The Manchester Free Press

Friday • August 12 • 2022


Manchester, N.H.

Syndicate content
Ruminations of a New Hampshire Republican with decidedly libertarian leanings TypePad
Updated: 16 min 54 sec ago

Tennessee Legislature Passes COVID Rules Bill

Sun, 2021-10-31 10:58 +0000

The 21-page omnibus COVID-19 bill prohibits mandates.

The final bill said government entities cannot force private businesses to institute a mask mandate or COVID-19 vaccination mandate, and private businesses cannot take action against an employee for not receiving the vaccine and cannot compel an employee or visitor to show proof of vaccination.

“This is a reckless way to legislate” Sen. Jeff Yarbro, D-Nashville, said about the 1 a.m. vote on the measures. Yarbro was part of the Senate conference committee.

The bill allows an opt-out for music venues to allow for proof of vaccination instead of a negative COVID-19 test for admission.

The bill prevents government entities from requiring masks.

“We just passed the Covid protection bill in the House and Senate,” said Rep. Jason Zachary, R-Knoxville, who was part of the House conference committee. “Huge win for the people of Tennessee. Since it is almost 2:30am EST, I’ll provide an update in a few hours.”

Schools would need to go through an intricate process to require masks and only on a school-by-school basis, not district-wide.

A principal would need to request the action, and the state would need to have a health emergency declared along with a rolling 14-day average of 1,000 cases per 100,000 residents. In that case, a school could institute a 14-day mask mandate and would be required to provide children age 12 or older with an N95 mask, along with “age-appropriate” masks for children younger than 12.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Well, that didn't take long!

Sun, 2021-10-31 10:21 +0000

YouTube strikes again.  Censored: Let's Go Brandon.


Not to worry!  I've updated the original post to get the video from Rumble.  Click here, Let's Go Brandon, Featuring Tyson James & Chandler Crump, to listen.


Categories: Blogs, United States

An Australian Engineer Speaks Out - The Many Mysteries of Covid

Sat, 2021-10-30 16:08 +0000

Dr. Phil Greer asks "Why?" 

I've taken the liberty of republishing his article in full as he encourages:

