment in which any means of defense seems fair game. Social institutions, corporations, and popular media can all be weaponized and wielded against one’s enemies. The result is as familiar as it is exhausting: unending conflict and controversy, with every institution, organization, and event in society politicized and nowhere to hide from the unceasing cross fire.
Culture wars are not created solely by the state, but a state with too much power makes them inevitable. High-minded sentiments about “having conversations” and “understanding the beliefs of others” might sound like appealing options for cooling the tensions of a culture war, but they gravely underestimate the scope of the problem. No amount of civil discussion will remove the divisions created by state power. Until that power is destroyed—or, at the very least, greatly diminished—the culture wars will continue.
J.W. Rich is an economics student and writer in Charlotte, North Carolina. You can find his other writings on his blog at thejwrich.medium.com.
JW Rich | Mises Wire
Mises Wire We heartily encourage reprints and shares of Mises Wire articles. If you wish to reproduce an article in your blog, magazine, radio show, newspaper column, classroom material, textbook, discussion group, website, or any other venue, please do so. The original publication source must be included in an appropriate place.The post Government Is the Hidden Hand Directing the Culture Wars appeared first on Granite Grok.
Perhaps Ron DeSantis’ campaign would NOT have nosedived IF he had answered questions about UKRAINE and J6 like this. Instead, we have gotten platitudes on these two defining issues.
Pledges to “end the weaponization of government” CANNOT be taken seriously if you are NOT willing to say that what has happened …and is continuing to happen … to nonviolent J6 protesters is un-American and evil AND that you are going to do something about it.
I will pardon *all* Americans who were targets of politicized federal prosecutions & those who were denied due process – this includes all nonviolent Jan 6 protesters like @BrandonStraka & those who were denied their constitutional due process rights. It is un-American for the… pic.twitter.com/TqyVUPAvar
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) October 14, 2023
The post Vivek Hits It Out Of the Park At NHGOP’s FITN-Summit appeared first on Granite Grok.
Last week, while eulogizing the collapse of another hurricane season – during a super hot summer narrative season – I hinted at the latest caterwauling by the climate cult. OMG, September was so darn hot; it’s a record. Hardly.
But, but September’s temperature anomaly, you say, yes, it looks like a hockey stick, and we know how much the Cult loves those when they feed the proper narratives.
That’s a thing, ain’t it? Despite the lack of satellite data prior to 1979, one might be willing to accept the super-hot-September narrative without question. Many have and will and do, but they’d be jumping to conclusions.
Locally, the US anomaly was pedestrian at best.
A different look here: this is the three-month anomaly for the contiguous US. Not only was this summer, not the hottest (last year was hotter), but the summer of 1936 had a greater anomaly than any other year in the record, and none of that excess CO2 we are told is going to mean our end. The only thing scary is how natural and cyclical this record looks absent the Climate Cult narrative bias.
And?
This is all NOAA’s data, and NOAA is run by NASA, which means it is NASA data, and this isn’t exactly friendly to anyone who is not a card-carrying member of the Climate Cult.
But, but Global temperatures, they’ll cry – when the data winks at them and shows a little leg. When things are going the other way, as they have been for over a decade, there’s nothing to see.
Put differently, the climate is a series of years, decades, and sometimes centuries of trending that can’t be captured in one month or even three. The data we have is not even a wink in the history of Earth’s climate, which the secularists of scientism will remind us is older than the Bible claims. True dat, but so is the climate record, and it is not favorable to the approved cult narrative.
The current trend continues to be hospitable to life on earth but is more likely to get colder, making it less so while the Progs and their Green Army of idiots are working double-time to make getting warm nearly impossible.
Note: Steve Milloy has a relevant Summer/ 2023 Climate Facts PDF with more details, including on September 2023, here, if you are interested.
The post Temperature Anomaly Voodoo and The Scorching Hot September Narrative appeared first on Granite Grok.
Every time Congress decides to “debate” whether or not to give themselves a raise, they try to do it in secret because it’s a very unpopular move, for obvious reasons.
Whenever I hear that, I think of an alternative deal. The critters make $174K a year, which is about three times the average wages of the people who pay their salary.
The problem is that whenever these critters get together, their antics cost the taxpayers even more.
So, I have a modest proposal. If the critters want to grant themselves a $10k raise, I say give them a $50k raise, but only on the condition that they stay home and not “govern” us.