  The purpose of this message
  I remember when one or two of my friends were telling me sometime in 2021 about the origins of the pandemic and the hidden dangers of the vaccines. I didn’t take them too seriously, thinking that they had gone a tad too far down the conspiratorial road.   However, out of a mixture of curiosity and duty to myself, I decided to do some research – with the view that I’d be able to determine that they’d been victims of too much-sensationalised information.   Given that I used to head up the R&D division of a $700-million organisation, and that I’ve managed a wide variety of literally hundreds of corporate projects, I figured that it was a challenge that I could take on. Also, given that I have an engineering PhD that has helped me think critically, and that I’m very much a “show me the facts” type of guy, I figured that it wouldn’t be difficult to put any and all crazy conspiracies to bed.   After all, the prevailing message was very clear and consistent from our politicians, health advisors, expert government bodies, the MSM (Mainstream Media) and other experts which was:   “Covid is a pandemic” “The vaccine is safe, developed in record time” “We need to be locked down and vaxxed for our safety.”   It was a major, global event, but it all seemed pretty simple. Conspiracy – I don’t think so!   What I hadn’t realised back in August 2021 was that I had stumbled upon something that was so conspiratorial, widespread and ingenious in terms of its dark intents it subsequently left me day after day moving from a point of uneasiness to being increasingly disturbed as a result of what I was uncovering.   In the process of getting to the bottom of the whole Covid/Vax thing I waded through more than 700 papers, videos, opinion pieces and articles. I talked to numerous medical professionals like nurses, doctors and paramedics, and I waded through data, LOTS OF IT. Perhaps most crucially, I did deep dives at the data behind the data that was bombarding us daily as gospel – which took a lot of digging. In the process I realised that very little, in fact almost nothing of significance that we were officially being told by the government or the MSM was remotely true. And not everyone that I talked to had the same story, so that led to more digging to get to the truth.   Anyhow, as time progressed I came upon such voluminous amounts of information that I decided to take time off work (which stretched to a whole month) – right in the process of building a new business that I’d planned to launch ahead of my 50th birthday; instead, I found myself devoting 18-hour days almost non-stop to get to the bottom of what became increasingly like a disaster movie.   At this point, let me say that I am NOT offering any advice. I’m NOT saying that everything that I’ve read, referenced or quoted will have complete accuracy. It would take years to check the contents and the veracity of every single data and information source; that is the nature of science and discovery.   I’ve decided to lay out this paper in the form of a series of Why? questions – since there are A LOT of things that did not make sense for me if the aims of our government leaders were looking out for their people.   I expect that much of the content in this document will need updating within literally one week of reading it, since the latest data that is coming from literally dozens of sources, including frontline workers and whistle-blowers, many of whom have sprung up during the pandemic. Almost none of this information is available from the heavily censored Fact Checking Big Tech, MSM or Big Pharma funded medical journals.   It’s worth stating that searches on Google – who has shares connected with Big Pharma, makes the task a little trickier since Google will ‘fact check’ things according to Google’s truth; alternative browsers such as DuckDuckGo can assist with this issue.   I appreciate that much of this content will likely seem far-fetched, fictional even, with opposing perspectives to the MSM, the political and government’s expert narrative that prevails – like it did to me when I first started off on the journey.   All that I would ask is that you keep an open mind and dig deeper into the facts behind the facts – without taking my word for anything that’s written here. I’d prefer it if you did your own research from credible, independent experts.   I’ve had this document reviewed by several senior medical practitioners who were each extremely well read and exceptionally knowledgeable regarding all things Covid.   I would also attest to the fact that Big Pharma is a brilliantly organised, highly connected trillion-dollar industry connected to Big Tech and advisory institutions – making it more difficult to determine the facts. However, voluminous amounts of good, credible information can be found if you are just able to follow the breadcrumbs and good neutral sources.   The Why? Questions   1. The Mysterious Disappearing Flu   1. Why is it that the official government number of influenza deaths in Australia in 2021 is ZERO, and that there has not been a single flu death recorded since April 2020? And that the number of previous flu deaths in Australia are coincidentally similar to the recorded Covid deaths?   2, Why is it that the number of Flu Cases (interestingly, whose symptoms are similar to Covid) in the US declined by 99.5 % during 2020? I’ve checked the figures from the official government web sites, since I at first thought that this was fake news.   2. Masks   1. Why is it that we must wear masks whenever mask manufacturers state that they provide no protection against Covid (and that they are Single use only)?   2. Why do governments insist on wearing masks, whenever the most comprehensive analysis of mask effectiveness from 65 publications and 44 experimental studies show that masks are actually HARMFUL to human health – with a range of negative aspects cited as being the following:   Increase in dead space volume Increase in breathing resistance Increase in blood carbon dioxide Decrease in blood oxygen saturation Increase in heart rate Decrease in cardiopulmonary capacity Feeling of exhaustion Increase in respiratory rate Difficulty breathing and shortness of breath Headache Dizziness Feeling of dampness and heat Drowsiness (qualitative neurological deficits) Decrease in empathy perception Impaired skin barrier function with acne, itching and skin lesions?   3. Why, when studies have been shown that wearing masks causes a range of harmful psychological and societal issues, does the government mandate the wearing of them?   3. PCR Test   1. Why are we using the PCR test to determine whether someone has Covid or not? The PCR test kits that are used in numerous countries have been found to be extremely unreliable from multiple studies and laboratory professionals; and also the PCR test kits used in many nations are purported to be unable to differentiate between Covid and influenza?   2. Why are we counting Covid cases at an amplification test cycle frequency in the testing kit that is very high, above levels recommended by Dr. Fauci, so that it produces significant numbers of false positives, leading to the assumption that Covid case numbers are significantly higher than they actually are? And why did the WHO sit on this information for months before going public?   3. Why are we using the PCR test to determine whether someone has Covid or not, when the inventor of the PCR test stated that the PCR test is not meant to be used as a diagnostic test and certainly not at the significantly elevated number of cycles that it is being used at – since it will produce erroneous results? 4. Vax Injuries and Deaths – what we’re not being told re the numbers   1. Why, if the vaccines are safe, are Australian nurses so concerned about what they are seeing in relation to vaccine injuries and deaths that they have started a site on Telegram called Frontline Workers Speak Out which in less than 2 weeks amassed over 38,000 subscribers and more than 80 whistle-blowers who have reported significant increases in both injuries post-jab, and deaths in both patients and staff?   2. Why are hundreds of Australian nurses and doctors from the above site coming forward? And why are thousands of frontline workers in many countries coming forward, at the risk of losing their careers in some cases, with claims that almost none of the injuries and deaths post-jab are being recorded as linked to the vaccine?   3. Why, if the vaccines are safe, was the Facebook page of America's ABC inundated with over 250,000 stories of vaccine related tragic injuries and deaths within the space of just 5 days -- when it asked for tragic unvaccinated Covid stories (before they removed the page)?   4. Why is it that we have not been told that from the US Medicare database (not available to the public) that 48,000 people died within 14-days of receiving their jab (which is multiple times the number shown in the VAERS (voluntary adverse events reporting system data)? (Of particular note is the fact that the Medicare database represents only 18.1 % of the US population, meaning that the real death numbers from the vax in this period only are more likely to conservatively be at least 200,000).   5. Why did Mr. John O’Looney, the owner of a family funeral business in Milton Keynes, UK, claim that whenever the vaccinations started to happen in bulk he saw a very significant rise in the number of deaths in the population, claiming that he was burying the dead at a rate he had never experienced previously and, after talking to many medical professionals and frontline workers, concluded that he was “dealing with murder victims”?   6. Why did the 45 undertakers in Mr. O’Looney’s regional area also say that they could scarcely keep up with the rate of burials, and why would Mr. O’Looney say those things believing that it would probably cost him his membership of the association – which it did soon after he went public?   7. Why, if the vax is safe have US Army doctors filed affidavits in a lawsuit for a preliminary injunction in Federal District Court of Colorado, under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act, calling for an immediate halt to further COVID-19 “vaccinations” for all military personnel and the grounding of all personnel as a result of three pulmonary embolism events within 48 hours of their vaccination, one fatal?   8. Why is it that the governments of the UK, Europe, and the USA maintain that “the vaccines are safe” yet 5-million adverse events (where approximately 50% will result in life-time disablement) have been recorded in the voluntary reporting systems – which have been acknowledged in numerous studies to under-report adverse events by a factor of between 10 to 100? And why was the vaccination program not stopped in Australia given that the number of adverse events recorded in 2020 were 2 x number of adverse events recorded for the previous 20-years combined?   5. What are the Real Experts Saying?   1. Why did Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi who is a leading virus expert in microbiology in Germany, one of the most cited research scientists in German history, former professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, say:   “Gene-based vaccines are an absolute danger to mankind and their use at present violates the Nuremberg codex, such that everyone who is propagating their use should be put before tribunal.”   “Especially the vaccination of children is something that is so criminal that I have no words to express my horror … We are horribly worried that there’s going to be an impact on fertility. And this will be seen in years or decades from now. And this is potentially one of the greatest crimes, simply one of the greatest crimes imaginable.”?   2. Why does Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, FACC, FACP, FAHA, FASN, FNKF, FNLA, FCSRA, Prof. of Medicine with more than 1000 publications with more than 600 citations in the National Library of medicine, a world-renowned expert and leader in cardio and renal medicine, who has cured many hundreds of Covid patients with more than a 99 % success rate state:   “The current code vaccines; AstraZeneca, J&J, Pfizer & Moderna right now are obsolete. They do not cover the new variance. Patients are failing on these vaccines, they're being hospitalised and getting sick despite having the vaccines. The vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and percent injury, and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.”   “The failed mass Covid-19 vaccination programme will go down as one of the most deadly in history.”?   3. Why does Nobel Laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier, expert virologist, awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008 with a colleague for his discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) say:   “We’re in unknown territory and proclaim mandatory vaccines for everyone. It’s insanity. It’s vaccination insanity that I absolutely condemn.”?   And why is Dr. Montagnier claiming that widespread vaccination of children could have horrific generational consequences. And that the “Messenger RNA” may result in disastrous consequences without proper study; and why does he warn of the possibility of side effects of vaccines that could be seen in five to ten years related to neurodegenerative illness?   4. Why does Dr. Zev Zelenko, a Nobel prize nominee and Presidential medal of freedom nominee who has successfully treated hundreds of Covid patients with a 100% survival rate, where his patients rarely require hospitalisation say:   “Covid War Criminals Should Face Nuremberg-Style Trials For Crimes Against Humanity.”?   5. Why does Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, virologist and vaccine expert, who sits at the top of his field in what are probably the deepest and most insightful (non-Big Pharma funded) scientific articles that you will ever read on Covid make the following claims:   “The mass vaccination hype will undoubtedly enter history as the most reckless experiment in the history of medicine."   “Major outbreaks in countries with full vaccination rates … show that Herd Immunity is not improbable but impossible."   “Mass vaccination campaigns may have a beneficial short-time effect in that they reduce viral spread and protect vulnerable people from disease (e.g., elderly people and those with underlying disease), but will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants.”?   6. Why is the MSM not telling us that Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (who was a lead lawyer in suing Volkswagen over Diesel-gate for $ 4.3 billion – the largest automotive fine in history) has assembled an associated team of more than 10,000 doctors and more than 100 lawyers to bring a Nuremberg 2.0 type trial in relation to the vaccine-pushers; he states:   “The frauds committed by Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank pale in comparison to the damage wrought by those who sold the Covid-19 crisis as the worst viral outbreak to hit the world in more than a century and used it to cause media-driven panic, government overreach and human suffering on a scale still not fully quantified.”?   6. Vaxxed versus Unvaxxed   1. Why is it that, in the latest data from the UK, US and Australia, we are now seeing death rates for vaxxed people which are GREATER THAN that for unvaxxed people (whereas in the early days of vaccination it was the other way round), as has been predicted by several top non-government virologists and immunologists?   2. Why is the case that the latest data that has been exposed from the DOD-stamped document in the US, that would have been presented to the CDC and other agencies, shows that 71% of all new Covid infections are breakthrough infections, i.e. from people who have been vaxxed – meaning that it is a crisis of the vaxxed not the unvaxxed; and these numbers are rising?   3. Why is it that NO government sources are telling us what a growing number of experts have been saying all along – which is that vaxxed people can pass illness from the spike protein onto the unvaxxed, according to PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS?   4. Why is it that we have heard nothing in the MSM or from our politicians that an exceptionally extensive study involving both 2,947 US counties and 68 countries show that there is not only no difference in the Covid infection rates between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, but that the rate of Covid amongst the vaccinated INCREASES with the percentage of the population who are vaccinated?   5. Why, if the vaccinations are effective against Covid, are the percentages of people dying from Covid who have received vaccinations in NSW increasing to a rate where they are comparable to that of unvaccinated people?   7. Children   1. Why are countries rolling out the vaccine to children aged 12 – 16, when the reported deaths of children from the flu in the US is greater than that of Covid? (As of now, there are 332 deaths of children with COVID in the U.S. This compares to about 450/year in a normal flu season—and remember, these 332 deaths occurred during TWO COVID seasons. Beyond this, the CDC has noted that 35% of these deaths could not possibly have had anything to do with COVID [e.g., they were car accidents, suicides, etc.]. Thus, the actual number is not possibly above 219).   2. Why are we rolling out the vax to those under 18 years of age when up until 5th Sept 2021 there has been only one (1) death in the 10-19 age group in Australia (and the one Covid positive death was someone who had passed away from viral meningitis)?   3. Why are doctors not informing children and parents that the risk of children dying from the vaccine is 4 x that compared to Covid, according to a consortium of Irish doctors appearing in a video by the Irish Council of Human Rights?   4. Why are doctors not informing parents and children that the risk of vaccination in 12 – 15 year-old males increases their odds of developing a serious myocarditis condition post-jab (which is frequently permanent) by a factor of 19.   5. Why are governments constantly pressuring children and institutions, even when official advisory bodies to the government are recommending against it, to take the vaccine when there are numerous studies (almost all suppressed) showing that there is a NEGATIVE BENEFIT for children to take the vaccine, noting especially an exponential rise in debilitating myocarditis events experienced by young males in particular?   6. Why, if vaccines are safe for children, did Project Veritas recently release a bombshell undercover video where Brandon Schadt, Johnson & Johnson’s Regional Business Lead was caught admitting the following re giving the vax to children:   “It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know? Not something that’s so unknown in terms of repercussions down the road, you know?”   “Kids shouldn’t get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine.”   “It’s a kid, it’s a f*cking kid, you know? They shouldn’t have to get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine”   7. Why are NZDSOS (New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science) being ignored by the NZ government, when they have reported 5 deaths in vaxxed teenagers, and why are the NZ authorities not reporting these deaths? And why have gag orders been placed on people associated with all of these deaths, and why are the NZ government effectively covering up these facts?   8. Conflicts of interest?   To better understand how the MSM and special interest groups manipulate medical narratives I would highly recommend having a listen to the very insightful TEDx talk video by Sharyl Attkisson called, “Astroturf and manipulation of media messages.”   1.  Why might there be some concern regarding Prof. Peter Doherty (notwithstanding his positive contributions to the industry) and the Peter Doherty Institute due to the fact that he is in collaboration with Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group/Murdoch Children's Research Institute which has received very significant amounts of funding from vaccine manufacturers GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi and Sequiris?   2. Why would we trust Bill Gates, who is renowned for his absolutely appalling safety record regarding vaccine rollout – particularly in India – where the Indian government is suing him for the paralysis of 496,000 children as a result of Gates’s vaccines?   3. Why would we trust Bill Gates and his ties with the pharmaceutical industry when for Gates it has been, and always will be, about making unfathomable amounts of money, like the way in which he stated on air that he would make $ 200-billion from his $ 10-billion investment in vaccines?   4. Why would we place such emphasis on the advice from Bill Gates – who continues to fund billions into vaccine research, development and promotion – directly or indirectly funding the many institutions that make the policy decisions regarding vaccine rollouts?   5. Why might we believe that any research papers by ‘respected’ medical institutions or publishers that are partly or entirely funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates’ foundation, GAVI and so on would be likely to give positive reviews for products such as Hydroxychloroquine and the like, that compete with vaccines that Gates’ is developing?   6. Why do we permit such blatant and widespread conflicts of interest between the vaccine manufacturers, Bill Gates’s foundations, research institutions and many of our UK, Australian and US government leaders, which in a traditional corporate setting would be unthinkable, and which would lead to significant fines and prosecutions?   7. Why is it that Professor Neil Ferguson, epidemiologist with the Imperial College London, who collaborates with WHO and receives funding from the Gates Foundation, has such an influential position in advising the UK government on the effects of national or global disease outbreaks – when almost every single one of his predictions from Swine Flu to Ebola have been over-exaggerated by multiple orders of magnitude?   8. Why is it that many of the technocrats in many countries who are advising the governments and policy makers have direct or indirect financial interests in Big Pharma – where in the US for instance there is an interconnected web between Big Pharma funding, Bill Gates, the NIH, CDC, FDA etc?   9. And why do the authorities not seem to have an issue with the fact that Bill Gates – who is inextricably linked with Big Pharma, is THE BIGGEST donor to the WHO after the US government?   9. Big Pharma – Data, Testing and Trust   1.  Why should we trust vaccine manufacturers, who have one goal which is to make money ($ tens of billions every year from the booster shots alone) and who have for the past several decades had complete and absolute prosecutorial immunity against being sued?   2. Why would we trust Big Pharma, given the plethora of past and current lawsuits against them – including a record-breaking $ 2.3-billion fine for fraud against Pfizer in 2009 – the largest in Pharma history? … only to be outdone by GlaxoSmithKline three years later with a $ 3-billion fine for fraud allegations and failure to report safety data?   3. Why are vaccinated people not told that vaccine trials indicate that there is a chance that the vaccine can penetrate the endothelial layer and the blood brain barrier causing neurological damage, and why is there A LACK OF INFORMED CONSENT provided before being vaxxed?   4. Why is it that the four major vaccine companies have denied that graphene oxide is used in their vaccines, yet a very comprehensive study conducted in Sept 2021 unambiguously and categorically showed that all four of the major vaccines DO contain graphene oxide?   5. Why is it that there is no MSM publicity surrounding the findings from the mid-Sept 2021 Corona Committee Conference from 35 groups from across the US, the UK, Austria and Japan that looked at hundreds of samples from three of the vaccine manufacturers, finding sharp metal objects, graphene fragments, and non-biological (inorganic) material - that “have no business being in a vaccine” according to the researchers?   6. Why does there seem to be a media blackout on the fact that a group of lawyers, medical professionals and activists have asked members of the Polish parliament and Senate to organise an urgent investigation into the allegations of numerous whistle-blowers who have claimed that Pfizer was performing testing on 6-month-old orphan babies as part of their experiments?   7. Why is there not an outcry over the fact that 2,300 private emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci and various agencies and Big Tech reps (including Mark Zuckerberg) reveal that:   Hydroxychloroquine is effective against Covid Masks are useless against Covid Fauci was talking to Big Tech about censorship of cures for Covid Fauci makes a small fortune from the funding, vaccine research and patent ownership from the vaccines. Covid was man-made in a lab Fauci’s ‘gain of function’ research funded it, a practice that is illegal in the US because of the significant risks that it poses. Why are we not being told that taking Covid mRNA vaccines, according to an increasing number of studies (despite the wave of denial to the contrary by Big Pharma) is resulting in an accelerated rate of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), INCREASING the likelihood of developing illness from new Covid strains where those vaxxed are showing an increased risk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization?   8. Why were there ZERO studies conducted on the vaccines to show the effect that they would have regarding:-
  • Toxicity
  • Genotoxicity
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Auto immune diseases
  • Other drugs being taken?
  9. Why do documents from Moderna show that in just three months after roll-out, their internal reporting systems part way through the pandemic had recorded a staggering 300,000 adverse reactions to the jab, multiple times the figures contained within the VAERS database?   10. Why did the FDA not address the manipulations and violations from Pfizer regarding the protocol surrounding the testing of children after it submitted its review prior to approval, according to Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a risk-communication researcher and a teaching fellow in the University of Haifa, Israel?   (She reported that the conventional Phase 3 part of the trial that normally lasts between 1 to 4-years was completed in only 30-days; and at least four of the children in the study [a significantly high number at 0.4%] suffered from serious adverse events – that is, events in which at least one criterion was met: caused death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect?)   10. Ivermectin - the herd of elephants in the room   1. Why is there widespread negative publicity by the authorities stating that Ivermectin is ineffective, unsafe, unproven, without peer reviewed studies in the fight against Covid, when in fact:
  • There have been at least 42 peer reviewed studies on Ivermectin
  • It is as safe or safer than paracetamol
  • It has won a Nobel Prize
  • It has seen 3.7-billion doses administered worldwide
  • It has been used very extensively and successfully in the fight against Covid - in India, El Salvador, and around 30 other countries?
  • It has been shown to reduce mortality anywhere between 65 % to 85% in the majority of studies, depending principally on how soon it is administered to Covid patients?
  2. Why have we not been told that the countries in Africa that have been using Ivermectin have 7 x less morbidity and 8 x less mortality from Covid compared to nations that do not?   3. Why, if vaccines are effective, is it the case that the countries that are highly vaccinated like Israel (who experienced a surge in cases upon the rollout of the third [booster] shot) have multiple times the cases of Covid compared to Uttar Pradesh’s province of 241-million inhabitants that used Ivermectin along with some other inexpensive drugs in a widespread program that resulted in complete eradication of Covid in most of its regions?   4. Why have we constantly been told that Ivermectin is ineffective against Covid (where ‘evidence’ that cites poorly conducted, non-peer reviewed studies is used) when the amount of evidence – peer reviewed and otherwise to the contrary is simply overwhelmingly without equal?   (For evidence regarding why Ivermectin works there is a paper by a retired Australian doctor called Dr. Robyn Stephenson called “It is Dangerous to Suggest that Early Treatment for Covid-19 is Unsafe”published by The Canberra Declaration who spent 6-months performing research into Covid, citing 119 sources, on all things Covid. In my opinion this is literally in the top 0.1% of best research papers that I have come across on any topic).   5. Why, if Ivermectin is as effective in the fight against Covid as the abundant amount of (non-Big-Pharma linked) research suggests, have the TGA banned it? And why does the TGA both investigate, deregister and fine doctors with a risk of imprisonment if they prescribe Ivermectin to patients within Australia?   6. Why did the head of Merck, Sharpe & Dorne – the inventor of Ivermectin, advise against Ivermectin’s use in the treatment of Covid via this very inexpensive off-patent drug, (just before landing a $ 1.2-billion government contract for the supply of an expensive drug used to fight Covid)?   7. Why was it that as soon as Ivermectin was being touted as a cure for Covid, more than 200 scientific studies appeared [many with Big Pharma linked funding] warning us of its dangers and lambasting those who were being hospitalised for taking the horse-worming versions [despite having no evidence from either hospitals or people that this was happening])?   8. Why was it not publicised by the MSM that the Indian Bar Association is suing Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, chief scientist of the WHO, for supposedly deliberately ignoring and suppressing the FLCCC and the BIRD Panel’s data regarding the effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin?   9. Why is it, if Ivermectin is unsafe and ineffective against Covid, is it being given to select (vaxxed) Covid patients in some Australian hospitals?     10. Why is it that the Australian government has banned Ivermectin when the evidence relating to its safe and effective use against Covid is breathtaking, covering the following types of studies and trials – which almost all show moderate to significant efficacy in the fight against Covid
  1. Randomized Clinical Studies
  2. Observational Clinical Studies
  3. Epidemiologic Studies
  4. In-vitro studies
  5. In vivo studies
  6. In-silico studies
  7. Clinical, Pharmacologic observations / experience
  8. Observational control trials
  9. Meta analysis of randomised control trials
  10. Observational and randomised trials?