The problem, for us, is that they can make much, much more than that by not staying home. Feinstein died with a net worth of over $100 million. Pelosi has more than $100 million. There are others, in all parties, that have figured out how to milk the system for far more than their meager salary.
Consider the recent funding of Ukraine—hundreds of billions sent there with no accountability. Certainly, much of that has come back to members of Congress and their enablers in the military-industrial complex.
What if, instead, we officially recognized the obvious corruption and paid each member of Congress $100 million to go away? “OK, guys, you won. Take your winnings and go home. And never come back again.”
Let’s look at the economics.
Four hundred thirty-five members of the House and 100 members of the Senate. None Supreme Court justices, the President and Vice President. Five hundred forty-six hungry, corrupt mouths to feed. $100 million each is only $54.6 billion.
That’s less than half of the $113 billion that has been sent just to Ukraine in the last two years. Add that to the billions (trillions?) given to big pharma, big agriculture, big tech, and a thousand others.
And you can bet that there will be billions more sent to Israel as that certainly will become the darling of the military-industrial complex in the coming weeks and months.
So, I think giving every elected critter in Washington $100 million would be quite a bargain as long as they take the money and go away.
But what about the rent-seeking lobbyists? I mean, they bought these Representatives and Senators with their hard-earned (cough!) money. What will they get from my plan?
Well, that’s going to be between the critters and their enablers. The windfall that the critters would have received will have to be shared with their lobbyist enablers.
Maybe, in the spirit of transparency that my proposal would require, all lobbyist donors would be mandated to submit invoices to their beneficiaries detailing their contributions and demanding restitution, which would include principal, plus interest, plus a return that they expected on their investment.
Everyone wins. No more sneaking around with code words like Pedo Pete and “The Big Guy.” No more pretending that “we’re making the world safe for democracy.” No more lies about “you can keep your doctor,” “Yellowcake,” or “They hate us for our freedoms.” Plus a thousand others.
We all know the system is corrupt. Instead of dancing around trying to pretend everything is on the up-and-up, let’s just admit the bastards beat us and pay them to go away.
We’ll all be better off in the long run.
The post “A Modest Proposal” appeared first on Granite Grok.
It is not often that an entire city reaches such a level of decay that it deserves to be entirely razed to the ground, removed from existence. Sodom and Gomorrah are the pivotal examples in history that were destroyed by hellfire.
Whether that meant a natural disaster, an attack by an extraterrestrial force, or some sort of Earth-based warfare is up to your interpretation of historical accounts in the texts. Those cities hypothesized to have existed on the southern coast of the Dead Sea or thereabouts no longer exist.
“Ye shall know them by their fruits,” goes the biblical maxim. And what are the fruits of Gaza? Terrorism, plain and simple. A manifestation of pure evil. Last weekend, religious zealots spilled over the 1950 Armistice Agreement Line and went on an orgy of death. What followed has been widely discussed as to what actually happened. The details are unspeakably despicable and revolting to a good, upstanding citizen. The fact that so many are willing to engage in conversation about whether or not children were beheaded is a clear exhibit of the shocking moral decay of the entire English-speaking world.
The kneejerk response of some political figures and even student groups was to celebrate Hamas and affirm the Palestinian people’s right to resist their occupation. How stupid are these people? In cities across Europe and North America, Muslims held public rallies to support Hamas. The blowback has only begun. There is a simmering rage that is patiently waiting to unleash righteous justice.
Yes, Palestine has been oppressed, and at some points in the years since the establishment of the state of Israel, the citizens of Gaza have been treated like caged animals, confined to a narrow strip of land. But that was in May of 1948, now nearly 75 years ago. In all of that time, the Palestinian people have succeeded in two very distinct outcomes that define their present reality: (1) They have served as a breeding ground and civilian shield for Islamic fundamentalists’ war against Israel, and (2) They have utterly failed to build a functioning government or establish legitimacy as an actual state in the international community.
How long does it take a people to successfully build a government to represent themselves? I ask with astonishment. There are many governments that have successfully been formed and joined the international community since 1948, the date of Israel’s creation. That list includes every modern country in Africa (except Ethiopia, Morocco, Liberia, and South Africa), many Caribbean island nation-states, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Malaysia, Maldives, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Fiji. South Sudan, for example, became a successful independent state with a functioning government as recently as 2011. So, why do Israel and Palestine continue with their ridiculous two-state solution featuring a splintered Palestinian state across two geographically distinct territories— Gaza and the West Bank?