  11. Why do the Western nations of the world in particular take no notice of the fact that Uttar Pradesh in India has practically eradicated Covid whilst by comparison the Indian state of Kadesh who are not using Ivermectin has a Covid case rate of more than 1000 x that of Uttar Pradesh?   11. Government Policy and politics   1.  Why is it that members of a growing number of countries, including Poland (a previously Communist country) are protesting against the claimed overreaches of the Police in Victoria against protestors (notwithstanding the fact that some protesters were doing the wrong thing), outside the Australian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, prompting the following statements:   “The whole world sees what is happening in Australia. Australia has contracted Covid madness. “This is how totalitarianism is born, these are not conspiracy theories.”?   2. Why does there seem to be almost no concern nor criticism by the MSM and politicians in Australia regarding the draconian treatment of protesters in Victoria in particular who were shot in the back with rubber bullets while running away from Police, whilst others have been slammed head-first into the ground, encouraged by commanders who look forward to “cracking some skulls?”   3. Why is it that the governments of many countries, Australia in particular, are mandating severe, draconian lockdowns – that have been condemned for quite some time now by the WHO for leading to significant deprivations to both people’s and nation’s health and wellbeing?   4. Why is Australia focused on going down the lockdown route whenever there are numerous studies showing that lockdowns don’t work, including significant examples like Sweden which was infamous within Europe for having almost no lockdown, instead keeping schools, businesses and their economy open?   5. Why do the politicians in Australia and in NZ (who locked down the whole of the South Island despite having ZERO Covid cases, decimating the tourism industry in the process) choose to lock down their regions, despite the evidence from states like North Dakota and South Dakota that experienced near identical Covid statistics despite one state opening up and one state remaining locked down?   6. Why is it that governments mandate lockdowns to specific employment sectors (forcing many vaccine-hesitant people to lose their jobs and livelihoods in the process) whilst refusing to mandate vaccinations for themselves at both state and federal levels?   7. Why is it that many hundreds of thousands of frontline nurses and doctors around the world who worked extra shifts, around the clock with claustrophobic, ill-fitting, physically bruising PPE during the worst of the pandemic are being rewarded by their governments with the loss of their job for not taking the jab, in turn straining health systems?   8. Why are governments mandating vaccines for those who have recovered from Covid when the real-life data is increasingly showing us that taking the vaccine for this naturally immune group of people actually INCREASES the chance of catching Covid?   9. Why are we quarantining the healthy in the midst of this ‘pandemic’, causing immunological experts to be horrified, when this has NEVER been done during viral outbreaks or pandemics where historically only the sick have ever been quarantined?   10. Why are many states and countries mandating jabs for people who have already recovered from Covid, when the data shows us that covid-recovered persons are 13 x less likely than vaxxed persons to develop Covid, and are at almost zero risk of serious injury or death post-Covid recovery?   And why are we mandating the vaccination of Covid-recovered persons when Pfizer scientists were filmed undercover admitting that natural antibodies are better than the vaccinations in the protection against Covid?   11. Why has the government of Australia continued with their current severe lockdown policies, at a cost of approximately $200-million for each death to date, plus immeasurable additional costs regarding social, mental, physical, community and economic aspects that will be experienced for many years to come?   12. Why does the Australian government seem to be indifferent to the fact that an increasing number of US politicians are calling out Australia on its blatant human rights violations, in Victoria at least - being administered under the guide of paradoxically ‘keeping people safe’ during the longest locked down city in the world?   And why are some US representatives almost unthinkably calling for Australian boycotts as a result of the human rights violations experienced within Australia which have ignominiously resulted in them labelling Australia “Apartheid Australia: Hell on earth.”?   13. Why has AHPRA silenced health practitioners from raising concerns about what they call the experimental gene therapy (called Covid-19 vaccine); and why has AHPRA dismissed some seasoned health practitioners and threatened others with fines for raising genuine concerns that have been counter to AHPRA’s prescribed narrative?   14. Why is it, given that Covid ranks well outside the top-20 causes of death and that the $ 300-billion (and growing) cost, merits state governments implementing the harshest lockdowns in the world and shutting down significant aspects of the economy?   15. Why is it that Australians who have emigrated from Communist / Marxist countries seem to be the first to claim that Australia has become fascist in our governmental approach, making many comparisons to Germany in 1937?   16. Why would we trust Dr. Fauci with one of the most influential positions within America at this time, as he assists in formulating pandemic response policy, given that he is infamously on the record for constantly contradicting his own advice on numerous occasions?   17. Why has there not been calls for a major investigation into the claim by the SALK Institute in San Diego – the premier global research institute on vaccines, that the spike proteins in the mRNA vaccines were found to be pathogenic during testing? The institute claimed that THE VACCINES ARE CAUSING THE DISEASE, and that they damage cells and cause vascular disease even without a virus, a claim that is being espoused by a growing number of immunologists and epidemiologists?   18. Why is it that there has been an almost complete media blackout regarding multiple, recent courts cases against the government-mandated lockdowns, unfair dismissals regarding the jab, and alleged multiple breaches of human rights abuses – such as the claim by G&B Lawyers that a total of 13 individual rights and freedoms are being infringed by NSW public health orders?   19. Why are few people aware that Jack Ma (China’s richest man) and TikTok (the Beijing-owned social media site) each donated over $ 3 million AUD to Melbourne’s Doherty Institute vaccine research – the body that the government relies upon for clinical, research and public health advice within Australia regarding the COVID-19 response?   20. Why does the government data relating to the number of injuries and deaths keep moving up and down on the Australian TGA website, along with categories being changed; and why on the US VAERS website did independent analysts report the deletion of some 150,000 adverse reaction records thereby reducing the number of vaxxed injuries along with countless other examples of specific VAERS case numbers being altered?   21. Why is it the case that in the recent 8-hour review panel before the FDA a group of scientific researchers claimed that, based upon the VAERS data, for every life that the vaccine saved from Covid it killed two people, or up to five people killed for every life saved based upon other data; and why did the CDC go ahead and approve the vaccine after this anyway?   22. Why is it not well known that in cities such as Melbourne The Rockefeller Foundation (linked directly to Big Pharma) and the United Nations have multiple networks in place that deal directly with city Mayors and leaders of LG municipalities, that bypass red tape and constitutional governance at state or national levels, enabling the deployment of overseas troops in emergency situations – as is allegedly the case in Australia during the Covid crisis?   12. Other   1. Why did the CDC change its definition of Covid reporting guidelines just prior to the pandemic, resulting in 16.7 x higher number of deaths than there would have been under the previous reporting guidelines?   2. Why is Remdesivir being prescribed by AHPRA in Australia and by the FDA in the US as part of the recommended treatment protocol whenever a previous trial with Remdesivir saw it kill so many people that it was withdrawn from the trial?   3. And again, why is it being prescribed when in June 2020 a trial was published involving 61 patients with Covid-19 who were given a 10-day course of Remdesivir that ultimately resulted in 23% of them suffering serious adverse events - most commonly serious multiple-organ-dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and hypotension?   4. Why, if the vax is so safe, are a significant number of people, most of whom are well informed from a wide variety of sources, not taking it (including the largest group of vaccine-informed groups being those with PhDs), instead choosing to imperil their livelihood, careers, and even reputations?   5. Why are we not informed that there is a reduction in the capability of the immune system against other types of diseases with each successive jab that is taken, making the body more susceptible to picking up other infections?   6. Why has virtually no mention been made of the fact that within the European database of 420-million people there is an unparalleled level of detail showing that the total deaths during the Covid wave in 2020 coincided almost identically with the flu season of 2017/2018 and that the total deaths during the Covid 2020 wave were practically identical to long term total deaths trendlines in Europe for prior years?   7. Why, if vaccines are safe, did Project Veritas release in their undercover expose of a Johnson & Johnson scientist called Justin Durrant who said, “Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though.”   8. Why do we not believe that there could be a possibility that the $36,000 offered to US hospitals for Covid deaths could be an incentive for them to record deaths as Covid when they might not be, resulting in an inflation of the actual numbers?   9. Why is it that if the vaccines are safe, that in just my personal orbit of acquaintances and their acquaintances in Australia we can together list 10-people who we know personally between us who have died within a month, most within days, of taking either the first or second vax – as follows:
  • A good friend of mine and her friend know of three deaths – all dead within several days of taking the vax, no co-morbidities: i) A healthy mother in her 50’s, ii) a 51 year-old mother, healthy – literally dropped dead in a work meeting in front of her distressed colleagues, iii) a fit 71 year old man who started bleeding from multiple places over his body. Dead several days later.
  • Another close friend of mine was furnished with information regarding four deaths from a close friend and trusted source in a NSW country town, all within days of taking the vax.
  • An ambulance officer on the front line (now out of work for not taking the vax) knows of three deaths - one of whom was a very fit 44 year-old medical professional (whose name I know but will not disclose for purposes of anonymity), dead within days of taking the jab?
(Based upon my discussions with these sources it is most unlikely that most, if any, of these deaths will be recorded on the official TGA website as vaccine related deaths? We suspect this since this is what many dozens of whistle-blowers in the US and Australia are telling us).   10. Why is it that if the vaccines are safe that a study claims that 12% of people in the US know of someone who has died after taking the vaccine?   11. Why are there countless deaths recorded as Covid deaths whenever they have nothing at all to do with Covid, aside from the fact that they died WITH Covid; for example, media headlines such as these have been reported “Man who died after falling from a 10-foot ladder was actually killed by Covid:doctors”, or “Man dies from Covid after being shot dead.”?   12. Why is there not greater consideration being given to the wellbeing of teenagers who are self-harming at record rates, with at least 40 teenagers rushed to hospital in New South Wales for self-harm every day, exacerbated by the lockdown restrictions, with various states in Australia beating previous helpline call records?   13. Why does the ex-Premier of NSW, Gladys Berejiklian, and other politicians consistently mention phrases like “I certainly wouldn’t want to be in the same room as an unvaccinated person,” if the vaccines are meant to provide protection against Covid?   14. Why is it that the Red Cross in the US has recently announced that it is not accepting plasma donated from vaccinated people (although it is still accepting blood)?   15. Why is it that, according to PANDA (Pandemic Data and Analytics) when we stop to reflect on things at this point in time regarding all things Covid that it would appear that ALMOST ALL of the policies in many countries regarding their pandemic response are the exact OPPOSITE of what might be considered rational in the bid to save lives?   13. Wrap up   I fully appreciate that much of the information in this document will probably be new, given that it will COMPLETELY CONTRADICT the mainstream media, government policies and so-called expert advisory bodies.   All that I would ask you to do is to perhaps stand back and do your best to look at the data/evidence by somehow finding independent sources and make your mind up from there. I will end by asking three questions:
  1. Should we trust governments to 'just do their job' in terms of making and enforcing their Covid-related orders without question because they know best?
  2. Or is there something more that we should be doing to shout this message from the rooftops, if indeed we believe that we have a crisis on our hands?
  3. And if so, what might each of us personally do?
I’d like to give the penultimate opportunity to ‘speak’ to Prof. Vernon Coleman, an international bestselling author and retired medical doctor. He is an acknowledged expert on drug and vaccine adverse events. He is not one to exaggerate; his predictions regarding the evolution of the Covid crisis have so far come to pass with chilling accuracy. In a prior video he literally broke down in uncontrollable sobs at one point when he reflected upon the path that humanity was embarking on in terms of the global vaccine rollout at a breakneck pace:   Given that today is a significant milestone birthday for me (the Big ½-Century) I’d like to perhaps indulge in a little humour given the darkness of this topic by giving the last word to Little Suzie, a made-up character of sorts, who with a broad smile on her face holds a TV screen in one hand that she has smashed with a hammer in her other hand, with the following caption: “And just like that … little Suzie cured the worst virus of all.”   14. Critical Information Sources – please watch if you can   There are many hundreds of high-quality information pieces that I could list here – none of which you will find in the MSM or amongst government sources.   But if you’ve managed to make it this far – well done and thank you. I appreciate that this will not have been a light and easy read.   However, if you could spare the time I would very highly recommend listening to these videos or transcripts – perhaps even just the shorter ones, which will help to fill in many of the gaps that I have not been able to complete in the space available here.   Note that search engines like Google will typically sensor anything that questions the use of vaccines and YouTube have publicly admitted that they will remove any content that speaks out against vaccination, so you might for example have to do some digging in the ether for the required information by using a web browser such as DuckDuckGo. And of course if you search for these articles, below, you will quite likely be met with the all-knowing Fact-checkers (many of which have direct or indirect ties into Big-Pharma) that will claim to debunk some of these videos).   1. Project Veritas Undercover cameras with Pfizer corporation. 10-minute YouTube video plus various alternative news articles where Pfizer Scientists claim that natural [COVID] Antibodies Are Better Than The [Pfizer] Vaccination.   2. How Rockefeller Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures. 3-minutes, very insightful   3. Microscopic examination of vaccines by Dr. Carrie Madej on Stew Peters show on Rumble. 16-minutes; both surreal and disturbing.   (I will admit that I have not had an opportunity to examine this in detail; however, others have seen similar things under the microscope, so I think this is probably genuine, although I hope that it is not).   4. 2030 unmasked documentary: 2-hours long, EXCEPTIONALLY INSIGHTFUL, pulling back the curtains into the worlds that are purposely kept from us.   To save a little time you could perhaps skip the first 20-minutes and the last 5-minutes. Can be played at double speed.   5. Revealing Covid. 1-hour presentation by a retired doctor. Exceptionally insightful, useful and informative. Link: Revealing Covid - Condensed Edition (   Author: Dr Phil Greer 5th October 2021 Conflicts of interest by author: none Payment received: none Copyright ©: none, feel free to distribute widely  
Categories: Blogs, United States

Let's Go Brandon, Featuring Tyson James & Chandler Crump

Sat, 2021-10-30 10:32 +0000

Surprise! ...NOT.   YouTube has censored "Let's Go Brandon."

Consequently, I've updated this post to embed the video from Rumble, which is the much more reliable and honest source.

'Let's Go Brandon' lyrics by Bryson Gray:

[Intro: Joe Biden & Bryson Gray]
The various shots the people are getting now cover that
They're-, they're-, they're okay
You're not gonna-, you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations
Somebody gotta do it

[Chorus: Bryson Gray]
Let's go, Brandon
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy (Brrt, brrt)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Let's go, Brandon
When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)
Let's go, Brandon
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy (Pow, pow)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, thеy just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Lеt's go, Brandon
When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Let's go)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go)

[Verse 1: Bryson Gray]
Biden said the jab stop the spread, it was lies (I remember)
How you woke, but you haven't opened your eyes? (You ain't see)
These politicians are demons, just in disguise (Facts)
Look at Kyrie Irving and Nicki Minaj (Let's go)
Look at Australia, that's what's comin' next if we don't stand up
Stop complyin' with them takin' our rights, it's time to man up
'Publicans votin' for red flag laws, that's just what I can't trust
If you ask questions 'bout the vax, then they gonna ban us (It's true)
Ayy, this is 'bout control, everybody knows
Everyone complies weigh the cons and pros
I don't need a plane, I just hit the road
I do what I want, I can't sell my soul
Market 'bout to crash, this is what you chose
Ruinin' the country, I think that's the goal
You gon' take the mark, I take narrow roads
I'm a man of God, I can never fold
[Chorus: Bryson Gray]
Let's go, Brandon
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy, ayy, ayy (Brrt, brrt)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Let's go, Brandon
When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)
Let's go, Brandon
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy (Pow, pow)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Let's go, Brandon


When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Let's go)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go)

[Verse 2: Tyson James]
Let's go, Brandon and it's clear that man a wreck, ayy, ayy
Let's go, Brandon, now the Taliban a threat, ayy
You planned it, now the Taliban is standin' on our neck
Chantin' "Death to America", you are barely president
Listen, I don't think you hear, man, let me make it clear, man
Better keep yo' hands unto yourself, that stuff is weird, man
I wish I could take you in the back play, smear the queer, man
You could take the vax, I fear God, I don't fear man
I'm on gear ten, believe me, we ready to rumble
The only play that Joe can execute is a fumble (Facts)
I think we all know he's out to lunch, that dude went campin'
I'm a Christian, so how do I say this? Let's go, Brandon
[Chorus: Bryson Gray]
Let's go, Brandon
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy (Brrt, brrt)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Let's go, Brandon
When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go, Brandon)

[Verse 3: Chandler Crump]
(Gottem, Ayy, yuh)
Let's go, Brandon, we know he cappin'
Patriots out in the street takin' action
Huntin' us down for speakin' the truth (Huh)
Beat down the pedo, let's save all the youth (Uh huh)
Media lyin', ignore all the cryin'
They buildin' back better, but only the Taliban (What?)
Pilots on strike, but to Joe, it's irrelevant
Open the border, lose all the order
Divide us up so they know that we never win
But we united, we here in the stadiums (Let's go)
Everyone chantin' it, CNN slanderin' (Let's go)
Biden collapsin' and Democrats stealin' it (Facts)
Ayy, we look at Joe, can we get a refund? (Brandon)
How 'bout some mean tweets? (Facts)
Joe is a crook, and he knows how to deceive
F. J. B. is the motto in these streets, let's go, Brandon
Sing it with me
[Chorus: Bryson Gray]
I keep a drum like I'm Nick Cannon, ayy, ayy (Pow, pow)
Let's go, Brandon
Pandemic ain't real, they just planned it, ayy, ayy (They just planned it)
Let's go, Brandon
When you ask questions, they start bannin', ayy, ayy (Facts)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Let's go)
Let's go, Brandon, ayy, ayy (Ayy, let's go)

More at

Categories: Blogs, United States

They Only Confess When There Is No Other Choice

Sat, 2021-10-30 09:46 +0000

Michael Barone:  Health and Education Elites Forced To Confess Error

The second apology came on Oct. 22 from the National School Boards Association for its Sept. 29 letter to President Joe Biden charging that parents protesting school board decisions should be investigated as possible "domestic terrorists."

It turns out that the NSBA had discussed the earlier letter with White House staffers before sending it. Three business days after its release, Attorney General Merrick Garland called on the FBI and U.S. attorneys to investigate violence at school board meetings.