I offer you a perspective on the situation. Take the position that Israel-Palestine is one state. The main power centers are Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Gaza has been denied or failed to create a functioning government— see the causes for that as you like. The reality is that the government of Israel has total power and control over Gaza and the West Bank. Those territories and the people in them exist at the mercy of the Israeli government. That also means that Israel can de facto control when and how it engages with Gaza.
In the past decade or so, the IDF’s incursions into Gaza have been limited in scale, temporary in duration, and intended to be incisive so as to root out anti-Israeli militants. They were justified by the reality that militias, many Iran-backed, were constantly and regularly firing rockets into Israeli territory, typically haphazardly at civilians. Gaza was little more than a base for violent anti-Israeli jihadist militias. What country in its right mind would allow such a constant threat to exist directly on its border?
If you consider Israel-Palestine to be a single entity, then the socioeconomic structuring of the population is fractured and essentially two-class. Israelis are in a superior position, with Palestinians severely disadvantaged with those in Gaza the most disadvantaged. The real result of this situation has become that Gaza is a power lever for Israel that enables its incredible influence over world events. The globalization of the Islamic community and the spread of sympathy for the plight of the Palestinian people has made this situation such that there are groups of Palestinians, Palestinian sympathizers, and outright Islamic jihadists in cities across Europe and North America and in other urban centers in the Mideast and Asia as well.
When Israel acts with any force against Gaza in retaliation for the monthly barrages of rockets, there is protest and outcry. The Palestinians have won the hearts and minds of many on the political left worldwide. The situation in Gaza is a lever of power that can turn on globalized rage and outcry against injustice, colonialism, and state brutality. This is in the terms of the political left. Gaza is a time bomb.
To prevent further escalations of conflict and to defuse the situation entirely, there is one absolute way. That is to totally destroy Gaza and relocate any civilians there who are actually peaceful civilians. They can move to Egypt, Saudi, Jordan, Lebanon, or even the West Bank. Anywhere. But this is one solution that is painfully clear: Gaza does not deserve to exist.
Gaza has not negotiated for itself a functioning government or territorial integrity. It is barely able to maintain its own sovereignty, if it has any, it is a stretch to acknowledge. And it insists on continuing as a shield for jihadists whose main goal in life is to kill Israelis.
This is a proposed solution that is harsh, but life is harsh. Reality is harsh. Gaza is a tumor on global civil society. When it is pressed, it creates pain and anguish all over the world. It is a decaying city with outdated infrastructure and little chance to ever stand on its own as a prospering state.
The current global environment is perfect for refugees. They can walk across the US-Mexico border and get a free iPhone, paid luxury hotel for several months, and free US citizenship. They can do the same in many European countries and many Arabic countries, too.
Palestine can be the West Bank, and that would be a massive step forward for peace in the Mideast.
Just get rid of Gaza.
The post The Case for Razing Gaza appeared first on Granite Grok.
If you are not familiar with Aaron Day, he’s a serial entrepreneur who is running for President. And while that may look like a long shot, he’s still got a lot of critically important knowledge to share that is worth our time ad attention.
We’ve known Aaron for a while. He is something of a fixture among the grassroots and within the Liberty Alliance. He also has a unique understanding of the dangers of Centralized Digital Currency. He sat down with Jan Jekielek for Epoch TV to discuss it, and while it is nearly an hour long, I think you should watch it.
We can’t share it here, but you can watch it at the Epoch Times, and I’ve got a few snippets from the transcript to entice you to do exactly that.
Aaron begins by talking bout how he got here, the businesses he started – and how the government kept intervening to wreck them. It gives you some insight into his mindset and approach to problem-solving. His embrace of Bitcoin and digital currency and how that led to exploring government control of currency and by extension, human activity.
I’m focused on CBDC as somebody that’s a proponent of liberty and has moved to New Hampshire because of my libertarian values. I see central bank digital currency as the single biggest threat to human liberty. It is the gateway to everything that you just described. Once your money can be monitored, controlled, and censored by the government, that ties into social credit systems, vaccine passports, and digital IDs. That is the plan. This is something that’s actually been worked on. We are 50 years into a plan to push for a one world, global, technocratic form of government with this level of top-down control.
…
No, free countries weren’t thinking about this. About 20 countries were looking at exploring this in 2020. It’s now 2023 and 130 countries are exploring CBDC, and 20 countries will have implemented a CBDC by the end of this year. Over a billion people on this planet will be using a CBDC by the end of this year. What’s more alarming is that the United States has actually conducted three pilots.