The September letter was inspired by protests at school board meetings in Loudoun County, Virginia, some 40 miles west of Washington. One parent who charged that his daughter was assaulted was violently hauled out of the meeting, at which Superintendent Scott Ziegler assured the audience, "To my knowledge, we don't have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms." He added, "the predator transgender student or person simply does not exist."

Ziegler lied. As radio station WTOP reported, Ziegler had emailed school board members on May 28 that a female student, the protesting parent's daughter, had been sexually assaulted in a girl's bathroom by a male student wearing a dress.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States


Sat, 2021-10-30 09:02 +0000
Categories: Blogs, United States

Dr. Lenny Da Costa of Goa, India explains

Fri, 2021-10-29 22:08 +0000

India has been using Ivermectin both as prevention and treatment.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Sharyl Attkisson: The Definitive Summary

Fri, 2021-10-29 18:21 +0000

Covid-19 natural immunity compared to vaccine-induced immunity

Updated Oct. 29 with Israel data showing vaccine immunity wore off in just a few months in all age groups

Updated Oct. 13 with UK info showing waning vaccine effectiveness after 3-4 months.

Updated Oct. 3 with Finnish study showing antibodies after Covid-19 infection persist for a long time

Updated Sept. 12 with CDC-funded study finding U.S. population reached what some experts said is "herd immunity" levels last May. Also, updated CDC number of fully-vaccinated hospitalizations and deaths with Covid.

Updated Sept. 8 with new study in Science Transitional Medicine and recommended spacing of Covid-19 RNA shots due to declining effectiveness and lack of effectiveness of vaccine mandates

Updated Aug. 27 with large Israel study that finds dramatically better protection from natural immunity than vaccination

Updated Aug. 24 with Israel changing policies with recognition that the Pfizer vaccine allegedly wears off after several months.

Updated Aug. 6 with CDC analysis of Kentucky (unvaccinated Kentuckians had "2.34 times the odds of reinfection" compared with fully vaccinated) and national analysis in Israel (vaccinated Israelis were 6.72 times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection). More below.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Only If the Plan is to Keep the Pandemic Going

Fri, 2021-10-29 16:58 +0000

And by the way, FDA vaccine advisers voted their approval of administering COVID-19 vaccine to 5 to 11-year olds, the group least likely to need it.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Biden's Energy Policy: Insane or Evil?

Fri, 2021-10-29 15:28 +0000

Categories: Blogs, United States

Tell Me Again What the Vaccines Are Supposed to Do?

Fri, 2021-10-29 14:19 +0000

Once upon a time, vaccines were going to crush COVID-19.  Now, a UK study finds that you can catch COVID-19 from someone who has been vaccinated.

A year-long study from the Imperial College London published in The Lancet on Thursday found that the Delta variant is still highly transmissible within a vaccinated population.

“By carrying out repeated and frequent sampling from contacts of COVID-19 cases, we found that vaccinated people can contract and pass on infection within households, including to vaccinated household members,” Dr. Anika Singanayagam, co-lead author of the study, said in a statement.

The findings, Singanayagam added, provide some insight into why the Delta variant is “continuing to cause high COVID-19 case numbers … even in countries with high vaccination rates.”

An analysis found that the viral load declined most rapidly for those who were vaccinated with the Delta variant compared with those who are unvaccinated, according to the researchers.

But the peak levels of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, which causes COVID-19, in vaccinated people were similar to levels in unvaccinated people, they found, adding that it might be the reason why the Delta variant can spread despite vaccination.

Because the Delta variant can spread easily among vaccinated people, another researcher involved in the study, Dr. Ajit Lalvani, argued it is necessary for people to get the vaccine or boosters to reduce severe COVID-19 symptoms.

Reduce severe symptoms?  Whatever happened to immunity?

Immunity from full vaccination also dropped in as little as three months, their research also found. They didn’t say whether it should inform the UK’s booster policy. (My emphasis.)

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Biden Jets off to Europe Without Closing the Deal

Fri, 2021-10-29 13:12 +0000

Democrats refuse Biden’s $1.75 trillion framework.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi underscored the high stakes for Mr. Biden as he headed to separate meetings with Pope Francis, the Group of 20 major economic powers and a world climate change summit in Glasgow.

“What this legislation will do is to help the president meet his goals, the goals of America,” said Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat. “When he goes to meetings with the G-20 now and then to meet His Holiness, the pope, and to go to Glasgow, we want him to go as strong as possible.”

Within hours, it was obvious the rifts remained among congressional Democrats and a deal would not quickly solidify. Hopes that the framework would clear the way for a vote on a separate $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure deal also were dashed.

Further complicating a broad acceptance of Mr. Biden’s framework was moderate Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin III of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, key swing votes in the chamber, refusing to say whether they are on board with the deal.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Righteousness + Force in America: The Trap of Righteous Activism Coupled with State Power

Wed, 2021-10-27 13:50 +0000

The following article was provided by Sam Jacobs, Lead Writer and Chief Historian for


There are two ways of getting things done: persuasion or coercion. You either convince someone of the value of your ideas or you hold a (literal or metaphorical) gun to their head. The latter has been the norm throughout human history. Most of what we value about the contemporary West is a shift toward the former occurring over the last 250 years or so.

However, there’s an important difference between the despotisms of old and coercive governments in the modern era: modern-day tyrants frame themselves as the righteous side in any conflict.

Think about it: Ancient Persian Emperors and the German Kaiser didn’t paint themselves as the moral superiors of their enemies. They simply wanted their stuff and, if they could, they took it. In contrast, during the American Civil War or the Allied cause during World War II, force didn’t justify itself. Instead, force was justified by the righteousness of the cause.

(President Lincoln openly, repeatedly stated more than a year into the Civil War that his call to "end slavery" was a useful means by which to justify his real objective: To preserve the Union.)

The need to justify force with righteousness is not limited to wartime. Every new coercive law or regulation is justified not on the basis of “I’m strong enough to take your stuff and so I think I will,” but because “our cause is just.” While some who would take your freedom or your life are motivated by their desire for power, the most vicious monsters in human history were all motivated by righteousness. They seek to perfect creation, no matter what the cost, rather than simply acquire power for its own end - a philosophically important distinction.

It is this philosophy of using state power to impose one's morality on others that in part has made American politics such a bloodsport nowadays. If you follow the thread from the Abolitionist movement (which provided moral justification for the Union's invasion of the Confederacy) through the Temperance movement (which culminated in Prohibition) to the Progressivism movement as we detail below, you'll see why.

What Do We Mean by Righteousness?

Righteousness is simply the sense that one's cause is so just that "the ends justify the means" – the ends could be anything. A critical feature of righteousness is the belief in the perfectibility of man and earth. It is often accompanied by philosophical progressivism, the view that the world becomes a better place, morally speaking, over time.

Righteousness requires coercion. This necessitates a large administrative state to enforce the prevailing diktats of the secular-religious. An excellent example from recent history is the campaign against tobacco, which in the span of a few years was chased from every public place.

Righteousness is not simply progressivism. It is a specific type of progressivism forged in America through the experience of Pietist Protestant Christians. The Pietists were originally Scandinavian Lutherans, but the posture of Pietism spread to most Protestant denominations in the United States: The Northern Baptists and Methodists, the Congregationalists, the Disciples of Christ, the Presbyterians, and others.

The Pietists rejected ritualistic or "liturgical" religious practice in favor of an inner experience expressed in one's daily life. Correct beliefs and proper living were the focus, culminating in the Holiness Movement, which was an extreme and fundamentalist expression of Pietism. Holiness tolerated no deviation from orthodoxy in either thought or deed.

Righteousness, like its Pietist forebears, isn't satisfied that you do and say the right things, you need to truly believe the right things. Compliance is not enough. You have to love Big Brother.

Righteousness moved from the realm of the deeply religious Protestant pietists of early America into the mainstream progressive movement. The latter adopted this surety and energy, seeking to expand their ersatz religion into every aspect of American life.

Righteousness is dangerous as a political force because of how certain it makes those infected with it. What's more, political righteousness makes the stakes increasingly apocalyptic, allowing the ends to continually justify any means, up to and including the death camp.

This is not hyperbole: Righteousness does not prohibit your political participation, it demands it, and it sees everything else about you as superfluous.

Righteousness Enters the World Stage: Abolitionism

It is often said that before the Civil War, the United States "are," but after the War, the United States "is." This is a reference to the formerly theoretically sovereign nature of each state as compared to "one nation, indivisible" found in the Pledge of Allegiance, which was created after the Civil War by a Union war veteran.

Why does this distinction matter? Because it was a distinction which the Confederacy, headed by Jefferson Davis, was willing to test in the furnaces of war.

In the run-up to the War, Davis repeatedly pointed out that the U.S. was a voluntary union of states which delegated authority to Washington, as ratified in the U.S. Constitution in the Bill of Rights #9 and #10. Thus if a state wanted to leave the Union, it could do so. Despite the best efforts of the southern states to maintain the Union, at the end of the day they voted to secede because their differences with the northern states were irreconcilable. Was slavery one of the issues over which they didn't agree? Yes, absolutely. Slavery was an issue that plagued the Founders as well.