The official view that you will hear from the chairman of the Federal Reserve is, “We don’t know if we will be looking at this. We don’t know if we’re going to be seriously pursuing this.” The reality is they have conducted three successful pilots and they already have the technology needed to roll out a CBDC in the United States. That’s the discrepancy that we have.
And one more …
There are three pilots. The first one is a pilot called Project Hamilton. The MIT multimedia lab was involved in all three of these pilots. Interestingly, the guy that was the chair when these things were started had visited Epstein’s Island twice.
You can’t make this stuff up. It sounds like a conspiracy theory, but there it is. This MIT group has been involved in each of these projects. Project Hamilton is a retail central bank digital currency. That simply means this would be the replacement for what we consumers use on a day-to-day basis as cash.
They did a pilot from 2020 to 2022, and this pilot was able to handle 1.7 million transactions per second. I’ll tell you why that’s important. If you look at Visa, MasterCard, and now this FedNow thing, which I could talk about separately, the current, traditional financial system can do between 50,000 and 100,000 transactions per second.
This Hamilton Project pilot can do an order of magnitude more than the traditional financial system, and that technology is sitting on the shelf. In the conclusion they said, “While we have the technical details worked out, there’s still a few things we might want to tweak. The real next step is figuring out the legality of how to roll this out, and the marketing of how to get people to accept this.”
People can be complacent and say, “This will never happen in America. They don’t have the technology yet.” No, it’s literally on the shelf. Project Cedar was a wholesale CBDC pilot. This is basically a CBDC that’s used for banks to communicate with one another for larger transaction volumes and to do transactions across the border. That pilot was concluded.
There is another one that’s even more dystopian, which was why they gave it a bland name. It’s called the Regulated Liability Network. The idea behind that one is to create one ledger that tracks all CBDC transactions. It’s basically a way of consolidating and managing all transactions and all digital assets, whether they are CBDC or non-CBDC.
It has taken me a while to summarize all this. I’ll give you an example of what it means and why it’s important. Imagine a future where there is no more cash, and the only thing that you can use to make purchases is CBDC. For instance, you go to the Apple Store and use your CBDC to buy a computer, and now your computer is given a digital token.
That digital token is tracked on a ledger along with your CBDC purchase of that computer. If the government decides they don’t like something that you’ve said online, or if you have a social credit score like they have in China where you have dipped below a certain level, they can not only shut off access to your money, they can shut off access to your computer, because your assets are actually assigned digital IDs. That is what is being contemplated with the Regulated Liability Network.
You can watch the entire conversation here, after which you can consider yourself as about as up to speed on CBDC as you could. Feel free to thank Aaron when you see him.
The post Aaron Day on CBDC and The Dangers of Currency Control appeared first on Granite Grok.
It has been a week full of news about Iran’s Islamist Jew-hating-proxy Hamas’s massacring innocents within Israel. Acts of terrorism on the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War when the Arab countries of Jordan and Egypt attacked it.
Streaming out of the Gaza Strip (between Israel to the east and north, Egypt to the south, and the Mediterranean Sea to the west), they then retreated back into Gaza, showing their true colors; if they could, they would initiate Holocaust 2.0 immediately.
The week’s news has also had the effect of showing us who the Jew-Haters are around the world and here in NH (In NH, Dozens Gather To Defend Hamas While Hundreds Rally for Israel).
Of course, they are Progressives.
At the same time, Douglas insisted reports of mass Israeli civilian deaths at the hands of Hamas are untrue. No civilians were murdered in their homes, no hostages were taken by terrorists, and no 300 concertgoers were gunned down by terrorists using paragliders. There’s no documented evidence that those people are dead,”
Holocaust Deniers in the Service of Islam and Progressivism/Socialism.
Gaza, Gaza, so what is this place – Gaza? Here is a template (map) to review if or when you watch the news.
(click to embiggen)
One would think that given their size and population, they COULD have gone in the direction of “not much land, not much in the way of resources – so let’s go intellectual!” and maximized what they have. Instead, they’ve engaged in a fruitless and blinkered outlook that they can really succeed in killing all of the Jews (“from the river to the sea”) and conquer Israel in an Islamist Jihad.
HT | Visual Capitalist
The post With All This Talk About Gaza … appeared first on Granite Grok.