Yet Davis made an important point: Just because one doesn't like slavery (and we don't like slavery, let's be clear) that does not then automatically mean that one supports President Lincoln using the U.S. Army to roll into the Confederacy in order to occupy them and make them behave the way we'd like them to. This is persuasion vs. coercion in action.

(One of the reasons Jefferson Davis was never tried for treason following the Civil War is that his case would've given him a platform to highlight the Constitutional issues presented by the North's invasion of the South.)

Fast forward to the present day. If you're reading this then you're likely a Unionist (i.e. happy that the U.S. is intact), at least in spirit if not in name, and also a fan of President Lincoln. Yet it was President Lincoln who said, in a widely publicized 1862 letter written more than a year into the War:

"My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do lesswhenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause (of saving the Union), and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause."

One can point this out without arguing in favor of slavery as it's clear President Lincoln knew what he was doing - trying to save the Union - and that picking up the moral banner of ending slavery was a useful means by which to ally himself because it furthered his goal of saving the Union. Machiavelli would've been proud, and so were the Abolitionists, who got a taste of what righteousness and force can do once the reins of state power are grasped.

It was these Abolitionists who not only claimed the moral high ground for President Lincoln during the War but who, following Appomattox, then went about the Reconstruction of the Southern state governments, which was largely a disaster. During Reconstruction, the Northern Republicans attempted to form Southern state governments with people who either had no experience in governance or had no connections to their constituents because the righteousness of their cause, "reconstructing" the South, would make it all work in the end.

Note that this is not a condemnation of the abolitionist cause, instead, it is a condemnation of the social phenomenon of righteousness, which generally sees political orthodoxy as trumping basic competence.

The end of the Civil War led to a total war against American citizens. Significant portions of Southern states were stripped of the right to vote and the right to keep and bear arms. The Radical Reconstructionist Congress was all too eager to ride roughshod over the Southern states because they felt ideologically and morally justified in doing so.

What caused the Civil War will always remain a question of debate. What will not is that it represented a massive transfer of power upward from sovereign individuals and states to a centralized federal government, as Jefferson Davis warned. This provided later incarnations of righteousness and force with a ready-made set of tools to increase the efficiency of coercion.

The Reconstruction period did little to heal the nation. It gave us the Klan and Jim Crow laws, but it stands as an example of righteousness having a large effect on American politics.

Righteousness must also be considered separately from the question of abolition itself, which was a moot point by the time the Reconstruction governments came into power. It's one thing to see slavery, which was the default mode of human production throughout all of human history, as a great moral evil that must be ended at once. It is another to dramatically punish, humiliate, and disenfranchise people who participated in this economic system.

It is still another thing entirely to attempt to dramatically remake the world into one's personal vision of Heaven on Earth. The carpetbaggers flooding Southern states during the Reconstruction Era believed that they simply needed to point the right guns in the right direction to create their earthly paradise.

Righteousness, in addition to a tangible ability of coercion through the military, cops, and courts, was the animating force of Reconstruction; however, it didn't end there.

Righteousness Comes for Your Daily Life: Temperance

The Prohibition Era and the Temperance Movement that preceded it are oft-overlooked areas of American history; however, this is our next stop on the tour of armed, militant righteousness.

Temperance was not originally in favor of Prohibition. The Temperance Movement, as the name suggests, was originally about moderate drinking. This was a time when the average American rarely consumed water and instead hydrated with beer and spirits. Only later did Temperance become synonymous with teetotaling and banning alcohol.

The pro-Prohibition or "dry" argument is rarely given enough attention, with many dismissing the period as a brief blip of madness requiring no further explanation. However, it's worth diving into what the drys believed.

The drys believed that alcohol was not simply an individual choice, but a highly corrosive social factor. They blamed the decay of the family and a host of other social ills on demon alcohol.

Post-World War I urbanization added gas to the fire. People were concerned about their children moving to cities and becoming introduced to saloon life. It followed, for the drys, that banning alcohol would end these social ills. In many cases, they believed the final result would be the Second Coming.

The degree to which Prohibition "worked" or could have is debatable, but we definitively know that Prohibition drove the rise in organized crime and militarized policing in a symbiotic relationship.

Strange as it might sound, the "drys" tended to be part of the Progressive Movement of the early 20th Century. They too sought to cure social ills like child labor, dirty meat, women's disenfranchisement, and the like using coercion rather than persuasion. Despite the rather strange bedfellows, conservative Christian anti-liquor people allied with labor activists and proto-feminists. We can now begin to see how righteousness begins to move into the modern left.

Prohibition was also a dramatic intensification of force.

Abolition wanted to remove a barbaric economic system from America. Temperance, however, attempted to police the daily behaviors of average Americans. It is frequently noted how few who fought for the Southern cause were impacted by abolition. The abolitionists sought systemic change. No one was ever thrown in jail for being a plantation owner.

Temperance, on the other hand, made tens of millions of Americans into felons overnight.

The scale of Temperance is important to note as it is a far more aggressive posture than the War on Drugs because it went after a substance that had been widely used for centuries. Banning cocaine in 1920, the year the Volstead Act took effect, would have impacted orders of magnitude fewer people.

Abolitionists saw a system as the center of great moral outrage. Abolitionism saw individuals as the engine. And so that's who it targeted: Not a regional economic system, but individuals consuming the world's most widely used substance in any amount.

Righteousness Comes For Everything: The Progressive Era

The Progressive Era of the early 20th Century offers insight because it is the first serious attempt to use righteousness combined with coercion to take over every aspect of American society. Unfortunately, it would not be the last.

The Progressive Era saw righteousness rule America as a broad coalition of suffragettes, Prohibitionists, labor reformers, child advocates, and other interest groups. This was the era that gave us federal control over medicine, the income tax, compulsory education of children, and a host of other measures that curbed individual liberty.

People were not asked to live righteous lives. They were forced to using state power.

The Era was wrapped up in religious zeal, taking place at the same time as the Third Great Awakening, an uptick in Holiness, Nazarene, and Pentecostal religious denominations, which were Pietist Protestant movements emerging in the second half of the 19th Century. Much like later movements, these religious groups sought to make heaven on earth by reforming human behavior.

The social sciences also began in earnest around this time. They offered secular solutions that mirrored their religious alternatives. Man was broken, not by sin, but by socialization. Salvation was not to be found in the Gospels but in the social sciences.

This secular view of man fits well with the religious views of Social Gospel. Social Gospel believed that the Gospel held answers not just for spiritual life, but for social problems as well: alcoholism, urban crime, racial tensions, environmental concerns, and other issues – common goals made for a common cause.

The Progressive Era was largely successful in that it transformed a passive and largely benign federal government into an all-pervasive bureaucracy. It formed the basis of the administrative state which was greatly expanded, first under FDR, then under LBJ.

It was the first time in American history that using righteousness and force seeking to coerce all non-believers into compliance became a mass, mainstream political trend in American politics. The parallels to the modern left are easy to draw in this context.

Righteousness Conquers the World: Wilson and Progressivism

Woodrow Wilson was, by all accounts, the progressive President. What he did at home pales in comparison to what he did abroad. Much of the map of the modern world owes a lot to President Woodrow Wilson.

Wilson was the originator of the Wilsonian foreign policy, which broadly speaking means that aggressive ideological aims are pursued abroad. For Wilson, this meant forming the League of Nations, national sovereignty over ancient empires, and the Western-liberal version of democracy.

Nations had long fought for their own freedom. They had sometimes fought for the freedom of their allies, but it was thinly veiled realpolitik. Wilson, however, demanded a specific vision of freedom for the world.

It was not the riches of the colonial world or geopolitical considerations fueling Wilson's drive to get into World War I, something that he ran against. Wilson wanted to end the possibility of any future war by remaking the world in such a way that war would be impossible.

Righteousness and coercion were no longer the exclusive provinces of one set of religious do-gooders. It was the official policy of the American Departments of State and War.

Why Righteousness Trends Toward Totalitarianism

Righteousness is always impossible to enforce without tyrannical measures trending toward totalitarianism. This is because righteousness attempts to tackle problems so large that massive state intervention is required. The bigger the problem, the more state intervention, coercion, is required.

This is why the current iteration of righteousness and force is so insidious. It attempts to untangle the Gordian knot of human inequality. Not equality before the law or equality of opportunity. But human inequality as such.

The current crusade of righteousness is using the levers of state power, which are now capable of reaching every corner of the globe and monitoring virtually all private communication, to chase after a totally flat, "equal" society without any divergence of the outcome.

This type of equality means kneecapping some people and is arguably the final result of the stages of righteousness and force outlined above. Righteousness and force in America first attempted to tackle an economic problem, Abolitionism; then a moral problem, Temperance; followed by a political problem, Progressivism.

It now attempts to solve the problem of why some people have more than others, more health, wealth, fame, beauty, etc...

Such radical leveling requires highly invasive state power. Such power is dangerous on its own but also invites sociopathic personalities to pursue it. The people who desire it most deserve it least.

Once this impulse is let out of the cage, it is very hard to get the genie back in the bottle. History teaches us this with outbursts of righteousness-driven force such as Mao's Red Guards or the violent American radicalism of the 1970s.

Wokeness and the social justice movement are a further intensification of the principle of righteousness armed with force because of its attempt to level every aspect of society at the outcome level.

Its desire to enforce radical equality of outcome is not limited to America's borders. Increasingly, since the Bush and Obama Administrations, it views American military power as something to be aggressively and proactively projected in its service.

Historically speaking, American intervention was justified by American interests, not a specific set of values. This is why America supported dictators around the world in the struggle against Communism. It was not an endorsement of their views or actions, but a recognition of realpolitik. America needed allies and found them where she could.

Compare with the post-9/11 view of American intervention: America must turn Iraq into Japan in the desert, not because this is good for America, but because liberal democracy is especially noble and righteous.

Righteousness and force have become universalist. Any deviation from a specific form of political organization or way of life is seen as prima facie evidence of electoral chicanery or tyranny.

This offers insight into the $64,000 question: Why can't San Francisco just leave Oklahoma City alone? For that matter, why can't California cities leave the more rural, suburban, and conservative parts of California alone? Because of this universalist drive for an extremely abstract notion of human equality effectively without limits.

Any variance from their all-encompassing notion of righteousness requires force, not persuasion, to correct.

"History doesn't repeat, but it rhymes" and this is a great example of how that old historical cliche plays out in the real world. The "protests" of summer 2020 aren't all that different from the protests of the 1960s and 1970s, but there is more going on here than a simple expression of popular rage or even the boredom of the young adults.

The riots of 2020 were not terribly different from how death squads work in banana republics. The leftists were allowed to burn, loot, pillage, and assault at will, but any response in defense would result in arrest and criminal charges. Thus, there is the quasi-religious nature to the movement, expressed in the exuberant fanatical violence of last summer. These riots act as something of a victory dance and an act of war – is it not clear that the righteous were able to increase their social and political power in the United States by rioting?

Furthermore, there is a religious aspect to the COVID-19 hysteria. It ignores actual data on the subject in favor of an ever-shifting official "science." The adherents of this leverage coercion through mask and vaccine mandates while also openly calling for punishment or even death for those who do not comply.

The COVID cult introduces fear into the mix, a form of coercion, with an eye toward gaining compliance and assistance from those not otherwise predisposed toward ideological flights of fancy.

The pandemic provided an opportunity for otherwise diffuse forces to band together in the name of controlling every aspect of human behavior. It also provided insight into just how many restrictions on human freedom people were willing to submit to.

Weaponized Righteousness Cannot Be Reasoned With

It runs counter to the general sense of fair play and open-mindedness that the Anglo-Saxon tradition is known for to say that there is a person or group of people who are not worth communicating with.

But the righteous want total control over every aspect of social and private life, and they are satisfied with nothing less and will do anything to get it. Their desires for control are an insatiable black hole, an endless quest for new dragons to slay.

Further, they do not respect the notion of rights as you and I understand them. Rights, for the militantly righteous, are positive values provided by the government in the service of moving the world closer to their utopia. Rights are not boundaries to be respected but are instead manipulated as a means to an end.

Finally, because their ideology has a quasi-religious nature to it, there is no arguing with them. Arguing with the righteous over whether or not America is an inherently racist country is a bit like arguing with a brick wall over whether or not the moon is made of green cheese.

Political righteousness has no sense of "live and let live," let alone any sense that persuasion is better than force.

The cynic can be reasoned with or even bribed. For the true believer, there is no acceptable result except for total and complete victory. Those seeking to ensure freedom for themselves, their family, their community, and their future would do well to form a clear picture of how militant, weaponized righteousness has worked in the past.

Righteousness and force didn't end last summer – we can see it in the digital pages of our electronic newspapers almost every day. The attempts to decide what is right for you and yours, and to enforce such at gunpoint is the essence of armed righteousness. The reader will ignore its ever-changing manifestations at his own peril.

Written by Sam Jacobs
Categories: Blogs, United States

Trent Colbert: All I had to do was apologize.

Wed, 2021-10-27 11:26 +0000

But he wouldn't.  "We must end the culture of performative repentance."

I could go back to studying for my classes. I could stop the seemingly endless meetings with Yale administrators. And I could save my legal career—a future that now seemed in jeopardy.

All I had to do was apologize.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

FDA Votes to Use American Children in Vaccine Experiment

Wed, 2021-10-27 11:24 +0000

"That's the way it goes." -Dr. Ruben, FDA Panel.

The FDA panel has voted 17 to 0 to approve the Pfizer vaccine for 5 to 11-year-olds.  One of the FDA Panelists, Dr. Ruben, outlined his support by saying “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it goes.” 

Another panelist noted that 700 young people under the age of 18 have died ‘with‘ COVID, or COVID related symptoms in the past two years.  With the full support of the FDA panel, the large scale rollout of the vaccine in young children will now head to the CDC for final approvals. 

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Conrad Black: America Gone Mad

Wed, 2021-10-27 09:46 +0000

Who could have foreseen?

Various well-informed British and Europeans told me that they found a variety of utterances by Joe Biden and his spokespeople grievously inappropriate or absurd. Most upsetting were Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ po-faced assurance that “the border is closed” while on the other half of the split-screen people were simultaneously wading or walking into the country illegally; climate czar John Kerry importuning the Chinese government to decelerate their pell-mell commissioning of new coal-fired power plants; Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s fatuous lamentation about the “lack of diversity” in the new Taliban government in Afghanistan; and White House press secretary Jen Psaki’s assertion that the administration “welcomed the competition” of Russia’s hypersonic nuclear-tipped missiles. The Internet assures a very widespread transmission of such howlers and the next time Biden or Blinken lay the egg about America being “back” and trusted, the Washington Post should dedicate its entire front page to Pinocchio.

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Some Public Comment on FDA Covid Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization For Kids Aged 5-11.

Tue, 2021-10-26 20:33 +0000

Listen to both Parts 1 & 2.

Categories: Blogs, United States

Is There Any Hope For Whites?

Tue, 2021-10-26 12:17 +0000

Or do we "hold back their ability to do the most harm?"

Professor Brittney Cooper — in the words of The Root, a “noted scholar” — recently gave a talk titled Unpacking the Attacks on Critical Race Theory.

The event was part of The Root Institute, an annual conference “aimed at “exploring socio-political, cultural, and entertainment topics to advance the agenda of Black Americans, as exemplified by the current state of race relations in the US.”

According to The Root, “angry white parents have lashed out at school board meetings over the socalled taboo teaching.”

Hence, the outlet “felt compelled to cut through all of the misinformation that’s been swirling to center the conversation in a healthy dose of reality.”

Cue Ms. Cooper, who’s clearly pro-CRT — she teaches it to college students.

And she asks them if there’s any hope for whites — can we “legislate [racism] away and…march it away…or, do we think white people just always gonna be like this, and our job is to hold back their ability to do the most harm?”

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

The Supply Chain Problem

Tue, 2021-10-26 12:01 +0000

It's a progressive affliction.

If you read liberal newspapers, you might get the impression that ports are jammed and backlogged everywhere. But they’re not. Some ports aren’t backlogged at all, in states that are conservative, or were conservative until recently.

As Phil Kerpen notes, “Florida is doing record cargo volume with no backlogs, and is inviting vessels stalled in California to divert via the Panama Canal. The week trip is probably their fastest route to market.” Florida is a right-to-work state where there are no compulsory union dues.

Similarly, as Alec Stapp notes, “Unlike other major ports on both coasts, the Port of Virginia remains free of backlogs despite experiencing similar record volumes. How? It’s one of the most automated ports in the country.”

“And why is the Port of Virginia automated?,” asks the Cato Institute’s Paul Matzko. “It’s a right to work state with weaker unions that haven’t been able to stop it. For contrast, see California,” where ports have backlogs of many days.

Virginia was until recently governed by a Republican legislature, so it still has labor laws that reflect that, laws that enabled its ports to automate without being blocked by unions. But that may change after the Virginia state elections this November 2, if Democrats maintain their current majorities in the state legislature, and elect the next governor.

The Virginia governor’s race is very close, and it is possible that Republicans will win it. But prediction markets give the Democrats a 70% chance of winning, and polls show the Democratic candidate with a narrow 2% lead. Every vote counts.

A Democratic victory would harm the state’s economy. 

Read the rest here.

Categories: Blogs, United States

The Manchester Free Press aims to bring together in one place everything that you need to know about what’s happening in the Free State of New Hampshire.

As of August 2021, we are currently in the process of removing dead links and feeds, and updating the site with newer ones.




Our friends & allies

New Hampshire

United States